東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Constructing Our Moral World : = Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Constructing Our Moral World :/
其他題名:	Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard.
作者:	Fyfe, Andrew Thomas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (163 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30317442click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379761172

Constructing Our Moral World : = Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard.
Fyfe, Andrew Thomas.

Constructing Our Moral World :Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard. - 1 online resource (163 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Kantian ethicists maintain that morality applies to all agents irrespective of an agent's particular circumstances, interests, or concerns. That is, morality applies to an agent categorically rather than hypothetically. Kantian ethics attempts to prove this categoricity by deriving morality from the constitutive conditions of action. If such an argument could be made to work, then morality would follow from the constitutive preconditions or "logic" of agency and thereby apply categorically to all agents regardless of unique eccentricities concerning an agent's particular circumstances or interests. As a result, an argument for Kantian ethics typically adheres to the following formula: (1) providing a theory of agency that (2) entails that all agents are committed to a Kantian ethical outlook.My focus in this dissertation is one of these arguments for Kantian ethics. Specifically, the argument of Christine Korsgaard. I cannot fully defend her argument here in its entirety, but with this dissertation I hope to provide the background work developing the necessary theory of agency in order for Korsgaard's argument for Kantian ethics to succeed. Specifically, I aim to put forward, develop, and defend the sort of non-standard, teleological theory of agency upon which Korsgaard's argument for Kantian ethics crucially depends. Moreover, with this dissertation I aim to attack the more widely accepted Davidsonian, causalist theory of agency which Korsgaard's Aristotelian-Wittegenstienian-Anscombian teleological theory of agency opposes and I argue we should adopt instead.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379761172Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Kantian ethicsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Constructing Our Moral World : = Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard.
LDR:02933nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2363640
005 20231127093608.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379761172
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30317442
035 $a AAI30317442
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Fyfe, Andrew Thomas. $3 3704414
245 1 0 $a Constructing Our Moral World : $b Agency, Teleology, and Korsgaard.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (163 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kerstein, Samuel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Kantian ethicists maintain that morality applies to all agents irrespective of an agent's particular circumstances, interests, or concerns. That is, morality applies to an agent categorically rather than hypothetically. Kantian ethics attempts to prove this categoricity by deriving morality from the constitutive conditions of action. If such an argument could be made to work, then morality would follow from the constitutive preconditions or "logic" of agency and thereby apply categorically to all agents regardless of unique eccentricities concerning an agent's particular circumstances or interests. As a result, an argument for Kantian ethics typically adheres to the following formula: (1) providing a theory of agency that (2) entails that all agents are committed to a Kantian ethical outlook.My focus in this dissertation is one of these arguments for Kantian ethics. Specifically, the argument of Christine Korsgaard. I cannot fully defend her argument here in its entirety, but with this dissertation I hope to provide the background work developing the necessary theory of agency in order for Korsgaard's argument for Kantian ethics to succeed. Specifically, I aim to put forward, develop, and defend the sort of non-standard, teleological theory of agency upon which Korsgaard's argument for Kantian ethics crucially depends. Moreover, with this dissertation I aim to attack the more widely accepted Davidsonian, causalist theory of agency which Korsgaard's Aristotelian-Wittegenstienian-Anscombian teleological theory of agency opposes and I argue we should adopt instead.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
653 $a Kantian ethics
653 $a Korsgaard, Christine
653 $a Philosophy of action
653 $a Teleology
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0402
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Philosophy. $3 1029753
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30317442 $z click for full text (PQDT)