東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19./
作者:	Cisar, John Joseph.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (181 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-12B.
標題:	Information science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29998127click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379612238

Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19.
Cisar, John Joseph.

Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19. - 1 online resource (181 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Using airline 25 pilots due to their uniformity in education, political views, personality traits, and dimensions, an informed grounded theory (GT) studied how the subjects in an information overload environment selected sources and consumed information to create mental models on COVID-19 and make a protective action decision to vaccinate or not. A semi-structured interview guide was used for the Zoom interviews. The developed substantive theory revealed that people's response to an informational overload environment is to limit the amount and type of information vying for their attention. Individuals prefer to accept like-minded information, so most people will limit sources to a similar type of information in what is termed narrowcasting. An individual's mental model of a novel threat or hazard will be formed and anchored by this information flow and previous personal experience. The formed mental model is influenced by the bias and veracity of their information sources. The attention of competing information sources is either accepted or rejected based on the congruence of the new information source with the established mental model and the person's trust in the source of information. More exposure to extreme information and the lack of moderating sources will push and harden the anchor point of a person's mental model to a more extreme position. Most people lack the expertise to identify and process factual information from misinformation to make appropriate risk analysis and protective action decisions. The least skilled in this area tend to be the most confident in their information validation and newly formed mental models. Individuals use impressions and feelings of the information (System 1) to form these mental models instead of analyzing a series of facts (System 2). People make logical action decisions and judgments based on their mental model no matter how extreme or moderate the position is. Appendices contain a comprehensive alphabetical listing of common heuristics and biases and misinformation definitions.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379612238Subjects--Topical Terms:

554358
Information science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Decision-making theoryIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19.
LDR:03538nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2362356
005 20231027104012.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379612238
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29998127
035 $a AAI29998127
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cisar, John Joseph. $3 3703073
245 1 0 $a Evolution of Information and Decision-Making Theory Using Heuristics and Biases to Analyze Pilots' Decision Not to Vaccinate Against COVID-19.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (181 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Murphy, Haley C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Using airline 25 pilots due to their uniformity in education, political views, personality traits, and dimensions, an informed grounded theory (GT) studied how the subjects in an information overload environment selected sources and consumed information to create mental models on COVID-19 and make a protective action decision to vaccinate or not. A semi-structured interview guide was used for the Zoom interviews. The developed substantive theory revealed that people's response to an informational overload environment is to limit the amount and type of information vying for their attention. Individuals prefer to accept like-minded information, so most people will limit sources to a similar type of information in what is termed narrowcasting. An individual's mental model of a novel threat or hazard will be formed and anchored by this information flow and previous personal experience. The formed mental model is influenced by the bias and veracity of their information sources. The attention of competing information sources is either accepted or rejected based on the congruence of the new information source with the established mental model and the person's trust in the source of information. More exposure to extreme information and the lack of moderating sources will push and harden the anchor point of a person's mental model to a more extreme position. Most people lack the expertise to identify and process factual information from misinformation to make appropriate risk analysis and protective action decisions. The least skilled in this area tend to be the most confident in their information validation and newly formed mental models. Individuals use impressions and feelings of the information (System 1) to form these mental models instead of analyzing a series of facts (System 2). People make logical action decisions and judgments based on their mental model no matter how extreme or moderate the position is. Appendices contain a comprehensive alphabetical listing of common heuristics and biases and misinformation definitions.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
653 $a Decision-making theory
653 $a Information overload environment
653 $a Information
653 $a Misinformation
653 $a Action decisions
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Oklahoma State University. $b Fire & Emergency Management Administration. $3 3434337
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29998127 $z click for full text (PQDT)