語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control : = A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control :/
其他題名:
A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru.
作者:
Kroeger, Timm.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (324 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International65-06B.
標題:
Environmental science. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3099388click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780496469802
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control : = A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru.
Kroeger, Timm.
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control :
A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru. - 1 online resource (324 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2003.
Includes bibliographical references
Much economic literature expounds the superior cost-effectiveness of economic incentive (EI) policies over command-and-control (CAC) ones, based on appealing theoretical arguments. However, one of the assumptions underlying much of this literature is that monitoring and enforcement (M&E) of policies are not only feasible, but essentially costless. In reality, M&E are never costless and sometimes infeasible, and, crucially, M&E requirements vary across policy types. Furthermore, in technical economic terms, cost-effectiveness is defined with respect to variable costs only; however, in choosing among policies, the objective generally is to identify that with the lowest total (variable plus fixed) cost per unit abatement, which in its own right may be termed cost-effective. The neglect of M&E and of fixed costs throws up the question of the validity of much of the policy advice that draws on the environmental economics literature for developing countries, where the institutional capacity for effective M&E often is strongly limited, and where creating this capacity will require considerable infrastructure investments. The limited institutional capacity also has led to the suggestion that in developing countries, conventional environmental policies, such as input or output taxes, emission charges, or standards, may be less cost-effective than non-conventional environmental policies, such as direct public provision of electricity from renewable sources, because the M&E capacity required for the implementation of non-conventional policies is often less stringent. I test the hypotheses of superior cost-effectiveness of EI over CAC and of non-conventional over conventional environmental policy instruments. The samples of pollution control policies used to test the hypotheses are drawn from a list of frequently recommended urban air pollution abatement measures for developing countries, plus two renewable energy sources. Both sets of environmental policy types are compared under the explicit inclusion of the M&E costs, in a developing-country context. I find that there is no substantial difference in the average cost-effectiveness of policy instruments, neither between EI and CAC, nor between conventional and non-conventional . This finding, however, is sensitive to locality-specific factors, which underlines the decisive importance of the context, and the danger of making policy on broad-based presumptions instead of careful analysis of the specific situation.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780496469802Subjects--Topical Terms:
677245
Environmental science.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Command-and-controlIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control : = A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru.
LDR
:04177nmm a2200433K 4500
001
2364638
005
20231130105859.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2003 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780496469802
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3099388
035
$a
AAI3099388
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Kroeger, Timm.
$3
3705454
245
1 0
$a
Exploring the comparative cost -effectiveness of economic incentive and command -and -control instruments, and of renewable energy technologies in PM10 emission control :
$b
A case study of Lima-Callao, Peru.
264
0
$c
2003
300
$a
1 online resource (324 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 65-06, Section: B.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Hall, Charles A. S.;Keith, Sara E.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2003.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Much economic literature expounds the superior cost-effectiveness of economic incentive (EI) policies over command-and-control (CAC) ones, based on appealing theoretical arguments. However, one of the assumptions underlying much of this literature is that monitoring and enforcement (M&E) of policies are not only feasible, but essentially costless. In reality, M&E are never costless and sometimes infeasible, and, crucially, M&E requirements vary across policy types. Furthermore, in technical economic terms, cost-effectiveness is defined with respect to variable costs only; however, in choosing among policies, the objective generally is to identify that with the lowest total (variable plus fixed) cost per unit abatement, which in its own right may be termed cost-effective. The neglect of M&E and of fixed costs throws up the question of the validity of much of the policy advice that draws on the environmental economics literature for developing countries, where the institutional capacity for effective M&E often is strongly limited, and where creating this capacity will require considerable infrastructure investments. The limited institutional capacity also has led to the suggestion that in developing countries, conventional environmental policies, such as input or output taxes, emission charges, or standards, may be less cost-effective than non-conventional environmental policies, such as direct public provision of electricity from renewable sources, because the M&E capacity required for the implementation of non-conventional policies is often less stringent. I test the hypotheses of superior cost-effectiveness of EI over CAC and of non-conventional over conventional environmental policy instruments. The samples of pollution control policies used to test the hypotheses are drawn from a list of frequently recommended urban air pollution abatement measures for developing countries, plus two renewable energy sources. Both sets of environmental policy types are compared under the explicit inclusion of the M&E costs, in a developing-country context. I find that there is no substantial difference in the average cost-effectiveness of policy instruments, neither between EI and CAC, nor between conventional and non-conventional . This finding, however, is sensitive to locality-specific factors, which underlines the decisive importance of the context, and the danger of making policy on broad-based presumptions instead of careful analysis of the specific situation.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Environmental science.
$3
677245
650
4
$a
Energy.
$3
876794
650
4
$a
Comparative analysis.
$3
3548341
650
4
$a
Effectiveness.
$3
3546567
650
4
$a
Emissions control.
$3
3705455
650
4
$a
Studies.
$3
3433795
650
4
$a
Diesel fuels.
$3
3704140
650
4
$a
Fossil fuels.
$3
701525
650
4
$a
Air pollution.
$3
888377
650
4
$a
Alternative energy sources.
$3
3561089
650
4
$a
Natural gas.
$3
668611
650
4
$a
Outdoor air quality.
$3
3560044
653
$a
Command-and-control
653
$a
Cost-effectiveness
653
$a
Economic incentive
653
$a
Emissions
653
$a
Particulate matter
653
$a
Peru
653
$a
Renewable energy
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0768
690
$a
0501
690
$a
0791
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry.
$3
1017822
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
65-06B.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3099388
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9486994
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入