東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45./
作者:	Hughes, Leslie G., III.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (194 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-07A.
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29999145click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798368436906

An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45.
Hughes, Leslie G., III.

An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45. - 1 online resource (194 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this research was to use the interpretive insights from textual criticism, social-science criticism, and narrative criticism in an integrated manner to see whether such an integration might help clarify the interpretive tensions in Mark 1:40-45. The research sought to answer the question, how might an integrated methodology that combines textual, social-scientific, and narrative criticisms help resolve or at least illuminate some of the exegetical questions surrounding Mark 1:40-45? The thesis driving this research was that an intentional integration of text-critical, social-science, and narrative methods would help illuminate the historical meaning of Mark 1:40-45, thereby helping to overcome the "difficulties" found within these three methods when used separately or at least without much integration with other methodologies. The integration of the findings of textual, social-scientific, and narrative methodologies as applied to the interpretation of Mark 1:40-45 will strengthen the argument in favor of the reading of "moved by compassion" in Mark 1:41, provide a stronger case for the social impact of Jesus touching the leper in Mark 1:41-42, and favor a narrative understanding that the leper did go to the priests. After an initial overview of the Mk 1:40-45 text using each of the above methodologies, the text was examined to see what an integrative approach might contribute to resolving the interpretive issues left unresolved by the individual methods. The result was that the textual criticism findings were re-evaluated through the lens of the social-science and narrative insights, social-scientific findings through textual and narrative insights, and narrative findings through social-scientific and textual insights. The integration of these three methodologies reinforced the reading of a compassionate Jesus versus the angry Jesus of the Western tradition. The integration also added strength to the argument that Jesus retreated to the desolate place due to his popularity and not his unclean status. And finally, the integration of the three methodologies created a better literary flow for understanding Mark 1:45. Overall, the hypothesis was supported in that the integrative approach strengthened the interpretation of the pericope by resolving some of the arguments for the angry Jesus, highlighting the overlooked social role of Jesus touching the leper, and clarifying the reasons for Jesus going into the desolate places, albeit with a change in some of the narrative flow that led to this conclusion.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798368436906Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Book of MarkIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45.
LDR:03774nmm a2200325K 4500 001 2364091
005 20231130104638.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798368436906
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29999145
035 $a AAI29999145
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hughes, Leslie G., III. $3 3704884
245 1 3 $a An Integrated Methodological Approach to the Interpretation of Mark 1:40-45.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (194 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Warren, William.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this research was to use the interpretive insights from textual criticism, social-science criticism, and narrative criticism in an integrated manner to see whether such an integration might help clarify the interpretive tensions in Mark 1:40-45. The research sought to answer the question, how might an integrated methodology that combines textual, social-scientific, and narrative criticisms help resolve or at least illuminate some of the exegetical questions surrounding Mark 1:40-45? The thesis driving this research was that an intentional integration of text-critical, social-science, and narrative methods would help illuminate the historical meaning of Mark 1:40-45, thereby helping to overcome the "difficulties" found within these three methods when used separately or at least without much integration with other methodologies. The integration of the findings of textual, social-scientific, and narrative methodologies as applied to the interpretation of Mark 1:40-45 will strengthen the argument in favor of the reading of "moved by compassion" in Mark 1:41, provide a stronger case for the social impact of Jesus touching the leper in Mark 1:41-42, and favor a narrative understanding that the leper did go to the priests. After an initial overview of the Mk 1:40-45 text using each of the above methodologies, the text was examined to see what an integrative approach might contribute to resolving the interpretive issues left unresolved by the individual methods. The result was that the textual criticism findings were re-evaluated through the lens of the social-science and narrative insights, social-scientific findings through textual and narrative insights, and narrative findings through social-scientific and textual insights. The integration of these three methodologies reinforced the reading of a compassionate Jesus versus the angry Jesus of the Western tradition. The integration also added strength to the argument that Jesus retreated to the desolate place due to his popularity and not his unclean status. And finally, the integration of the three methodologies created a better literary flow for understanding Mark 1:45. Overall, the hypothesis was supported in that the integrative approach strengthened the interpretation of the pericope by resolving some of the arguments for the angry Jesus, highlighting the overlooked social role of Jesus touching the leper, and clarifying the reasons for Jesus going into the desolate places, albeit with a change in some of the narrative flow that led to this conclusion.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
653 $a Book of Mark
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0321
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. $b Biblical Studies. $3 3681431
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29999145 $z click for full text (PQDT)