東華大學圖書館 |

Power in Collaborative Governance : = Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Power in Collaborative Governance :/
其他題名:	Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing.
作者:	Qi, Huiting.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (220 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:	Collaboration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29276516click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798841572527

Power in Collaborative Governance : = Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing.
Qi, Huiting.

Power in Collaborative Governance :Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing. - 1 online resource (220 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Despite collaborative advantages advocated by literature, there are still many challenges facing by both scholars and practitioners in collaborative governance. In order to further understand challenges, scholars increasingly study different factors contributing to these challenges and find that the paradoxical nature of collaborative governance is an important one. Based on a systematic review of literature on collaborative governance in a paradox lens, I developed a framework consisting of 12 paradoxes and found many paradoxes are linked to power issues in different ways. Power is believed as a significant research area in collaborative governance yet relevant studies are very limited. To fill the gap, this dissertation analyzes power issue in collaborative governance through three research projects, which provide three approaches to interpreting and handling power issues in collaborative governance, including contingency approach, dyadic approach, and multidimensional approach. The first study on power in this dissertation is a conceptual study. The research question of this study is: What is the relationship between power sharing and effective collaborative governance? It proposes a contingency framework on power sharing in collaborative governance. This framework includes six contingency factors of power sharing from contextual, network, and node perspectives. The focus is about how each contingency factor influences the relationship between power sharing and the effectiveness of collaborative governance. The study suggests that, instead of focusing on the attempt to share power in collaboration, it will be more fruitful to design and implement collaborative arrangements based on dynamic contingencies. Focusing on the individual role of power is insufficient to cope with challenges facing power sharing in collaborative governance, such as lack of trust, participants' reluctance, and inaction in sharing power. These unsolved challenges inspire me to study power from a dyadic perspective by linking power with some other key factors in collaborative governance. The second study on power goes beyond power itself by linking power with trust as another important mechanism in collaborative governance. Trust is selected since power and trust are functionally equivalent alternative mechanisms in coordinating communication and interaction. Both power and trust have the function of control in social interaction (Reed, 2001), and investigating their relationship can provide new insights for the management of power relationship and trust relationship in collaborative governance. The research question of the second study is: What is the relationship between power and trust in collaborative governance? A conceptual analysis is conducted to study the dyadic relationship between power and trust in collaborative governance regarding the shared sources of power and trust, the effects of power asymmetry and power sharing on trust building, and the influence of trust building on the management of power relationship in collaborative governance. It helps improve the management of power relationship by taking advantage of the underlying relationships between different dimensions of power and trust. The third study explores approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance, and the research question of this study is: What are the approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance? Power sharing is highly advocated in collaboration. However, how to enhance power sharing in collaborative governance is not well understood. Based on a case study on power sharing in a new collaboration-based governance mechanism for rural China, this article explores how power sharing is enhanced with the engagement of a new collaborator in the governing process. The findings indicate four approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance, including diffusing the source of power, increasing the type of power, expanding the arena for power, and ameliorating the outcome of power. This study offers a model for enhancing power sharing by considering multiple dimensions of power in collaborative governance.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798841572527Subjects--Topical Terms:

3556296
Collaboration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Power in Collaborative Governance : = Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing.
LDR:05498nmm a2200337K 4500 001 2364217
005 20231130104159.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798841572527
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29276516
035 $a (MiAaPQ)PennState_22896huq104
035 $a AAI29276516
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Qi, Huiting. $3 3705021
245 1 0 $a Power in Collaborative Governance : $b Contingencies of Power Sharing, Relationships Between Power and Trust, and Approaches to Enhancing Power Sharing.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (220 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Ran, Bing.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Despite collaborative advantages advocated by literature, there are still many challenges facing by both scholars and practitioners in collaborative governance. In order to further understand challenges, scholars increasingly study different factors contributing to these challenges and find that the paradoxical nature of collaborative governance is an important one. Based on a systematic review of literature on collaborative governance in a paradox lens, I developed a framework consisting of 12 paradoxes and found many paradoxes are linked to power issues in different ways. Power is believed as a significant research area in collaborative governance yet relevant studies are very limited. To fill the gap, this dissertation analyzes power issue in collaborative governance through three research projects, which provide three approaches to interpreting and handling power issues in collaborative governance, including contingency approach, dyadic approach, and multidimensional approach. The first study on power in this dissertation is a conceptual study. The research question of this study is: What is the relationship between power sharing and effective collaborative governance? It proposes a contingency framework on power sharing in collaborative governance. This framework includes six contingency factors of power sharing from contextual, network, and node perspectives. The focus is about how each contingency factor influences the relationship between power sharing and the effectiveness of collaborative governance. The study suggests that, instead of focusing on the attempt to share power in collaboration, it will be more fruitful to design and implement collaborative arrangements based on dynamic contingencies. Focusing on the individual role of power is insufficient to cope with challenges facing power sharing in collaborative governance, such as lack of trust, participants' reluctance, and inaction in sharing power. These unsolved challenges inspire me to study power from a dyadic perspective by linking power with some other key factors in collaborative governance. The second study on power goes beyond power itself by linking power with trust as another important mechanism in collaborative governance. Trust is selected since power and trust are functionally equivalent alternative mechanisms in coordinating communication and interaction. Both power and trust have the function of control in social interaction (Reed, 2001), and investigating their relationship can provide new insights for the management of power relationship and trust relationship in collaborative governance. The research question of the second study is: What is the relationship between power and trust in collaborative governance? A conceptual analysis is conducted to study the dyadic relationship between power and trust in collaborative governance regarding the shared sources of power and trust, the effects of power asymmetry and power sharing on trust building, and the influence of trust building on the management of power relationship in collaborative governance. It helps improve the management of power relationship by taking advantage of the underlying relationships between different dimensions of power and trust. The third study explores approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance, and the research question of this study is: What are the approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance? Power sharing is highly advocated in collaboration. However, how to enhance power sharing in collaborative governance is not well understood. Based on a case study on power sharing in a new collaboration-based governance mechanism for rural China, this article explores how power sharing is enhanced with the engagement of a new collaborator in the governing process. The findings indicate four approaches to enhancing power sharing in collaborative governance, including diffusing the source of power, increasing the type of power, expanding the arena for power, and ameliorating the outcome of power. This study offers a model for enhancing power sharing by considering multiple dimensions of power in collaborative governance.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Power-sharing. $3 3705022
650 4 $a Social interaction. $3 520415
650 4 $a Egalitarianism. $3 3560117
650 4 $a Ontology. $3 530874
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Rural areas. $3 3560074
650 4 $a Dialectics. $3 3561998
650 4 $a Asymmetry. $3 3562922
650 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0395
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29276516 $z click for full text (PQDT)