東華大學圖書館 |

The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism : = The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism :/
其他題名:	The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China.
作者:	Xie, Ming.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (264 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-05A.
標題:	Public administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028515click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798684675959

The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism : = The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China.
Xie, Ming.

The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism :The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China. - 1 online resource (264 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this research is to explore the interplay of neoliberalism and socio-political institutions and their impact on environmental nonprofit organizations' accountabilities in an authoritarian regime-in this case, China. It focuses on how environmental nonprofit organizations in China navigate neoliberalism and their relationship with various stakeholders. It examines the primary research question: How have environmental nonprofit organizations constructed their accountabilities within the neoliberal context of China? Related to the primary research question, this research has three secondary research questions based on the literature of neoliberalism and social constructionist framework of accountability: (1) How have neoliberal discourses been embedded in environmental nonprofit organizations' accountability practices and processes? (2) To whom are environmental nonprofit organizations accountable? (3) How are environmental nonprofit organizations accountable? A multiple case study approach was used, consisting of in-depth interviews, field observations, online observations, and document analysis of three environmental nonprofit organizations in Beijing, China. The research findings suggest that the environmental nonprofit organizations' accountability building was deeply rooted in their understanding of the nonprofit organizations' roles and functions in society and the state-society relationship. The government's adoption of neoliberal policies has created a nonprofit sector that serves as an extension of the state rather than challenging larger institutional and social structures. For the three organizations studied, various development approaches have been adopted to embrace or resist neoliberal practices and discourses. Two case study organizations developed their capacity through the organizations' marketization and managerialization. Professionalization has been a strategy for these two organizations to maintain their legitimacy, organizational identity, and mission achievement as well as maintain their relationship with funders. In contrast, the third organization has tried to resist marketization, managerialization, and professionalization while remain its social impact. Accountability building was largely based on the organizations' capacity for navigating stakeholder groups who held critical resources or power such as the central government, local government, and domestic foundations. Accountability practices mainly focused on information disclosure to funders and donors, meaningful stakeholder engagement with stakeholders who hold critical resources and power for these organizations, and organizational capacity building to mobilize social and financial resources. As an ongoing process, this research identifies the dynamics of the state-society relationship and the changing spaces in which environmental nonprofit organizations in China have been allowed to operate. It challenges a simple understanding of the relationship between neoliberalism and civil society.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798684675959Subjects--Topical Terms:

531287
Public administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AccountabilityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism : = The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China.
LDR:04943nmm a2200565K 4500 001 2365020
005 20231213130518.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798684675959
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28028515
035 $a AAI28028515
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Xie, Ming. $3 1675073
245 1 4 $a The Interplay of Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism : $b The Social Construction of Accountability by Environmental Nonprofit Organizations in China.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (264 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Eikenberry, Angela M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this research is to explore the interplay of neoliberalism and socio-political institutions and their impact on environmental nonprofit organizations' accountabilities in an authoritarian regime-in this case, China. It focuses on how environmental nonprofit organizations in China navigate neoliberalism and their relationship with various stakeholders. It examines the primary research question: How have environmental nonprofit organizations constructed their accountabilities within the neoliberal context of China? Related to the primary research question, this research has three secondary research questions based on the literature of neoliberalism and social constructionist framework of accountability: (1) How have neoliberal discourses been embedded in environmental nonprofit organizations' accountability practices and processes? (2) To whom are environmental nonprofit organizations accountable? (3) How are environmental nonprofit organizations accountable? A multiple case study approach was used, consisting of in-depth interviews, field observations, online observations, and document analysis of three environmental nonprofit organizations in Beijing, China. The research findings suggest that the environmental nonprofit organizations' accountability building was deeply rooted in their understanding of the nonprofit organizations' roles and functions in society and the state-society relationship. The government's adoption of neoliberal policies has created a nonprofit sector that serves as an extension of the state rather than challenging larger institutional and social structures. For the three organizations studied, various development approaches have been adopted to embrace or resist neoliberal practices and discourses. Two case study organizations developed their capacity through the organizations' marketization and managerialization. Professionalization has been a strategy for these two organizations to maintain their legitimacy, organizational identity, and mission achievement as well as maintain their relationship with funders. In contrast, the third organization has tried to resist marketization, managerialization, and professionalization while remain its social impact. Accountability building was largely based on the organizations' capacity for navigating stakeholder groups who held critical resources or power such as the central government, local government, and domestic foundations. Accountability practices mainly focused on information disclosure to funders and donors, meaningful stakeholder engagement with stakeholders who hold critical resources and power for these organizations, and organizational capacity building to mobilize social and financial resources. As an ongoing process, this research identifies the dynamics of the state-society relationship and the changing spaces in which environmental nonprofit organizations in China have been allowed to operate. It challenges a simple understanding of the relationship between neoliberalism and civil society.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Accountability
653 $a Authoritarianism
653 $a Civil society
653 $a Environment protection
653 $a Neoliberalism
653 $a Nonprofit organization
653 $a Socio-political institutions
653 $a Beijing, China
653 $a State-society relationship
653 $a Marketization
653 $a Managerialization
653 $a Professionalization
653 $a Domestic foundations
653 $a Local government
653 $a Central government
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Nebraska at Omaha. $b Public Administration. $3 2098249
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-05A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028515 $z click for full text (PQDT)