東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Computational Close Reading : = A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Computational Close Reading :/
其他題名:	A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology.
作者:	Consilvio, Damiano.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (205 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11B.
標題:	American literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30248605click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379500610

Computational Close Reading : = A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology.
Consilvio, Damiano.

Computational Close Reading :A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology. - 1 online resource (205 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Rhode Island, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Computational Close Reading intervenes in digital humanities and American literary scholarship to negotiate a significant institutional and disciplinary problem: the devaluation of close reading and interpretation in digital humanities applications to literary studies in favor of more distant modes of reading. To remedy this issue, I pursue a core question meant to bring the literary and the digital into a more perfect confluence, as a demonstration of possibilities meant to run counter to these preconceptions about computational reading: how "close," if close at all, can digital technologies bring us to the interpretive elements of literary texts? I argue that they can bring us quite close, opening a perceived gap in knowledge about the 'hows' that are possible in computational reading. As a matter of necessity, I also speak to the questions that underlie this core issue in the humanities, such as why the computerization of literary studies has allegedly moved away from interpretation and close reading in favor of digital curation and digital tool-building; what other modes of reading computerization has given way to, and how these differ from traditional approaches (close, distant, hyper, machine, etc.); what is so different about traditional literary studies and the resulting digital turn, and why this disparity came to be; and, perhaps most importantly, how the analytical affordances of the digital humanities can be leveraged to advance and preserve the original goals of literary studies as a discipline, instead of enabling their supersession. Put plainly, Computational Close Reading challenges the notion that digital humanities necessitates new approaches to literature-rather, I am interested in how digital technologies can enhance our original approaches to literature and reaffirm their universal relevance and importance. This volume intends to argue, at its core, that the age of computerization does not make obsolete or short-sighted the traditional methods of literary analysis in the face of new approaches to reading, but rather encourages us to pursue those same original disciplinary goals with renewed perspective and capability.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379500610Subjects--Topical Terms:

523234
American literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:

American literatureIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Computational Close Reading : = A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology.
LDR:03570nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2364776
005 20231212064417.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379500610
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30248605
035 $a AAI30248605
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Consilvio, Damiano. $3 3705595
245 1 0 $a Computational Close Reading : $b A Critique of Digital Literary Methodology.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (205 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Faflik, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Rhode Island, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Computational Close Reading intervenes in digital humanities and American literary scholarship to negotiate a significant institutional and disciplinary problem: the devaluation of close reading and interpretation in digital humanities applications to literary studies in favor of more distant modes of reading. To remedy this issue, I pursue a core question meant to bring the literary and the digital into a more perfect confluence, as a demonstration of possibilities meant to run counter to these preconceptions about computational reading: how "close," if close at all, can digital technologies bring us to the interpretive elements of literary texts? I argue that they can bring us quite close, opening a perceived gap in knowledge about the 'hows' that are possible in computational reading. As a matter of necessity, I also speak to the questions that underlie this core issue in the humanities, such as why the computerization of literary studies has allegedly moved away from interpretation and close reading in favor of digital curation and digital tool-building; what other modes of reading computerization has given way to, and how these differ from traditional approaches (close, distant, hyper, machine, etc.); what is so different about traditional literary studies and the resulting digital turn, and why this disparity came to be; and, perhaps most importantly, how the analytical affordances of the digital humanities can be leveraged to advance and preserve the original goals of literary studies as a discipline, instead of enabling their supersession. Put plainly, Computational Close Reading challenges the notion that digital humanities necessitates new approaches to literature-rather, I am interested in how digital technologies can enhance our original approaches to literature and reaffirm their universal relevance and importance. This volume intends to argue, at its core, that the age of computerization does not make obsolete or short-sighted the traditional methods of literary analysis in the face of new approaches to reading, but rather encourages us to pursue those same original disciplinary goals with renewed perspective and capability.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a American literature. $3 523234
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
653 $a American literature
653 $a Close reading
653 $a Digital humanities
653 $a Traditional literary studies
653 $a Computational reading
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0591
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0401
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Rhode Island. $b English. $3 3179736
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30248605 $z click for full text (PQDT)