東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana : = Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana :/
其他題名:	Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives.
作者:	Schoeffler, Sadie M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (73 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-02.
標題:	Government agencies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29221719click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798841528678

Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana : = Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives.
Schoeffler, Sadie M.

Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana :Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives. - 1 online resource (73 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Since the passing of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA), state governments have implemented similar policies that allow for Native American tribes without federal recognition to petition for the repatriation of human remains and objects significant to their culture (Seidemann, 2010). Per La. R.S. 8:671-681, which is the Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites Preservation Act of 1992 (UBA), the Division of Archaeology in the Louisiana State Office of Cultural Development is responsible for overseeing the protection and preservation of unmarked burials. These burials are often of pre-Columbian or historic cultural and temporal context, which warrants consultation and collaboration with associated descendant communities regarding their disposition. Research shows that collaboration with Native American communities in archaeological investigations ensures ethical research practice and fosters a more holistic repatriation process and treatment of human remains regardless of ethnicity, culture, or date of interment (Colwell-Chanthaphonh&Ferguson, 2004; Colwell-Chanthaphonh et al., 2010). This thesis documents perspectives on the UBA of Native American communities in Louisiana to evaluate its effectiveness in preserving unmarked burials in pre-Columbian context, and to provide an opportunity for critical feedback on the UBA regulatory process. Qualitative data analysis of semi-structured interviews with tribal representatives was employed to document these perspectives. Supplemental data, including records of permits issued in accordance with the UBA, were analyzed to assess permit usage of the UBA since 2010. Results showed that Native American communities who participated in interviews were overall content with consultation and collaboration regarding unmarked burial sites. However, their outlook for long-term protection and preservation was dim due to the lack of control tribes have over sites situated on private property that is covered under the UBA. Concerning the permits, only 2 out of 18 permits issued since 2010 involve burials in pre-Columbian context, demonstrating that the UBA has been applied more frequently in historical context. This research found that tribes need more legal control over unmarked burials to preserve sacred sites properly.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798841528678Subjects--Topical Terms:

3562805
Government agencies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana : = Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives.
LDR:03672nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2359885
005 20230925052622.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798841528678
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29221719
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Louisianagradschool_theses-6580
035 $a AAI29221719
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Schoeffler, Sadie M. $3 3700503
245 1 0 $a Unmarked Human Burial Site Policy in Louisiana : $b Pre-Columbian Context and Community Perspectives.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (73 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
500 $a Advisor: Listi, Ginesse.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Since the passing of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA), state governments have implemented similar policies that allow for Native American tribes without federal recognition to petition for the repatriation of human remains and objects significant to their culture (Seidemann, 2010). Per La. R.S. 8:671-681, which is the Louisiana Unmarked Human Burial Sites Preservation Act of 1992 (UBA), the Division of Archaeology in the Louisiana State Office of Cultural Development is responsible for overseeing the protection and preservation of unmarked burials. These burials are often of pre-Columbian or historic cultural and temporal context, which warrants consultation and collaboration with associated descendant communities regarding their disposition. Research shows that collaboration with Native American communities in archaeological investigations ensures ethical research practice and fosters a more holistic repatriation process and treatment of human remains regardless of ethnicity, culture, or date of interment (Colwell-Chanthaphonh&Ferguson, 2004; Colwell-Chanthaphonh et al., 2010). This thesis documents perspectives on the UBA of Native American communities in Louisiana to evaluate its effectiveness in preserving unmarked burials in pre-Columbian context, and to provide an opportunity for critical feedback on the UBA regulatory process. Qualitative data analysis of semi-structured interviews with tribal representatives was employed to document these perspectives. Supplemental data, including records of permits issued in accordance with the UBA, were analyzed to assess permit usage of the UBA since 2010. Results showed that Native American communities who participated in interviews were overall content with consultation and collaboration regarding unmarked burial sites. However, their outlook for long-term protection and preservation was dim due to the lack of control tribes have over sites situated on private property that is covered under the UBA. Concerning the permits, only 2 out of 18 permits issued since 2010 involve burials in pre-Columbian context, demonstrating that the UBA has been applied more frequently in historical context. This research found that tribes need more legal control over unmarked burials to preserve sacred sites properly.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Government agencies. $3 3562805
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
650 4 $a Native North Americans. $3 3545964
650 4 $a Human remains. $3 3686221
650 4 $a Cemeteries. $3 3682326
650 4 $a Forensic anthropology. $3 791531
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
650 4 $a Physical anthropology. $3 518358
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0324
690 $a 0339
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0327
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. $3 783779
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-02.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29221719 $z click for full text (PQDT)