東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education : = Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education :/
Reminder of title:	Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith.
Author:	Asenavage Loptes, Karen.
Description:	1 online resource (482 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12A.
Subject:	Organizational behavior. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27994980click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798641002040

A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education : = Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith.
Asenavage Loptes, Karen.

A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education :Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith. - 1 online resource (482 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Eastern University, 2019.

Includes bibliographical references

For decades now, higher education has responded to globalization with institutional internationalization. However, at many institutions, the rhetoric of internationalization has been more pervasive than comprehensive and sustained action. Despite its importance, little qualitative research has examined what prompts and who motivates actions resulting in implementation of internationalization. Even less research has been conducted at diverse types of higher education institutions. This dissertation provides insight into how context, culture, leadership, and faith influenced the implementation of internationalization and global practices (IGPs) at two small US higher education institutions.The purpose of this dual case study was to examine why and how two small US liberal arts institutions-one non-faith-based, and one faith-based-and their leaders implemented IGPs. Four research questions guided this study: (a) What are the internal and external factors that affect IGPs of the institutions? (b) Who are the leaders, their roles, and their leadership approaches towards IGPs at each institution? (c) What are the global practices of leaders? and (d) How does the faith factor influence internationalization, leaders, and global practices?This study was conducted utilizing a social constructivist and pragmatic methodological design. More than 100 participants at the two institutions were interviewed. The participants represented leaders at the senior, trustee, middle, faculty, staff, student, and community levels.Four significant institutional influences on IGPs emerged from the data. Indeed, participants cited (a) context, as influenced by size, location, and external pressures and motivations over time; (b) culture, as influenced by the people, place, and purpose of the institution; (c) leadership, as it influenced and is influenced by culture, specifically, authentic, servant, shared, intrapreneurial, and women in leadership, as well as reluctant and anti-leadership; and (d) faith, as it influenced institutional context, culture, and leadership of IGPs. Identifying these influences led to the development of the novel Internationalization System (INTSYS) model that educators and administrators can utilize to conduct analysis and plan for institutional change in the implementation of IGPs.Seventeen key findings are presented based upon the four key components of the INTSYS model: context, culture (purpose, place, and people), leadership, and faith. Specifically, senior leaders utilized authentic and servant leadership approaches creating a culture conducive for middle leaders and faculty to employ shared and intrapreneurship leadership for IGPs. Women middle leaders, faculty, staff, and students were essential to the implementation of IGPs in a variety of high impact service positions. Faith emerged, over all other influences, in sustaining IGPs over time at both institutions. Implications, recommendations, and directions for future research are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798641002040Subjects--Topical Terms:

516683
Organizational behavior.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Faith-basedIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education : = Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith.
LDR:04466nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2364999
005 20231213130512.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2019 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798641002040
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27994980
035 $a AAI27994980
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Asenavage Loptes, Karen. $3 3705823
245 1 2 $a A Systems Model for Internationalization in U.S. Higher Education : $b Influence of Context, Culture, Leadership, and Faith.
264 0 $c 2019
300 $a 1 online resource (482 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Chang, Heewon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Eastern University, 2019.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a For decades now, higher education has responded to globalization with institutional internationalization. However, at many institutions, the rhetoric of internationalization has been more pervasive than comprehensive and sustained action. Despite its importance, little qualitative research has examined what prompts and who motivates actions resulting in implementation of internationalization. Even less research has been conducted at diverse types of higher education institutions. This dissertation provides insight into how context, culture, leadership, and faith influenced the implementation of internationalization and global practices (IGPs) at two small US higher education institutions.The purpose of this dual case study was to examine why and how two small US liberal arts institutions-one non-faith-based, and one faith-based-and their leaders implemented IGPs. Four research questions guided this study: (a) What are the internal and external factors that affect IGPs of the institutions? (b) Who are the leaders, their roles, and their leadership approaches towards IGPs at each institution? (c) What are the global practices of leaders? and (d) How does the faith factor influence internationalization, leaders, and global practices?This study was conducted utilizing a social constructivist and pragmatic methodological design. More than 100 participants at the two institutions were interviewed. The participants represented leaders at the senior, trustee, middle, faculty, staff, student, and community levels.Four significant institutional influences on IGPs emerged from the data. Indeed, participants cited (a) context, as influenced by size, location, and external pressures and motivations over time; (b) culture, as influenced by the people, place, and purpose of the institution; (c) leadership, as it influenced and is influenced by culture, specifically, authentic, servant, shared, intrapreneurial, and women in leadership, as well as reluctant and anti-leadership; and (d) faith, as it influenced institutional context, culture, and leadership of IGPs. Identifying these influences led to the development of the novel Internationalization System (INTSYS) model that educators and administrators can utilize to conduct analysis and plan for institutional change in the implementation of IGPs.Seventeen key findings are presented based upon the four key components of the INTSYS model: context, culture (purpose, place, and people), leadership, and faith. Specifically, senior leaders utilized authentic and servant leadership approaches creating a culture conducive for middle leaders and faculty to employ shared and intrapreneurship leadership for IGPs. Women middle leaders, faculty, staff, and students were essential to the implementation of IGPs in a variety of high impact service positions. Faith emerged, over all other influences, in sustaining IGPs over time at both institutions. Implications, recommendations, and directions for future research are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
650 4 $a College administration. $3 3480538
653 $a Faith-based
653 $a Higher education
653 $a Institutional culture and context
653 $a Internationalization
653 $a Leadership
653 $a Organizational systems
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Eastern University. $b Organizational Leadership. $3 3180520
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27994980 $z click for full text (PQDT)