東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan?/
作者:	Moore, Jonathan Edward.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (251 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-08A.
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30248956click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798371929617

Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan?
Moore, Jonathan Edward.

Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan? - 1 online resource (251 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Amridge University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines the archaeological data from sites within Canaan with the specific goal of examining the historicity of the HB's account of the conquest during the Late Bronze Age. In answering the question of whether archaeology has disproven the HB's account of the conquest, the goal of the author is to dispassionately examine all pertinent archaeological and literary evidence, exploring new evidence and previously undocumented data alongside older remains which were often subjected to liberal bias.To review all the archaeology of the conquest would be impossible; however, the author has targeted five specific sites that best demonstrate the profound verisimilitude of the conquest account in the HB with the archaeological evidence. The specific sites examined in detail include Jericho, Ai (Khirbet el-Maqatir), Mount Ebal, Hazor, and Shiloh. Additionally, the chronology of the Israelite conquest is illuminated through both textual and archaeological sources with the goal of examining the conceivability of Israel's presence within Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. The archeological and literary evidence strongly suggests that Jericho, Ai, and Hazor were occupied, destroyed, and resettled at the specific times and in a manner consistent with the records of the books of Joshua and Judges. Shiloh was settled in the Late Bronze Age IIA (ca. 1406 BC) only to be destroyed, along with the tabernacle, in the Iron Age IB (ca. 1150 BC). A myriad of archaeological and extrabiblical evidences will be explored that demonstrate Israelite occupation of Canaan during the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1400 BC). To echo William Dever (1992, 555), though modern archaeology may call into question the historicity of Joshua and the conquest account, the details produced from the ground continue to provide rather dramatic corroboration of the biblical account, "even in obscure details.".

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798371929617Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Book of JoshuaIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan?
LDR:03224nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2364111
005 20231130104645.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798371929617
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30248956
035 $a AAI30248956
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Moore, Jonathan Edward. $3 3704903
245 1 0 $a Has Archaeology Disproven the Biblical Account of the Conquest of Canaan?
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (251 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Cloud, Rodney.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Amridge University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines the archaeological data from sites within Canaan with the specific goal of examining the historicity of the HB's account of the conquest during the Late Bronze Age. In answering the question of whether archaeology has disproven the HB's account of the conquest, the goal of the author is to dispassionately examine all pertinent archaeological and literary evidence, exploring new evidence and previously undocumented data alongside older remains which were often subjected to liberal bias.To review all the archaeology of the conquest would be impossible; however, the author has targeted five specific sites that best demonstrate the profound verisimilitude of the conquest account in the HB with the archaeological evidence. The specific sites examined in detail include Jericho, Ai (Khirbet el-Maqatir), Mount Ebal, Hazor, and Shiloh. Additionally, the chronology of the Israelite conquest is illuminated through both textual and archaeological sources with the goal of examining the conceivability of Israel's presence within Canaan during the Late Bronze Age. The archeological and literary evidence strongly suggests that Jericho, Ai, and Hazor were occupied, destroyed, and resettled at the specific times and in a manner consistent with the records of the books of Joshua and Judges. Shiloh was settled in the Late Bronze Age IIA (ca. 1406 BC) only to be destroyed, along with the tabernacle, in the Iron Age IB (ca. 1150 BC). A myriad of archaeological and extrabiblical evidences will be explored that demonstrate Israelite occupation of Canaan during the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1400 BC). To echo William Dever (1992, 555), though modern archaeology may call into question the historicity of Joshua and the conquest account, the details produced from the ground continue to provide rather dramatic corroboration of the biblical account, "even in obscure details.".
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
653 $a Book of Joshua
653 $a Book of Judges
653 $a Canaanites
653 $a Conquest
653 $a Old Testament
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0324
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Amridge University. $b Biblical Studies. $3 3692349
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-08A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30248956 $z click for full text (PQDT)