東華大學圖書館 |

Developing Successful Conductors : = A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing Successful Conductors :/
其他題名:	A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses.
作者:	Webb, LaToya Alexandra.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (121 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-08A.
標題:	Historically Black Colleges & Universities. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30272470click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798371942234

Developing Successful Conductors : = A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses.
Webb, LaToya Alexandra.

Developing Successful Conductors :A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses. - 1 online resource (121 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

Few studies have explored feedback methods in undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate the various methods of verbal (spoken/written) and nonverbal feedback and to compare and contrast instructors' perceptions of feedback based on their attributes, school, and course characteristics. Undergraduate instrumental conducting instructors from the College Band Directors National Association (CBDNA), "Conducting Pedagogy" listserve, and the Historically Black Colleges and Universities National Band Directors Consortium (HBCU-NBDC) professional members' email list (N = 109), completed a web-based Qualtrics survey titled "Undergraduate Conducting Feedback" developed from previous studies (Boardman, 2000; Marrs, 2016; Rowe & Wood, 2008). The survey addressed five constructs: School Characteristics, Course Characteristics, Methods of Feedback, Perceptions of Feedback, and Demographic Profile.The following research questions were devised to gain further understanding of undergraduate instrumental conducting courses and the various types of verbal and nonverbal feedback.1. What is the relationship between the types of feedback and class time?2. What is the relationship between the demographic information and the perceptions of feedback?3. Does class size, allotted class time, and years of experience teaching undergraduate instrumental conducting predict perceptions of feedback?4. Based on the different methods of provided feedback, what are the most frequently used course activities in undergraduate instrumental conducting courses?Both descriptive statistics and various parametric inferential statistical analysis tests were used to describe and generalize about undergraduate instrumental conducting instructors. Pearson correlation results indicated no significant relationships between verbal and nonverbal feedback and allotted class time. A series of one-way MANOVA analyses revealed instructors' perceptions of feedback. No significant differences were found for gender, academic title, primary instrument, highest degree earned, institution type, or U.S. region. However, a significant difference was found among instructors' perceptions of nonverbal feedback based on race. Multiple regression analyses determined if class size, allotted class time, and years of experience teaching undergraduate instrumental conducting predicted instructors' perceptions of feedback. Allotted class time was a significant predictor of instructors' perceptions of written feedback. Instructors indicated using "conducting peers" as a course activity more frequently in combination with verbal (spoken/written) and nonverbal feedback.Recommendations for future research include studying undergraduates' perceptions of their conducting instructor's verbal and nonverbal feedback concerning frequency and effectiveness. Another recommendation includes providing conducting workshops and symposiums offering guidance on useful and meaningful verbal and nonverbal feedback. The last recommendation includes encouragement for instructors to seek additional opportunities to learn and become more comfortable with various tools for providing feedback.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798371942234Subjects--Topical Terms:

3563176
Historically Black Colleges & Universities.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Developing Successful Conductors : = A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses.
LDR:04558nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2360853
005 20231015185435.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798371942234
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30272470
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Auburn104157412
035 $a AAI30272470
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Webb, LaToya Alexandra. $3 3701489
245 1 0 $a Developing Successful Conductors : $b A Survey of Feedback Methods for Undergraduate Instrumental Conducting Courses.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (121 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Barry, Nancy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Few studies have explored feedback methods in undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate the various methods of verbal (spoken/written) and nonverbal feedback and to compare and contrast instructors' perceptions of feedback based on their attributes, school, and course characteristics. Undergraduate instrumental conducting instructors from the College Band Directors National Association (CBDNA), "Conducting Pedagogy" listserve, and the Historically Black Colleges and Universities National Band Directors Consortium (HBCU-NBDC) professional members' email list (N = 109), completed a web-based Qualtrics survey titled "Undergraduate Conducting Feedback" developed from previous studies (Boardman, 2000; Marrs, 2016; Rowe & Wood, 2008). The survey addressed five constructs: School Characteristics, Course Characteristics, Methods of Feedback, Perceptions of Feedback, and Demographic Profile.The following research questions were devised to gain further understanding of undergraduate instrumental conducting courses and the various types of verbal and nonverbal feedback.1. What is the relationship between the types of feedback and class time?2. What is the relationship between the demographic information and the perceptions of feedback?3. Does class size, allotted class time, and years of experience teaching undergraduate instrumental conducting predict perceptions of feedback?4. Based on the different methods of provided feedback, what are the most frequently used course activities in undergraduate instrumental conducting courses?Both descriptive statistics and various parametric inferential statistical analysis tests were used to describe and generalize about undergraduate instrumental conducting instructors. Pearson correlation results indicated no significant relationships between verbal and nonverbal feedback and allotted class time. A series of one-way MANOVA analyses revealed instructors' perceptions of feedback. No significant differences were found for gender, academic title, primary instrument, highest degree earned, institution type, or U.S. region. However, a significant difference was found among instructors' perceptions of nonverbal feedback based on race. Multiple regression analyses determined if class size, allotted class time, and years of experience teaching undergraduate instrumental conducting predicted instructors' perceptions of feedback. Allotted class time was a significant predictor of instructors' perceptions of written feedback. Instructors indicated using "conducting peers" as a course activity more frequently in combination with verbal (spoken/written) and nonverbal feedback.Recommendations for future research include studying undergraduates' perceptions of their conducting instructor's verbal and nonverbal feedback concerning frequency and effectiveness. Another recommendation includes providing conducting workshops and symposiums offering guidance on useful and meaningful verbal and nonverbal feedback. The last recommendation includes encouragement for instructors to seek additional opportunities to learn and become more comfortable with various tools for providing feedback.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Historically Black Colleges & Universities. $3 3563176
650 4 $a Musicians & conductors. $3 3556280
650 4 $a Music teachers. $3 3483171
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 2122689
650 4 $a Fine arts. $3 2122690
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
650 4 $a Music education. $3 3168367
650 4 $a Performing arts education. $3 3173434
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0357
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0522
690 $a 0457
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Auburn University. $3 1020457
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-08A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30272470 $z click for full text (PQDT)