東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems./
作者:	Legodi, Shaawn.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (58 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-10.
標題:	Public interest. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30360601click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377666578

A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems.
Legodi, Shaawn.

A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems. - 1 online resource (58 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Johannesburg (South Africa), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This study examines the interaction between copyright as protected by the right to property and the concept of parody as protected by the fair use doctrine and the right to freedom of expression - with particular reference to American and South African (SA) legislation and case law. While parody has been recognized as a valid defence and enacted in statutes in some jurisdictions, the South African copyright law has yet to incorporate this defence into its domestic law. In the meantime, there is a gap in South African law that makes it unclear how the courts should address this issue. With the contemporary steep levels of parody output, particularly on the internet, it is critical that the SA legislature addresses this issue sooner rather than later in order to not only conform to the rule of law, but to bring legal certainty.This dissertation examines existing statutory provisions as well as jurisprudence on the application of parody in the United States of America (USA) and South Africa in order to determine which of the two jurisdictions best accommodates modern-day complexities. Because parody is a relatively new form of commentary, the study's conclusion seeks to propose solutions borrowed from the USA law for the application of this defence.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377666578Subjects--Topical Terms:

564929
Public interest.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems.
LDR:02675nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2362227
005 20231027103343.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377666578
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30360601
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Johannesburg501743
035 $a AAI30360601
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Legodi, Shaawn. $3 3702947
245 1 2 $a A Comparative Study of the Approach Followed Towards Parody in the United States of America and South African Copyright Systems.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (58 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
500 $a Advisor: Alberts, Riaan Willem.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Johannesburg (South Africa), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study examines the interaction between copyright as protected by the right to property and the concept of parody as protected by the fair use doctrine and the right to freedom of expression - with particular reference to American and South African (SA) legislation and case law. While parody has been recognized as a valid defence and enacted in statutes in some jurisdictions, the South African copyright law has yet to incorporate this defence into its domestic law. In the meantime, there is a gap in South African law that makes it unclear how the courts should address this issue. With the contemporary steep levels of parody output, particularly on the internet, it is critical that the SA legislature addresses this issue sooner rather than later in order to not only conform to the rule of law, but to bring legal certainty.This dissertation examines existing statutory provisions as well as jurisprudence on the application of parody in the United States of America (USA) and South Africa in order to determine which of the two jurisdictions best accommodates modern-day complexities. Because parody is a relatively new form of commentary, the study's conclusion seeks to propose solutions borrowed from the USA law for the application of this defence.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public interest. $3 564929
650 4 $a Case law. $3 3684068
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Jurisprudence. $3 525061
650 4 $a Fair use. $3 3685002
650 4 $a Legislation. $3 766385
650 4 $a Art. $3 516292
650 4 $a Social criticism & satire. $3 3560841
650 4 $a Defense. $3 3681633
650 4 $a Provisions. $3 3682774
650 4 $a Human rights. $3 527798
650 4 $a Painting. $3 524049
650 4 $a Fine arts. $3 2122690
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a South African studies. $3 3175326
650 4 $a Sub Saharan Africa studies. $3 3172272
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0513
690 $a 0357
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0654
690 $a 0639
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Johannesburg (South Africa). $3 3555351
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-10.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30360601 $z click for full text (PQDT)