東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics./
作者:	Teitel, Trevor.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (204 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-02A.
標題:	Metaphysics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27828990click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798662486409

Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics.
Teitel, Trevor.

Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics. - 1 online resource (204 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation is chiefly about metaphysical questions raised by space and time, and how mathematical physics should inform our answers to those and other metaphysical questions. At centre-stage are questions about the modal properties of spacetime, and how doctrines about what spacetime points are, and what their essential properties are, interact with those modal questions. Topics that are discussed include: (i) theoretical equivalence, and whether purely mathematical facts about our best contemporary physical theories can constrain how we use those theories to guide metaphysical theorizing, (ii) the hole argument-which purports to show that General Relativity is indeterministic-how to respond to the argument in terms of essence, and whether this essentialist response is preferable to responding directly in modal terms, (iii) the tenability of the modal doctrine of anti-haecceitism, and whether vagueness can be used to defend a novel metaphysic of spacetime that implies this doctrine, (iv) the property of background independence, or "not positing a fixed spacetime background," and whether we should be more confident in physical theories that have this property than in those that don't, (v) whether essentialist claims can be used to explain and ground modal ones, and (vi) the tenability of qualitativist and structuralist metaphysical doctrines about spacetime. The dissertation as a whole also illustrates how we can make progress on foundational issues in the philosophy of physics by applying tools from metaphysics, and general limitations of a common methodology that instead focuses primarily on mathematical questions as a means of arriving at metaphysical conclusions about the non-mathematical world.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798662486409Subjects--Topical Terms:

517082
Metaphysics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

EssenceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics.
LDR:03083nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2364981
005 20231213130506.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798662486409
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27828990
035 $a AAI27828990
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Teitel, Trevor. $3 3705804
245 1 0 $a Metaphysical Possibilities in Spacetime Physics.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (204 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dorr, Cian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation is chiefly about metaphysical questions raised by space and time, and how mathematical physics should inform our answers to those and other metaphysical questions. At centre-stage are questions about the modal properties of spacetime, and how doctrines about what spacetime points are, and what their essential properties are, interact with those modal questions. Topics that are discussed include: (i) theoretical equivalence, and whether purely mathematical facts about our best contemporary physical theories can constrain how we use those theories to guide metaphysical theorizing, (ii) the hole argument-which purports to show that General Relativity is indeterministic-how to respond to the argument in terms of essence, and whether this essentialist response is preferable to responding directly in modal terms, (iii) the tenability of the modal doctrine of anti-haecceitism, and whether vagueness can be used to defend a novel metaphysic of spacetime that implies this doctrine, (iv) the property of background independence, or "not positing a fixed spacetime background," and whether we should be more confident in physical theories that have this property than in those that don't, (v) whether essentialist claims can be used to explain and ground modal ones, and (vi) the tenability of qualitativist and structuralist metaphysical doctrines about spacetime. The dissertation as a whole also illustrates how we can make progress on foundational issues in the philosophy of physics by applying tools from metaphysics, and general limitations of a common methodology that instead focuses primarily on mathematical questions as a means of arriving at metaphysical conclusions about the non-mathematical world.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
653 $a Essence
653 $a Haecceitism
653 $a Modality
653 $a Spacetime
653 $a Substantivalism
653 $a Theoretical equivalence
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0396
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a New York University. $b Philosophy. $3 1031970
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27828990 $z click for full text (PQDT)