東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking./
作者:	O'Neill, Cameron.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (84 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-03B.
標題:	Higher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30556152click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798380259767

Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking.
O'Neill, Cameron.

Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking. - 1 online resource (84 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

University rankings have become an important part of the admissions processes and their audience has grown substantially over the last two decades. Yet there is still a lack of cover- age for graduate programs outside of business, law and medical school. One of the eminent rankings is the U.S. News & World Report, which has begun ranking graduate programs through peer assessment survey data which relies heavily on institutional reputation. The purpose of the study was to estimate the difference between a perception-based ranking measured through the USNWR rankings and a research-based ranking measured through Google Scholar metrics for 96 graduate statistics department within the United States. Ad- ditionally, the researcher sought to examine the underlying bias that might be present in the two rankings. A research rank statistic was generated for each department based off the mean of the normalized Google Scholar metrics for each professor within their department. Lastly, a bootstrap sample was conducted and was used to calculate the possible ranges of values departments could take. This was used to determine if a department deviates measurably between its research rank and perception-based rank. The results showed there is a measurable difference between the perception-based ranking and the research-based ranking.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798380259767Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking.
LDR:02806nmm a2200445K 4500 001 2360919
005 20231015185452.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798380259767
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30556152
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Pittsburgh44426
035 $a AAI30556152
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a O'Neill, Cameron. $3 3701561
245 1 0 $a Comparative Analysis of Graduate Statistics Department Using Perception Based Ranking and Research Based Ranking.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (84 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Chen, Kehui; Mentch, Lucas K.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a University rankings have become an important part of the admissions processes and their audience has grown substantially over the last two decades. Yet there is still a lack of cover- age for graduate programs outside of business, law and medical school. One of the eminent rankings is the U.S. News & World Report, which has begun ranking graduate programs through peer assessment survey data which relies heavily on institutional reputation. The purpose of the study was to estimate the difference between a perception-based ranking measured through the USNWR rankings and a research-based ranking measured through Google Scholar metrics for 96 graduate statistics department within the United States. Ad- ditionally, the researcher sought to examine the underlying bias that might be present in the two rankings. A research rank statistic was generated for each department based off the mean of the normalized Google Scholar metrics for each professor within their department. Lastly, a bootstrap sample was conducted and was used to calculate the possible ranges of values departments could take. This was used to determine if a department deviates measurably between its research rank and perception-based rank. The results showed there is a measurable difference between the perception-based ranking and the research-based ranking.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Government grants. $3 3563988
650 4 $a College admissions. $3 3562828
650 4 $a Tuition. $3 3561540
650 4 $a Data science. $3 3689306
650 4 $a University students. $3 3685836
650 4 $a Ethnicity. $3 519288
650 4 $a Secondary school students. $3 3548315
650 4 $a Hirsch index. $3 3683491
650 4 $a Reputations. $3 3562920
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a SAT assessment. $3 3681179
650 4 $a Peers. $3 3435329
650 4 $a Response rates. $3 3564350
650 4 $a Medical research. $2 bicssc $3 1556686
650 4 $a Departments. $3 3683760
650 4 $a Secondary schools. $2 bicssc $3 1556944
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $3 958527
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30556152 $z click for full text (PQDT)