東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction : = Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction :/
其他題名:	Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding.
作者:	Miville, Alyssa J.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (103 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-12.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30488189click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379730987

Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction : = Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding.
Miville, Alyssa J.

Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction :Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding. - 1 online resource (103 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

How partners communicate is predictive of relationship processes and outcomes. Self-reports have provided insight into how couples perceive their communication patterns. However, examining partner communication may require an outsider's observation. The Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF) has been a gold standard in dyadic observational research, yet its limitations suggest an alternative approach may be worth exploring. iMotions, an automated facial expression analysis software, relies on research that overlaps with SPAFF's foundation. Thus, the current study examined the convergent and criterion-related validity of the two coding systems using archival data sets of couples engaging in interaction tasks. Bivariate correlations and regression analyses revealed modest support for convergent validity, though both systems demonstrated unique associations across criteria. Overall, findings suggest both systems have utility for analyzing affective communication, though the strengths and limitations of each are presented. More studies are needed comparing iMotions across different contexts and with more diverse populations.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379730987Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CouplesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction : = Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding.
LDR:02544nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2361605
005 20231019095708.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379730987
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30488189
035 $a AAI30488189
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Miville, Alyssa J. $3 3702287
245 1 0 $a Observation of Facial Affect Communicated During Dyadic Interaction : $b Comparing Human Versus Computer Coding.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (103 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12.
500 $a Advisor: Mattson, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a How partners communicate is predictive of relationship processes and outcomes. Self-reports have provided insight into how couples perceive their communication patterns. However, examining partner communication may require an outsider's observation. The Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF) has been a gold standard in dyadic observational research, yet its limitations suggest an alternative approach may be worth exploring. iMotions, an automated facial expression analysis software, relies on research that overlaps with SPAFF's foundation. Thus, the current study examined the convergent and criterion-related validity of the two coding systems using archival data sets of couples engaging in interaction tasks. Bivariate correlations and regression analyses revealed modest support for convergent validity, though both systems demonstrated unique associations across criteria. Overall, findings suggest both systems have utility for analyzing affective communication, though the strengths and limitations of each are presented. More studies are needed comparing iMotions across different contexts and with more diverse populations.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
653 $a Couples
653 $a Dyadic behavior
653 $a Observational coding
653 $a Communication patterns
653 $a Diverse populations
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0602
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a State University of New York at Binghamton. $b Psychology. $3 1278329
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-12.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30488189 $z click for full text (PQDT)