東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology : = Relation as the Ground of Being.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology :/
其他題名:	Relation as the Ground of Being.
作者:	Filler, James S.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (408 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28499316click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798544226215

Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology : = Relation as the Ground of Being.
Filler, James S.

Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology :Relation as the Ground of Being. - 1 online resource (408 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

The history of philosophy has been haunted by a singular dilemma manifesting itself in two ways. Metaphysically, it manifests as the One/Many problem: if Being is primarily one, then how do we account for multiplicity, if, however, it is fundamentally many, then how can there be any unity, which is required both for knowledge and for things to exist as things? Epistemologically, the problem manifests in Subject/Object Dualism: if knowledge is the function of a rational agent's consciousness, then how can we bridge the gap between the subjective and objective worlds? Heidegger argues that the traditional ontology of "substance" which gives rise to these problems, and in response, Heidegger reevaluates the fundamental conception of Being, re-discovering the ontological significance of relationality; an ontological significance which, historically, is reflected in Neoplatonic thought.Examining this re-discovery is my core project, and this requires engaging in two interrelated tasks. The fundamental task is to show that Heidegger is, in fact, recovering a relational ontology. This requires a close examination of Heidegger's work to show that his ontology entails such a primordial relationality. I do this through a close reading of Being and Time which shows this relational ontology in inchoate form. Heidegger develops this relational ontology further, although still in implicit terms, in his later works. However, in order to show that Heidegger is recovering a relational ontology, a preliminary task is required. This has two parts. The first involves demonstrating that "relation", following Aristotle's definition of "relation" as dependent upon the things related, has been misconstrued. Determinate being requires a more primordial understanding of relation as grounding the relata rather than depending upon them. The second part requires a historical analysis of two parallel ontologies: the ontology of substance, following Parmenides, and the ontology of relationality, following Anaximander and Heraclitus, which later develops into Neoplatonism.From this, I show that Heidegger is recovering or returning to, rather than inventing, a relational ontology which traces its roots back through the Neoplatonic tradition to Plato and ultimately to the Presocratics.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798544226215Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

HeideggerIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology : = Relation as the Ground of Being.
LDR:03603nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2363567
005 20231127093546.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798544226215
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28499316
035 $a AAI28499316
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Filler, James S. $3 3704334
245 1 0 $a Heidegger'S Neoplatonic Ontology : $b Relation as the Ground of Being.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (408 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Stephens, Piers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The history of philosophy has been haunted by a singular dilemma manifesting itself in two ways. Metaphysically, it manifests as the One/Many problem: if Being is primarily one, then how do we account for multiplicity, if, however, it is fundamentally many, then how can there be any unity, which is required both for knowledge and for things to exist as things? Epistemologically, the problem manifests in Subject/Object Dualism: if knowledge is the function of a rational agent's consciousness, then how can we bridge the gap between the subjective and objective worlds? Heidegger argues that the traditional ontology of "substance" which gives rise to these problems, and in response, Heidegger reevaluates the fundamental conception of Being, re-discovering the ontological significance of relationality; an ontological significance which, historically, is reflected in Neoplatonic thought.Examining this re-discovery is my core project, and this requires engaging in two interrelated tasks. The fundamental task is to show that Heidegger is, in fact, recovering a relational ontology. This requires a close examination of Heidegger's work to show that his ontology entails such a primordial relationality. I do this through a close reading of Being and Time which shows this relational ontology in inchoate form. Heidegger develops this relational ontology further, although still in implicit terms, in his later works. However, in order to show that Heidegger is recovering a relational ontology, a preliminary task is required. This has two parts. The first involves demonstrating that "relation", following Aristotle's definition of "relation" as dependent upon the things related, has been misconstrued. Determinate being requires a more primordial understanding of relation as grounding the relata rather than depending upon them. The second part requires a historical analysis of two parallel ontologies: the ontology of substance, following Parmenides, and the ontology of relationality, following Anaximander and Heraclitus, which later develops into Neoplatonism.From this, I show that Heidegger is recovering or returning to, rather than inventing, a relational ontology which traces its roots back through the Neoplatonic tradition to Plato and ultimately to the Presocratics.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Complete works. $3 3704336
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Ontology. $3 530874
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
650 4 $a Leisure. $3 528341
650 4 $a Personhood. $3 888039
650 4 $a Traditions. $3 3562097
650 4 $a Rationality. $3 3562024
650 4 $a Mythology. $3 548085
650 4 $a Philosophers. $3 558041
653 $a Heidegger
653 $a Neoplatonism
653 $a Ontology
653 $a Relationality
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0396
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Georgia. $b Philosophy - PHD. $3 3704335
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28499316 $z click for full text (PQDT)