東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador./
作者:	Alarcon, Jose Segundo Lema.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (286 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01A.
標題:	Teaching. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400033click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379873578

A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador.
Alarcon, Jose Segundo Lema.

A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador. - 1 online resource (286 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Exeter (United Kingdom), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

In finding out the nature of cohesion in L2 writing, the present study set out to address three research questions: (1) What types of cohesion relations occur in L2 writing at the sentence, paragraph, and whole-text levels? (2) What is the relationship between lexico-grammatical cohesion features and teachers' judgements of writing quality? (3) Do expectations of cohesion suggested by the CEFR match what is found in student writing?To answer those questions, a corpus of 240 essays and 240 emails from college-level students learning English as a foreign language in Ecuador enabled the analysis of cohesion. Each text included the scores, or teachers' judgements of writing quality aligned to the upper-intermediate level (or B2) as proposed by the Common European Framework of Reference for learning, teaching, and assessing English as a foreign language.Lexical and grammatical items used by L2 students to build relationships of meaning in sentences, paragraphs, and the entire text were considered to analyse cohesion in L2 writing. Utilising Natural Language Processing tools (e.g., TAACO, TextInspector, NVivo), the analysis focused on determining which cohesion features (e.g., word repetition/overlap, semantical similarity, connective words) predicted the teachers' judgements of writing quality in the collected essays and emails.The findings indicate that L2 writing is characterised by word overlap and synonyms occurring at the paragraph level and, to a lesser degree, cohesion between sentences and the entire text (e.g., connective words). Whilst these cohesion features positively and negatively predicted the teachers' scores, a cautious interpretation of these findings is required, as many other factors beyond cohesion features must have also influenced the allocation of scores in L2 writing.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379873578Subjects--Topical Terms:

517098
Teaching.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador.
LDR:03144nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2364574
005 20231130105841.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379873578
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30400033
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Exeter10871132219
035 $a AAI30400033
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Alarcon, Jose Segundo Lema. $3 3705387
245 1 2 $a A Corpus-Based Analysis of Cohesion in L2 Writing by Undergraduates in Ecuador.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (286 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Myhill, Debra;Durrant, Philip.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Exeter (United Kingdom), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In finding out the nature of cohesion in L2 writing, the present study set out to address three research questions: (1) What types of cohesion relations occur in L2 writing at the sentence, paragraph, and whole-text levels? (2) What is the relationship between lexico-grammatical cohesion features and teachers' judgements of writing quality? (3) Do expectations of cohesion suggested by the CEFR match what is found in student writing?To answer those questions, a corpus of 240 essays and 240 emails from college-level students learning English as a foreign language in Ecuador enabled the analysis of cohesion. Each text included the scores, or teachers' judgements of writing quality aligned to the upper-intermediate level (or B2) as proposed by the Common European Framework of Reference for learning, teaching, and assessing English as a foreign language.Lexical and grammatical items used by L2 students to build relationships of meaning in sentences, paragraphs, and the entire text were considered to analyse cohesion in L2 writing. Utilising Natural Language Processing tools (e.g., TAACO, TextInspector, NVivo), the analysis focused on determining which cohesion features (e.g., word repetition/overlap, semantical similarity, connective words) predicted the teachers' judgements of writing quality in the collected essays and emails.The findings indicate that L2 writing is characterised by word overlap and synonyms occurring at the paragraph level and, to a lesser degree, cohesion between sentences and the entire text (e.g., connective words). Whilst these cohesion features positively and negatively predicted the teachers' scores, a cautious interpretation of these findings is required, as many other factors beyond cohesion features must have also influenced the allocation of scores in L2 writing.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Writing instruction. $3 3681636
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Foreign language instruction. $3 3541319
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Latin American studies. $3 2122903
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0550
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Exeter (United Kingdom). $3 1273400
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30400033 $z click for full text (PQDT)