東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance./
作者:	Flynn, Donald F.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (145 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-12B.
標題:	Computer science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29214887click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798802769379

A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance.
Flynn, Donald F.

A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance. - 1 online resource (145 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: B.

Thesis (D.C.S.)--Colorado Technical University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The study problem addressed the lack of a predictive analytic relationship between scholarly impact and research institution performance (Donner et al., 2020). The value in determining a relationship addresses a gap in bibliometrics, the science of quantitatively measuring the productivity and quality of research outcomes. The study leveraged a quantitative nonexperimental correlational design to determine the predictive analytic relationship between the two components. Historically, bibliometrics tends to be author-centric, and the lack of mature bibliometric indicators describing the research institution and the relationship to scholarly impact creates risk for the institution and weakens credibility with evaluation communities (Cox et al., 2019). The study depended on the research question: What is the predictive analytic relationship between scholarly impact and research institution performance? The population for the study leveraged Elsevier Scopus, a leading citation database for scientific literature with over 75 million total records from more than 80,000 institutions. A randomly selected sample set of 385 institutions was adequate to provide a margin of error of 5% at the 95% confidence level. The study used the R programming language to execute regression analysis, resulting in statistical significance for each predictor variable independently on the dependent variable. The findings provided the construction of predictive analytic models and addressed the hypotheses. Lastly, the results included a multiple regression model where analysis of the independent variables found that at F(5, 379) = 4445, p < .000 with an adjusted R2 of 0.983, the model is statistically significant.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798802769379Subjects--Topical Terms:

523869
Computer science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessing scholarly outputIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance.
LDR:03229nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2363123
005 20231116093759.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798802769379
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29214887
035 $a AAI29214887
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Flynn, Donald F. $3 3703870
245 1 2 $a A Correlational Study on the Predictive Relationship Between Scholarly Impact and Research Institution Performance.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (145 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Jenkins, Christopher.
502 $a Thesis (D.C.S.)--Colorado Technical University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The study problem addressed the lack of a predictive analytic relationship between scholarly impact and research institution performance (Donner et al., 2020). The value in determining a relationship addresses a gap in bibliometrics, the science of quantitatively measuring the productivity and quality of research outcomes. The study leveraged a quantitative nonexperimental correlational design to determine the predictive analytic relationship between the two components. Historically, bibliometrics tends to be author-centric, and the lack of mature bibliometric indicators describing the research institution and the relationship to scholarly impact creates risk for the institution and weakens credibility with evaluation communities (Cox et al., 2019). The study depended on the research question: What is the predictive analytic relationship between scholarly impact and research institution performance? The population for the study leveraged Elsevier Scopus, a leading citation database for scientific literature with over 75 million total records from more than 80,000 institutions. A randomly selected sample set of 385 institutions was adequate to provide a margin of error of 5% at the 95% confidence level. The study used the R programming language to execute regression analysis, resulting in statistical significance for each predictor variable independently on the dependent variable. The findings provided the construction of predictive analytic models and addressed the hypotheses. Lastly, the results included a multiple regression model where analysis of the independent variables found that at F(5, 379) = 4445, p < .000 with an adjusted R2 of 0.983, the model is statistically significant.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
653 $a Assessing scholarly output
653 $a Bibliometric indicators
653 $a Citation analysis of institutions
653 $a Predictive bibliometric analysis
653 $a Research institution bibliometrics
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Colorado Technical University. $b Computer Science. $3 3342445
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29214887 $z click for full text (PQDT)