東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term./
作者:	Atkin, Christopher Anthony.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (256 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-10B.
標題:	Memory. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30394678click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377693963

The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term.
Atkin, Christopher Anthony.

The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term. - 1 online resource (256 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom), 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

Research suggests that visual imagery and visual memory share similar underlying processes. One way to differentiate these processes is to understand if the capacity of imagination and visual memory are the same. To date, limited research has investigated capacity limits in imagination, and directly compared them to that of visual memory. This thesis aimed to provide estimates of imagination capacity and explore how this relates to the capacity of visual memory in the short-term (VMst). Collectively, experiments 1 and 2 explored capacity limits in imagination, visual working memory (VWM) and visual short-term memory (VSTM) using a novel paradigm that for the first time provided comparable estimates of capacity across these tasks. The key finding was that imagination capacity was lower than VWM and VSTM. Experiment 3 manipulated the time available to generate, update and maintain an image (imagination task) or encode, update and maintain an image (VWM task). Time did not influence performance in imagination or VWM. Experiment 4 explored whether the cuing methodology in the imagination task was responsible for worse performance than in the VWM task. None of the manipulations showed any specific influence on the imagination task suggesting this was not an important factor. Experiment 5 investigated whether the decision methodology favoured the memory tasks because of the inclusion of all the stimuli at test. The inclusion of all items benefited VSTM performance, whereas the reverse was true for the VWM task whereby performance was better when only a single item was presented at test. There was no impact on imagination performance. Experiment 6 explored the impact of object complexity on capacity in imagination, VWM and VSTM. Object complexity reduced VSTM capacity to the same level as imagery, however VWM capacity remained higher than imagery. Overall, the findings suggest that imagery is very similar to VWM, in terms of them being impacted similarly by manipulations. However, the capacity findings suggest that they may not be underpinned by identical processes. In contrast, imagery is less similar to VSTM as manipulations impacted these processes differently.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377693963Subjects--Topical Terms:

522110
Memory.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term.
LDR:03470nmm a2200337K 4500 001 2359230
005 20230918120629.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377693963
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30394678
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Nottingham_47913
035 $a AAI30394678
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Atkin, Christopher Anthony. $3 3699821
245 1 4 $a The Same or Different? Capacity Limitations in Visual Imagery Versus Visual Memory in the Short-Term.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (256 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Guest, Duncan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom), 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Research suggests that visual imagery and visual memory share similar underlying processes. One way to differentiate these processes is to understand if the capacity of imagination and visual memory are the same. To date, limited research has investigated capacity limits in imagination, and directly compared them to that of visual memory. This thesis aimed to provide estimates of imagination capacity and explore how this relates to the capacity of visual memory in the short-term (VMst). Collectively, experiments 1 and 2 explored capacity limits in imagination, visual working memory (VWM) and visual short-term memory (VSTM) using a novel paradigm that for the first time provided comparable estimates of capacity across these tasks. The key finding was that imagination capacity was lower than VWM and VSTM. Experiment 3 manipulated the time available to generate, update and maintain an image (imagination task) or encode, update and maintain an image (VWM task). Time did not influence performance in imagination or VWM. Experiment 4 explored whether the cuing methodology in the imagination task was responsible for worse performance than in the VWM task. None of the manipulations showed any specific influence on the imagination task suggesting this was not an important factor. Experiment 5 investigated whether the decision methodology favoured the memory tasks because of the inclusion of all the stimuli at test. The inclusion of all items benefited VSTM performance, whereas the reverse was true for the VWM task whereby performance was better when only a single item was presented at test. There was no impact on imagination performance. Experiment 6 explored the impact of object complexity on capacity in imagination, VWM and VSTM. Object complexity reduced VSTM capacity to the same level as imagery, however VWM capacity remained higher than imagery. Overall, the findings suggest that imagery is very similar to VWM, in terms of them being impacted similarly by manipulations. However, the capacity findings suggest that they may not be underpinned by identical processes. In contrast, imagery is less similar to VSTM as manipulations impacted these processes differently.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Memory. $3 522110
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Visual perception. $3 529664
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). $3 3545894
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-10B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30394678 $z click for full text (PQDT)