東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness./
作者:	Lilly, Juliana Janette.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (145 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International63-03A.
標題:	Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3010039click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780493197081

The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness.
Lilly, Juliana Janette.

The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness. - 1 online resource (145 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2001.

Includes bibliographical references

When decisions are made, individuals involved in the decision-making process tend to react in different ways, depending on what process is used and what outcome is received. Previous organizational justice research has found that fair procedures increase the likelihood that an individual will accept an unfavorable outcome, but research to date has not fully explained why some individuals react negatively to unfavorable decisions made by normatively fair procedures. This study combined elements of attribution theory with elements of organizational justice theory by introducing self-threat as a key variable in determining if the combination of these two research streams can help explain why some individuals react to negative outcomes in a manner inconsistent with previous organizational justice findings. Study results show that increased levels of self-threat are positively related to externalized self-serving bias and negatively related to perceptions of both procedural and distributive fairness. Externalized self-serving bias was hypothesized to be a mediator of the relationship between self-threat and a perception of fairness, but this hypothesis was not supported. Support for this mediation relationship would have helped link the literature on attribution theory to the literature on organizational justice by explaining one condition (self-threat) under which procedural fairness is overwhelmed, causing individuals to react negatively to an unfavorable outcome generated by a normatively fair process. Because the theoretical premise supporting the mediating effects of externalized bias on the self-threat/fairness relationship appears logical and theoretically sound, nonsignificance may have been due primarily to suspected measurement problems concerning externalized self-serving bias. This study is the first to combine elements of self-serving bias with organizational justice. The finding that self-threat is related to both self-serving bias and perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness indicates that some relationship does exist between the attribution literature concerning self-serving bias and the organizational justice literature. Finding evidence of this link might help organizations curb undesirable employee behaviors by helping individuals cope with negative events that occur in the workplace.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780493197081Subjects--Topical Terms:

3433795
Studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Attribution theoryIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness.
LDR:03786nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2365233
005 20231213130623.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2001 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780493197081
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3010039
035 $a AAI3010039
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Lilly, Juliana Janette. $3 3706067
245 1 4 $a The effect of self -threat and self -serving bias on perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness.
264 0 $c 2001
300 $a 1 online resource (145 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Wofford, Jerry.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Arlington, 2001.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a When decisions are made, individuals involved in the decision-making process tend to react in different ways, depending on what process is used and what outcome is received. Previous organizational justice research has found that fair procedures increase the likelihood that an individual will accept an unfavorable outcome, but research to date has not fully explained why some individuals react negatively to unfavorable decisions made by normatively fair procedures. This study combined elements of attribution theory with elements of organizational justice theory by introducing self-threat as a key variable in determining if the combination of these two research streams can help explain why some individuals react to negative outcomes in a manner inconsistent with previous organizational justice findings. Study results show that increased levels of self-threat are positively related to externalized self-serving bias and negatively related to perceptions of both procedural and distributive fairness. Externalized self-serving bias was hypothesized to be a mediator of the relationship between self-threat and a perception of fairness, but this hypothesis was not supported. Support for this mediation relationship would have helped link the literature on attribution theory to the literature on organizational justice by explaining one condition (self-threat) under which procedural fairness is overwhelmed, causing individuals to react negatively to an unfavorable outcome generated by a normatively fair process. Because the theoretical premise supporting the mediating effects of externalized bias on the self-threat/fairness relationship appears logical and theoretically sound, nonsignificance may have been due primarily to suspected measurement problems concerning externalized self-serving bias. This study is the first to combine elements of self-serving bias with organizational justice. The finding that self-threat is related to both self-serving bias and perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness indicates that some relationship does exist between the attribution literature concerning self-serving bias and the organizational justice literature. Finding evidence of this link might help organizations curb undesirable employee behaviors by helping individuals cope with negative events that occur in the workplace.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Studies. $3 3433795
650 4 $a Bias. $2 gtt $3 1374837
650 4 $a Perceptions. $3 3435328
650 4 $a Self esteem. $3 3562235
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
653 $a Attribution theory
653 $a Bias
653 $a Distributive justice
653 $a Fairness
653 $a Self-serving
653 $a Self-threat
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Arlington. $3 1025869
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 63-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3010039 $z click for full text (PQDT)