東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making./
作者:	Burgeno, Jessica Noel.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (112 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-01B.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29253828click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798837530180

The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making.
Burgeno, Jessica Noel.

The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making. - 1 online resource (112 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The goal of this dissertation was to evaluate whether inconsistency is a substantial threat to trust in sequential predictions from a single advisor, and to test whether providing explicit uncertainty estimates can preserve trust in the context of inconsistency. Four experiments were conducted in which participants decided, according to a sequence of snow accumulation forecasts, whether or not they should close schools due to an impending snowstorm. Since prioritizing consistency in weather forecasts can be at a tradeoff to forecast accuracy, Experiments 1-3 used highly controlled forecast stimuli to directly compare the relative effects of inaccuracy and inconsistency on trust. In Experiment 4, findings from the highly controlled experiments were retested and extended with realistic forecast stimuli varying naturally in terms of inaccuracy and inconsistency. In addition, half of participants were randomly assigned to receive reliable uncertainty estimates for a threshold level of snow with the deterministic forecast. Across all four experiments inconsistency was less detrimental to trust than inaccuracy and appeared to confer decision-making benefits. Access to reliable uncertainty estimates amplified these benefits.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798837530180Subjects--Topical Terms:

523881
Cognitive psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Decision-makingIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making.
LDR:02639nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2362330
005 20231027104003.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798837530180
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29253828
035 $a AAI29253828
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Burgeno, Jessica Noel. $3 3703052
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Forecast Inconsistency and Explicit Uncertainty Estimates on Trust and Decision-Making.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (112 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Joslyn, Susan L.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The goal of this dissertation was to evaluate whether inconsistency is a substantial threat to trust in sequential predictions from a single advisor, and to test whether providing explicit uncertainty estimates can preserve trust in the context of inconsistency. Four experiments were conducted in which participants decided, according to a sequence of snow accumulation forecasts, whether or not they should close schools due to an impending snowstorm. Since prioritizing consistency in weather forecasts can be at a tradeoff to forecast accuracy, Experiments 1-3 used highly controlled forecast stimuli to directly compare the relative effects of inaccuracy and inconsistency on trust. In Experiment 4, findings from the highly controlled experiments were retested and extended with realistic forecast stimuli varying naturally in terms of inaccuracy and inconsistency. In addition, half of participants were randomly assigned to receive reliable uncertainty estimates for a threshold level of snow with the deterministic forecast. Across all four experiments inconsistency was less detrimental to trust than inaccuracy and appeared to confer decision-making benefits. Access to reliable uncertainty estimates amplified these benefits.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
653 $a Decision-making
653 $a Forecasts
653 $a Inaccuracy
653 $a Inconsistency
653 $a Trust
653 $a Uncertainty
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0602
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Psychology. $3 2103427
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-01B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29253828 $z click for full text (PQDT)