東華大學圖書館 |

Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition : = Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition :/
其他題名:	Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy.
作者:	Oudes, Dirk.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (262 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05B.
標題:	Culture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29877809click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352982181

Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition : = Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy.
Oudes, Dirk.

Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition :Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy. - 1 online resource (262 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Energy transition and landscape are often considered as zero-sum game: progress for the former equals (perceived) losses for the latter. These perceived losses stem from the transformation of familiar and cherished landscapes. Wind turbines, solar fields and other energy technologies change landscapes, driven by (inter)national energy transition targets to mitigate climate change. Landscapes have specific physical characteristics and are interpreted and experienced differently by people. Especially in areas with high population density, the implications of landscape transformation caused by the energy transition may therefore be severe. Accordingly, landscape is a key arena for the energy transition where the interests, values and concerns of local stakeholders and society at large meet. This arena encompasses diverse stakeholders: local inhabitants, energy cooperatives, NGOs, industry, grid operators, policy makers, decision makers and researchers.Many of these agents disregard or have a limited view on the concept of 'landscape'.'Landscape' is often disregarded in setting energy targets, selecting sites and designing renewable energy projects. Instead, the focus lies on technological performance and cost-efficiency, and societal considerations with regard to landscape are ignored.When 'landscape' is present in the siting and design of renewable energy projects, it is often considered as scenery. Consequently, evaluation of landscape quality of proposals is limited to the effects of energy infrastructure on viewsheds. This overemphasis on the visual aspect of landscape leads to rejecting the proposal or taking interventions that focus on reducing visibility without considering the characteristics of the host landscape. Furthermore, landscape is frequently considered to be in a stable-state. As a result, the current state of the landscape remains unquestioned and is used as the reference point for any potential change. This overemphasis on the present landscape leads to pushing the challenge of the energy transition to communities living somewhere else or in the future.The disregard of landscape and the limited, conventional understanding of landscape disrupts the continuity of the energy transition and has negative consequences for the quality of our landscapes.As a result, both scholars and society at large start to call for an energy transition that includes 'landscape' more prominently in the processes of defining energy targets, designing renewable energy projects and developing energy policies. Physical landscapes start to emerge that are not merely optimized according to technological or economic parameters, but reflect physical landscape characteristics and societal considerations. Examples are multi-purpose solar power plants and 'solar landscapes'. Multi-purpose solar power plants aim to achieve objectives in addition to electricity production such as food production, improving ecological qualities or enabling recreational activities. Key to the concept of 'solar landscapes' is the re-configuring of PV patterns and including agricultural or recreation functions in relationship to characteristics of the existing landscape, or creating new, distinct patterns.Previous research primarily focused on energy technologiesinstead of energy landscapes: technology and landscape arecommonly considered to be separate entities. As early as 1958,British landscape architect Sylvia Crowe advocated in The Power ofLandscape an alternative approach: to start designing 'completelandscapes', instead of mitigating inertia between technologyand landscape.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352982181Subjects--Topical Terms:

517003
Culture.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition : = Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy.
LDR:05115nmm a2200469K 4500 001 2363386
005 20231121104629.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352982181
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29877809
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Wageningen598723
035 $a AAI29877809
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Oudes, Dirk. $3 3704148
245 1 0 $a Landscape-Inclusive Energy Transition : $b Landscape as Catalyst in the Shift to Renewable Energy.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (262 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Stremke, S. ; van den Brink, A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Energy transition and landscape are often considered as zero-sum game: progress for the former equals (perceived) losses for the latter. These perceived losses stem from the transformation of familiar and cherished landscapes. Wind turbines, solar fields and other energy technologies change landscapes, driven by (inter)national energy transition targets to mitigate climate change. Landscapes have specific physical characteristics and are interpreted and experienced differently by people. Especially in areas with high population density, the implications of landscape transformation caused by the energy transition may therefore be severe. Accordingly, landscape is a key arena for the energy transition where the interests, values and concerns of local stakeholders and society at large meet. This arena encompasses diverse stakeholders: local inhabitants, energy cooperatives, NGOs, industry, grid operators, policy makers, decision makers and researchers.Many of these agents disregard or have a limited view on the concept of 'landscape'.'Landscape' is often disregarded in setting energy targets, selecting sites and designing renewable energy projects. Instead, the focus lies on technological performance and cost-efficiency, and societal considerations with regard to landscape are ignored.When 'landscape' is present in the siting and design of renewable energy projects, it is often considered as scenery. Consequently, evaluation of landscape quality of proposals is limited to the effects of energy infrastructure on viewsheds. This overemphasis on the visual aspect of landscape leads to rejecting the proposal or taking interventions that focus on reducing visibility without considering the characteristics of the host landscape. Furthermore, landscape is frequently considered to be in a stable-state. As a result, the current state of the landscape remains unquestioned and is used as the reference point for any potential change. This overemphasis on the present landscape leads to pushing the challenge of the energy transition to communities living somewhere else or in the future.The disregard of landscape and the limited, conventional understanding of landscape disrupts the continuity of the energy transition and has negative consequences for the quality of our landscapes.As a result, both scholars and society at large start to call for an energy transition that includes 'landscape' more prominently in the processes of defining energy targets, designing renewable energy projects and developing energy policies. Physical landscapes start to emerge that are not merely optimized according to technological or economic parameters, but reflect physical landscape characteristics and societal considerations. Examples are multi-purpose solar power plants and 'solar landscapes'. Multi-purpose solar power plants aim to achieve objectives in addition to electricity production such as food production, improving ecological qualities or enabling recreational activities. Key to the concept of 'solar landscapes' is the re-configuring of PV patterns and including agricultural or recreation functions in relationship to characteristics of the existing landscape, or creating new, distinct patterns.Previous research primarily focused on energy technologiesinstead of energy landscapes: technology and landscape arecommonly considered to be separate entities. As early as 1958,British landscape architect Sylvia Crowe advocated in The Power ofLandscape an alternative approach: to start designing 'completelandscapes', instead of mitigating inertia between technologyand landscape.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 541842
650 4 $a Population density. $3 908253
650 4 $a Energy resources. $3 3561090
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Industrial plant emissions. $3 3564812
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Nuclear power plants. $3 645334
650 4 $a Designers. $3 589292
650 4 $a Nuclear energy. $3 539127
650 4 $a Local elections. $3 3564155
650 4 $a Solar energy. $3 520346
650 4 $a Electricity. $3 524507
650 4 $a Fossil fuels. $3 701525
650 4 $a Planning. $3 552734
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Alternative energy sources. $3 3561089
650 4 $a Bridges. $3 868720
650 4 $a Alternative energy. $3 3436775
650 4 $a Atmospheric sciences. $3 3168354
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 860360
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Nuclear engineering. $3 595435
650 4 $a Nuclear physics. $3 517741
650 4 $a Physics. $3 516296
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0725
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0552
690 $a 0756
690 $a 0605
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Wageningen University and Research. $3 3557914
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29877809 $z click for full text (PQDT)