東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use./
作者:	Frisk, Emrik Lundin.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (63 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-12B.
標題:	Environmental policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30464631click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379659943

Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use.
Frisk, Emrik Lundin.

Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use. - 1 online resource (63 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Licentiate)--Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden), 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Awareness of the subsurface is in general low and is not a daily concern for decisionmakers. This often results in that decisions on access to subsurface resources instead are guided by a 'first come, first served principle'. This is precarious, as such decisions may lead to intra- and intergenerational conflicts of interest, as utilisation of one subsurface resource at one point in time may inhibit, or severely limit, the utilisation of other subsurface resources in the future, potentially impeding sustainable development.Though not fully developed the concept of geosystem services (GS) has been put forward as a concept that can make these resources more visible and acknowledged in decision-making. However, a systematic literature review of scientific publications on geosystem services was carried out and the emerging picture is that the geosystem services concept is both one of novelty and one of discrepancy, with two prominent definitions: A) GS are abiotic services that are the direct result of the planet's geodiversity, independent of the interactions with biotic nature - there is no differentiation between suprasurface and subsurface features, and B) GS provide benefits specifically resulting from the subsurface. Of the identified geosystem services, 31 out of 39 are listed in the abiotic extension of CICES 5.1 (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services), but some essential services are omitted.To support well-informed decisions on the utilisation of subsurface resources, positive effects need to be weighed against negative effects on a society-wide level, not least regarding effects on the future supply of subsurface resources, or subsurface geosystem services. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a method for providing a basis for such decisions by considering the positive and negative effects on human well-being (i.e., benefits and costs, respectively) on a societal level.In this thesis, a generic CBA rule for assessing subsurface projects is applied to two theoretical cases to show conceptually how CBA can be applied for the prioritisation of competing uses of subsurface resources. The result from these two cases highlights that a systematic mapping of the effects that arise due to subsurface projects, using geosystems services as a point of departure, can make the consequences of such projects more visible and indicate who will be affected. The exemplification shows that a CBA can provide a basis for supporting decisions on prioritising competing subsurface uses, but that there is a need for complementary types of analyses to capture the wide range of benefits the subsurface provides. Finally, some supporting and possibly regulating geosystem services can be either intermediate or final services depending on analytical context, which is important to consider, not least in a CBA to avoid double counting.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379659943Subjects--Topical Terms:

518940
Environmental policy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use.
LDR:04297nmm a2200445K 4500 001 2364412
005 20231130105253.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379659943
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30464631
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Chalmers_SE534818
035 $a AAI30464631
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Frisk, Emrik Lundin. $3 3705217
245 1 0 $a Geosystem Services to Support Decisions on Subsurface Use.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (63 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Volchko, Yevheniya.
502 $a Thesis (Licentiate)--Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden), 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Awareness of the subsurface is in general low and is not a daily concern for decisionmakers. This often results in that decisions on access to subsurface resources instead are guided by a 'first come, first served principle'. This is precarious, as such decisions may lead to intra- and intergenerational conflicts of interest, as utilisation of one subsurface resource at one point in time may inhibit, or severely limit, the utilisation of other subsurface resources in the future, potentially impeding sustainable development.Though not fully developed the concept of geosystem services (GS) has been put forward as a concept that can make these resources more visible and acknowledged in decision-making. However, a systematic literature review of scientific publications on geosystem services was carried out and the emerging picture is that the geosystem services concept is both one of novelty and one of discrepancy, with two prominent definitions: A) GS are abiotic services that are the direct result of the planet's geodiversity, independent of the interactions with biotic nature - there is no differentiation between suprasurface and subsurface features, and B) GS provide benefits specifically resulting from the subsurface. Of the identified geosystem services, 31 out of 39 are listed in the abiotic extension of CICES 5.1 (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services), but some essential services are omitted.To support well-informed decisions on the utilisation of subsurface resources, positive effects need to be weighed against negative effects on a society-wide level, not least regarding effects on the future supply of subsurface resources, or subsurface geosystem services. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a method for providing a basis for such decisions by considering the positive and negative effects on human well-being (i.e., benefits and costs, respectively) on a societal level.In this thesis, a generic CBA rule for assessing subsurface projects is applied to two theoretical cases to show conceptually how CBA can be applied for the prioritisation of competing uses of subsurface resources. The result from these two cases highlights that a systematic mapping of the effects that arise due to subsurface projects, using geosystems services as a point of departure, can make the consequences of such projects more visible and indicate who will be affected. The exemplification shows that a CBA can provide a basis for supporting decisions on prioritising competing subsurface uses, but that there is a need for complementary types of analyses to capture the wide range of benefits the subsurface provides. Finally, some supporting and possibly regulating geosystem services can be either intermediate or final services depending on analytical context, which is important to consider, not least in a CBA to avoid double counting.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Environmental policy. $3 518940
650 4 $a Ecosystems. $3 595401
650 4 $a Geology. $3 516570
650 4 $a Geomorphology. $3 542703
650 4 $a Planning. $3 552734
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Legislation. $3 766385
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0372
690 $a 0484
690 $a 0438
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0640
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden). $3 1913472
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30464631 $z click for full text (PQDT)