東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy./
作者:	Good, Joseph E.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (220 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02A.
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415503click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798534661132

Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy.
Good, Joseph E.

Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy. - 1 online resource (220 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

Most policy decisions are channeled through deliberative forums, such as a city council or state legislature. Economic development is a frequent concern in those deliberative forums, as economic development policy can greatly affect the life and livelihood of constituents. Yet the process of economic development policy can be enigmatic, intimidating, and/or inequitable. Accordingly, this dissertation analyzes economic development in localized policy processes and decisions. The driving goal is to better understand and ameliorate policy problems, especially problems of democratic deliberation and legitimacy. Thus, this dissertation joins other works that aim to "illustrate how rhetoric engages advocates and audiences alike to frame public problems and identify policy solutions." This dissertation uses case studies as the basis for qualitative analysis. The case studies are distinct episodes of economic development decisions and campaigns. Rhetorical analysis is the main method of analysis. But this dissertation also honors the goals of a "problem structuring" study, where policy problems are interpreted, organized, and more clearly defined. Furthermore, each case is structured as an ecological study. This intensive observation of past situations and decisions allows a more concentrated focus on policy problems.Chapter one introduces the frame of work, methods, and goals. Chapter two is an intensive look at the economic development policy of Harrisburg, PA from 1999-2003. This centers around an aging trash incinerator and encompasses issues such as environmentalism and social justice. Chapter three observes university-centered economic development. A series of case studies shows how universities employ similar rhetorical appeals to secure funding and investment. Chapter four addresses democratic legitimacy. After defining the term, the case studies of previous chapters are re-analyzed to uncover problems of democratic legitimacy.In using this localized focus and distinct methodology, this dissertation endeavors to ameliorate policy problems in the analyzed cases. Yet these problems are often analogous to policy processes in many other contexts. Therefore, this dissertation is applicable to many policy situations across the country.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798534661132Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DemocracyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy.
LDR:03660nmm a2200433K 4500 001 2363563
005 20231127093544.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798534661132
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28415503
035 $a AAI28415503
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Good, Joseph E. $3 3704330
245 1 0 $a Deliberation and Legitimacy in Economic Development Policy.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (220 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Wible, Scott.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Most policy decisions are channeled through deliberative forums, such as a city council or state legislature. Economic development is a frequent concern in those deliberative forums, as economic development policy can greatly affect the life and livelihood of constituents. Yet the process of economic development policy can be enigmatic, intimidating, and/or inequitable. Accordingly, this dissertation analyzes economic development in localized policy processes and decisions. The driving goal is to better understand and ameliorate policy problems, especially problems of democratic deliberation and legitimacy. Thus, this dissertation joins other works that aim to "illustrate how rhetoric engages advocates and audiences alike to frame public problems and identify policy solutions." This dissertation uses case studies as the basis for qualitative analysis. The case studies are distinct episodes of economic development decisions and campaigns. Rhetorical analysis is the main method of analysis. But this dissertation also honors the goals of a "problem structuring" study, where policy problems are interpreted, organized, and more clearly defined. Furthermore, each case is structured as an ecological study. This intensive observation of past situations and decisions allows a more concentrated focus on policy problems.Chapter one introduces the frame of work, methods, and goals. Chapter two is an intensive look at the economic development policy of Harrisburg, PA from 1999-2003. This centers around an aging trash incinerator and encompasses issues such as environmentalism and social justice. Chapter three observes university-centered economic development. A series of case studies shows how universities employ similar rhetorical appeals to secure funding and investment. Chapter four addresses democratic legitimacy. After defining the term, the case studies of previous chapters are re-analyzed to uncover problems of democratic legitimacy.In using this localized focus and distinct methodology, this dissertation endeavors to ameliorate policy problems in the analyzed cases. Yet these problems are often analogous to policy processes in many other contexts. Therefore, this dissertation is applicable to many policy situations across the country.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Environmental justice. $3 528369
650 4 $a Area planning & development. $3 3172430
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Liberalism. $3 525058
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
653 $a Democracy
653 $a Legitimacy
653 $a Policy
653 $a University
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0341
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0619
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b English Language and Literature. $3 1044091
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28415503 $z click for full text (PQDT)