東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Downfall of Saul : = A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Downfall of Saul :/
其他題名:	A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25.
作者:	Brockman, Andrew.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (195 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-10A.
標題:	Religious studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347441click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377675266

The Downfall of Saul : = A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25.
Brockman, Andrew.

The Downfall of Saul :A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25. - 1 online resource (195 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation argues for the textual unity of 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25. I claim the source division of 1 Samuel has been mischaracterized within scholarship. I contend that this has caused disparity amongst scholars about the strength of the theory of the Deuteronomistic History. I demonstrate a unity of style between the three pericopes through source-critical methods, additionally, I show a clear and logical progression between the events of the three pericopes in a way that clearly illustrates that they belong to the same narrative. I argue that no other pericopes in 1 Samuel satisfactorily meet the conditions for shared authorship with this narrative. Once the text's unity is demonstrated, I examine it from a literary perspective. Through this I argue that the text is an intentional reframing of the established narrative features of the rejection and death of Saul and the introduction of David. This is meant to provide a countercultural polemic against the characteristic deuteronomistic portrayal of the history of early kingship. This polemic was written by a prophetic author who emphasizes the prophetic role in kingship to a higher degree than elsewhere in 1 Samuel. Lastly, I engage with the one other critical examination of these three pericopes done by John Van Seters: who has a different interpretation of the text than I do. After covering his arguments, I contend that he does not interpret the intention of the author correctly, and thus his understanding of the text is misguided.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377675266Subjects--Topical Terms:

3704917
Religious studies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Downfall of Saul : = A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25.
LDR:04476nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2364123
005 20231130104649.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377675266
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30347441
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_9880vx245
035 $a AAI30347441
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Brockman, Andrew. $3 3704916
245 1 4 $a The Downfall of Saul : $b A Study on 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (195 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kirkpatrick, Patricia G.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation argues for the textual unity of 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25. I claim the source division of 1 Samuel has been mischaracterized within scholarship. I contend that this has caused disparity amongst scholars about the strength of the theory of the Deuteronomistic History. I demonstrate a unity of style between the three pericopes through source-critical methods, additionally, I show a clear and logical progression between the events of the three pericopes in a way that clearly illustrates that they belong to the same narrative. I argue that no other pericopes in 1 Samuel satisfactorily meet the conditions for shared authorship with this narrative. Once the text's unity is demonstrated, I examine it from a literary perspective. Through this I argue that the text is an intentional reframing of the established narrative features of the rejection and death of Saul and the introduction of David. This is meant to provide a countercultural polemic against the characteristic deuteronomistic portrayal of the history of early kingship. This polemic was written by a prophetic author who emphasizes the prophetic role in kingship to a higher degree than elsewhere in 1 Samuel. Lastly, I engage with the one other critical examination of these three pericopes done by John Van Seters: who has a different interpretation of the text than I do. After covering his arguments, I contend that he does not interpret the intention of the author correctly, and thus his understanding of the text is misguided.
520 $a Cette these defend l'unite textuelle de 1 Samuel 15:1-16:13 & 28:3-25. Je soutiens que la division des sources de 1 Samuel a ete mal caracterisee par les chercheurs. Je pretends que cette mauvaise caracterisation a cause une disparite parmi les chercheurs sur la force de la theorie de l'Historiographie Deuteronomiste. En utilisant des methodes d'analyses critiques des sources je demontre une unite de style entre les trois pericopes. De plus, je montre une progression claire et logique entre les evenements des trois pericopes d'une maniere qui illustre clairement qu'elles appartiennent au meme recit. Je soutiens qu'aucune autre pericope dans 1 Samuel ne remplit de maniere satisfaisante les conditions d'une redaction partagee avec ce recit. Une fois l'unite du texte demontree, je procede a son examen d'un point de vue litteraire. Par ce biais, je soutiens que le texte est un recadrage intentionnel des aspects narratives qui cherche a etablir le rejet et la mort de Saul et l'introduction de David qui sont destine a fournir une polemique contre-culturelle en opposition a la representation qui caracterise le recit du Deuteronomiste vis-a-vis les premiers rois. Cette polemique a ete ecrite par un auteur prophetique qui souligne le role prophetique dans le domaine de la royaute a un degre plus eleve qu'ailleurs dans 1 Samuel. Finalement, j'examine le seul autre analyse critique de ces trois pericopes, realise par John Van Seters, qui a une interpretation du texte differente de la mienne. Apres avoir couvert ses arguments, je soutiens qu'il n'interprete pas correctement l'intention de l'auteur, et que sa comprehension du texte est donc erronee.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Religious studies. $3 3704917
650 4 $a Historiography. $3 516655
650 4 $a Hebrew Bible. $3 3563333
650 4 $a Religious education. $3 555072
650 4 $a Antiquarian materials. $3 3704918
650 4 $a Literary history. $3 3699603
650 4 $a Old Testament. $3 3563277
650 4 $a Translations. $3 3562010
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Translation studies. $3 3310485
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0527
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0213
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347441 $z click for full text (PQDT)