東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms./
Author:	Buie, Hannah.
Description:	1 online resource (132 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-10A.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30422738click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379430283

Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms.
Buie, Hannah.

Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms. - 1 online resource (132 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Over the past several decades, the way we socialize on a day-to-day basis has drastically changed, especially among adolescent and young adult populations. Social media platforms and online social interactions now dominate individuals' daily time spent socializing with others, relative to in-person interactions (American Time Use Survey, 2019). Accordingly, the substance of these online interacts has a growing importance to individuals' wellbeing (Tynes, et al., 2015). Unfortunately, sexism and objectification of women are rampant on social media platforms (Bell, et al., 2018; Davis, 2018; Drakett, et al., 2018; Fox, et al., 2015). Informed by theories of ambivalent sexism, objectification, and social identity, this dissertation investigated how encountering gender bias on social media platforms affects women in several domains of wellbeing. Study 1 created an open-access database of social media content and comments, which were used as stimuli in later studies. Study 2 launched an initial investigation of two important variables underlying the developing project hypotheses: that encountering gender bias online is associated with anticipating subsequent bias, which is linked to social identity threat. Studies 3 and 4 documented the causal impact of encountering sexist content on social media platforms. While the specific outcome variables vary slightly across studies, the predicted psychological process is similar: Encountering sexism on social media platforms leads to detrimental outcomes for women. The findings generally supported this prediction, showing that after encountering sexist content, women experience heightened depression, anxiety, anticipated bias, lower view of future possible selves, and a reduced desire to use the social media platform in the future.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379430283Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

GenderIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms.
LDR:03211nmm a2200433K 4500 001 2361088
005 20231024102929.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379430283
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30422738
035 $a AAI30422738
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Buie, Hannah. $3 3701739
245 1 0 $a Did They Really Just Say That? Sexism on Social Media Platforms.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (132 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Croft, Alyssa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Over the past several decades, the way we socialize on a day-to-day basis has drastically changed, especially among adolescent and young adult populations. Social media platforms and online social interactions now dominate individuals' daily time spent socializing with others, relative to in-person interactions (American Time Use Survey, 2019). Accordingly, the substance of these online interacts has a growing importance to individuals' wellbeing (Tynes, et al., 2015). Unfortunately, sexism and objectification of women are rampant on social media platforms (Bell, et al., 2018; Davis, 2018; Drakett, et al., 2018; Fox, et al., 2015). Informed by theories of ambivalent sexism, objectification, and social identity, this dissertation investigated how encountering gender bias on social media platforms affects women in several domains of wellbeing. Study 1 created an open-access database of social media content and comments, which were used as stimuli in later studies. Study 2 launched an initial investigation of two important variables underlying the developing project hypotheses: that encountering gender bias online is associated with anticipating subsequent bias, which is linked to social identity threat. Studies 3 and 4 documented the causal impact of encountering sexist content on social media platforms. While the specific outcome variables vary slightly across studies, the predicted psychological process is similar: Encountering sexism on social media platforms leads to detrimental outcomes for women. The findings generally supported this prediction, showing that after encountering sexist content, women experience heightened depression, anxiety, anticipated bias, lower view of future possible selves, and a reduced desire to use the social media platform in the future.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Physiological psychology. $3 2144820
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
650 4 $a Gender studies. $3 2122708
653 $a Gender
653 $a Physiology
653 $a Prejudice
653 $a Sexism
653 $a Social media
653 $a Online social interactions
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0989
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0733
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Psychology. $3 1264589
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30422738 $z click for full text (PQDT)