東華大學圖書館 |

Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education : = Teachers' Confidence and Views.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education :/
其他題名:	Teachers' Confidence and Views.
作者:	Tatar, Cansu.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (209 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-05B.
標題:	Educational technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30673797click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380713665

Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education : = Teachers' Confidence and Views.
Tatar, Cansu.

Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education :Teachers' Confidence and Views. - 1 online resource (209 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy skills have become essential to prepare youths for 21st- century needs. Despite the efforts to broaden AI education in K-12 classrooms, teaching AI concepts is mostly limited to Computer Science classrooms. Nonetheless, approximately half of U.S. high school students cannot access any Computer Science classes. This causes unequal access to AI education. To tackle this challenge, the utilization of curriculum integration emerges as a potent and effective strategy to facilitate interdisciplinary learning. Integrating AI concepts into non-STEM classrooms, especially English Language Art (ELA) classrooms can broaden access to AI education and reduce inequalities. However, teachers are key stakeholders in effective curriculum integration. Their views and confidence level play a critical role in providing sustainable curriculum integration. The current literature is limited in explaining high school ELA teachers' level of confidence and views in the context of integrating AI concepts into their classrooms. Thus, this study aims to fulfill the gaps in the research of non-STEM teachers' pedagogical beliefs, confidence, and experiences in learning and teaching AI concepts. Specifically, this study answers four research questions: 1) What was ELA teachers' level of confidence in integrating AI into their classrooms before and after participating in a curricular professional development program? 2) What were ELA teachers' views of integrating AI into ELA classrooms after participating in a curricular professional development program? 3) What challenges and opportunities do high school ELA teachers identify after they implement AI curricula in their classrooms? 4) What recommendations do ELA teachers offer to their ELA colleagues for implementing AI curricula in their classrooms? By following the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), this study examines ELA teachers' experiences in a curricular professional development program and their classroom implementations. The findings of this study revealed that after attending the PD, teachers' level of confidence in presenting and explaining AI topics to their students and facilitating and supporting students around AI concepts increased significantly. Teachers considered several factors (e.g., relevancy of the topics, opportunities for their students, and opportunities for their professional growth) when they were sharing their views on the integration. Additionally, after teachers implemented an AI curriculum into their classrooms, they identified opportunities (e.g., introducing AI-empowered careers and supporting students' critical thinking skills), challenges (e.g., technology issues), and needs for changes (e.g., adding scaffolding activities). Regarding the findings, this study discussed the implications for curriculum developers, ELA teachers, and make suggestions for educational researchers in the field of AI education.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380713665Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education : = Teachers' Confidence and Views.
LDR:04403nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2364488
005 20231130105313.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380713665
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30673797
035 $a (MiAaPQ)NCState_Univ18402041128
035 $a AAI30673797
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tatar, Cansu. $3 3705294
245 1 0 $a Rethinking English Language Arts Classrooms with Artificial Intelligence Education : $b Teachers' Confidence and Views.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (209 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Jiang, Shiyan;Oliver, Kevin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Carolina State University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy skills have become essential to prepare youths for 21st- century needs. Despite the efforts to broaden AI education in K-12 classrooms, teaching AI concepts is mostly limited to Computer Science classrooms. Nonetheless, approximately half of U.S. high school students cannot access any Computer Science classes. This causes unequal access to AI education. To tackle this challenge, the utilization of curriculum integration emerges as a potent and effective strategy to facilitate interdisciplinary learning. Integrating AI concepts into non-STEM classrooms, especially English Language Art (ELA) classrooms can broaden access to AI education and reduce inequalities. However, teachers are key stakeholders in effective curriculum integration. Their views and confidence level play a critical role in providing sustainable curriculum integration. The current literature is limited in explaining high school ELA teachers' level of confidence and views in the context of integrating AI concepts into their classrooms. Thus, this study aims to fulfill the gaps in the research of non-STEM teachers' pedagogical beliefs, confidence, and experiences in learning and teaching AI concepts. Specifically, this study answers four research questions: 1) What was ELA teachers' level of confidence in integrating AI into their classrooms before and after participating in a curricular professional development program? 2) What were ELA teachers' views of integrating AI into ELA classrooms after participating in a curricular professional development program? 3) What challenges and opportunities do high school ELA teachers identify after they implement AI curricula in their classrooms? 4) What recommendations do ELA teachers offer to their ELA colleagues for implementing AI curricula in their classrooms? By following the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), this study examines ELA teachers' experiences in a curricular professional development program and their classroom implementations. The findings of this study revealed that after attending the PD, teachers' level of confidence in presenting and explaining AI topics to their students and facilitating and supporting students around AI concepts increased significantly. Teachers considered several factors (e.g., relevancy of the topics, opportunities for their students, and opportunities for their professional growth) when they were sharing their views on the integration. Additionally, after teachers implemented an AI curriculum into their classrooms, they identified opportunities (e.g., introducing AI-empowered careers and supporting students' critical thinking skills), challenges (e.g., technology issues), and needs for changes (e.g., adding scaffolding activities). Regarding the findings, this study discussed the implications for curriculum developers, ELA teachers, and make suggestions for educational researchers in the field of AI education.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Core curriculum. $3 3559991
650 4 $a Digital literacy. $3 3684664
650 4 $a Continuing education. $3 527504
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0651
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $3 1018772
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-05B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30673797 $z click for full text (PQDT)