東華大學圖書館 |

Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation./
作者:	McKenzie, Hunter Nicholas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (265 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29995539click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798357576941

Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation.
McKenzie, Hunter Nicholas.

Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation. - 1 online resource (265 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

English ditransitive verbs show a complex alternation between the double object construction (DOC, (1)) and prepositional object datives (POD, (2)). This dissertation examines the acquisition, representation, and learnability of the dative alternation among L2 English learners, presenting experimental data from participants with L1 backgrounds of Mandarin Chinese (n = 14), Korean (n = 19), and Spanish (n = 21), as well as L1 English speakers (n = 41). While argument structure alternations have played an important role in L2 acquisition, this study differs from previous work in that it focuses on the abstract syntax of datives.The DOC exhibits an asymmetric structural pattern that has been a key point of discussion in syntactic research (e.g., Citko, Emonds, & Whitney, 2017). A-bar movement (wh-questions and relative clauses) of the goal argument is ungrammatical (3), while A-bar movement of the theme is acceptable (4). Conversely, A-movement of the theme argument is ungrammatical (5) with non-pronominal arguments, while A-movement of the goal (6) is grammatical. Citko, Emonds, and Whitney (2017) have argued that these structural contrasts are best explained through a syntactic derivation of the DOC from the POD that promotes the indirect object to a direct object position. This proposal, based on Emonds (1993), links English DOCs to Marantz's Generalization, a cross-linguistic pattern identified by Baker (1988) in which indirect objects surface productively as applied direct objects.This experiment tests whether L2 learners' grammatical intuitions show the syntactic hallmarks of Marantz's Generalization. Participants judged the acceptability of sentences formed with twelve verbs (give, send, tell, text, buy, make, return, push, say, yell, purchase, create) appearing in each of seven syntactic contexts, which included passives, questions, and relative clauses targeting both direct objects and indirect objects. Acceptability data was analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Notably, both L1 and L2 English speakers showed sensitivity to the ungrammaticality of A-movement of themes and A-bar movement of goals. These results point to a strikingly asymmetric pattern, in which verbs that form double objects productively surface with distinct syntax. Another interaction was identified between L2 English proficiency and rejection of sentences with non-DOC verbs, modeled at the individual participant level, incorporating Stringer's (2010) notion of Lexical Relativity. The syntactic regularity observed across L1 groups thus coexisted with another pattern of lexical variation. The results lend empirical support to syntactically derived accounts of the dative alternation. From an acquisitional perspective, the data are best situated within a theory of L2 acquisition that assumes both pervasive L1 influence at the level of individual lexical items, and adult access to universal grammatical constraints, as proposed in Sprouse's (2006) model of the initial state of L2 acquisition in terms of Relexification.Examples:(1) Mary gave the student a book.(3) *Which student did Mary give a book?(5) *The book was given a student.(2) Mary gave a book to the student.(4) What book did Mary give the student?(6) The student was given a book.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798357576941Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Argument structureIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation.
LDR:04690nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2358748
005 20230824072004.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798357576941
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29995539
035 $a AAI29995539
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McKenzie, Hunter Nicholas. $3 3699293
245 1 0 $a Relexification and Lexical Relativity in the Second Language Acquisition of the Dative Alternation.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (265 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Sprouse, Rex.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a English ditransitive verbs show a complex alternation between the double object construction (DOC, (1)) and prepositional object datives (POD, (2)). This dissertation examines the acquisition, representation, and learnability of the dative alternation among L2 English learners, presenting experimental data from participants with L1 backgrounds of Mandarin Chinese (n = 14), Korean (n = 19), and Spanish (n = 21), as well as L1 English speakers (n = 41). While argument structure alternations have played an important role in L2 acquisition, this study differs from previous work in that it focuses on the abstract syntax of datives.The DOC exhibits an asymmetric structural pattern that has been a key point of discussion in syntactic research (e.g., Citko, Emonds, & Whitney, 2017). A-bar movement (wh-questions and relative clauses) of the goal argument is ungrammatical (3), while A-bar movement of the theme is acceptable (4). Conversely, A-movement of the theme argument is ungrammatical (5) with non-pronominal arguments, while A-movement of the goal (6) is grammatical. Citko, Emonds, and Whitney (2017) have argued that these structural contrasts are best explained through a syntactic derivation of the DOC from the POD that promotes the indirect object to a direct object position. This proposal, based on Emonds (1993), links English DOCs to Marantz's Generalization, a cross-linguistic pattern identified by Baker (1988) in which indirect objects surface productively as applied direct objects.This experiment tests whether L2 learners' grammatical intuitions show the syntactic hallmarks of Marantz's Generalization. Participants judged the acceptability of sentences formed with twelve verbs (give, send, tell, text, buy, make, return, push, say, yell, purchase, create) appearing in each of seven syntactic contexts, which included passives, questions, and relative clauses targeting both direct objects and indirect objects. Acceptability data was analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Notably, both L1 and L2 English speakers showed sensitivity to the ungrammaticality of A-movement of themes and A-bar movement of goals. These results point to a strikingly asymmetric pattern, in which verbs that form double objects productively surface with distinct syntax. Another interaction was identified between L2 English proficiency and rejection of sentences with non-DOC verbs, modeled at the individual participant level, incorporating Stringer's (2010) notion of Lexical Relativity. The syntactic regularity observed across L1 groups thus coexisted with another pattern of lexical variation. The results lend empirical support to syntactically derived accounts of the dative alternation. From an acquisitional perspective, the data are best situated within a theory of L2 acquisition that assumes both pervasive L1 influence at the level of individual lexical items, and adult access to universal grammatical constraints, as proposed in Sprouse's (2006) model of the initial state of L2 acquisition in terms of Relexification.Examples:(1) Mary gave the student a book.(3) *Which student did Mary give a book?(5) *The book was given a student.(2) Mary gave a book to the student.(4) What book did Mary give the student?(6) The student was given a book.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
653 $a Argument structure
653 $a Dative alternation
653 $a Double object construction
653 $a Generative
653 $a Second language acquisition
653 $a Syntax
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Second Language Studies. $3 3190531
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29995539 $z click for full text (PQDT)