東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Arendt's Theory of Judgement.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Arendt's Theory of Judgement./
作者:	Ngarmkham, Nathiya.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (166 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05A.
標題:	Morality. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30158935click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352986783

Arendt's Theory of Judgement.
Ngarmkham, Nathiya.

Arendt's Theory of Judgement. - 1 online resource (166 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kent (United Kingdom), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The thesis proposes a nuanced interpretation of Arendt's concept of judgement based on the close interpretation of key works from late in her oeuvre. It is argued that this provides a new account of the relationship between Arendt's concepts of judgement, action, forgiveness, and promising that have an impact upon how we understand her late work and its application. The central claims of the thesis rest upon the assumption that Arendt considered judgement to be both a political and an ethical faculty, because she understood ethics within a political framework founded upon her concept of "action".The thesis begins with an exploration of her ideas about the faculty of judgement and its relations to the idea of morality and politics. After the explanation of Kant's idea of Geschmacksurteil or the judgement of taste, the thesis discusses the connection between the two thinkers' concepts of judgement, examines Arendt's reading of Kant and justifies her major interpretive claims. The thesis also examines and discusses her concept of action and her ideas of politics and the political through the term politeuesthai which helps not only justify her reading and argument about Kant's theory of judgment but also helps to ground her theory of ethics. The discussion lays a foundation for the debates and arguments about her ideas of ethics in the last chapter.In the discussion about her ethical thoughts, the thesis explores and reviews some literatures concerning Arendt's theory of judgement and debates with key scholars, Kateb, Benhabib and Buckler, on a range of central issues. It also demonstrates the relationship between judgement and the other two ethical concepts, forgiving and promising. Drawing upon debates with respect to transitional justice, it concludes that Arendt's idea of judgement is more fertile than these two ideas when it comes to understanding the application of her political ethics.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352986783Subjects--Topical Terms:

3561985
Morality.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Arendt's Theory of Judgement.
LDR:03124nmm a2200337K 4500 001 2357617
005 20230725053531.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352986783
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30158935
035 $a (MiAaPQ)UnivKentCanterbury97003
035 $a AAI30158935
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ngarmkham, Nathiya. $3 3698151
245 1 0 $a Arendt's Theory of Judgement.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (166 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: MacKenzie, Iain.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kent (United Kingdom), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The thesis proposes a nuanced interpretation of Arendt's concept of judgement based on the close interpretation of key works from late in her oeuvre. It is argued that this provides a new account of the relationship between Arendt's concepts of judgement, action, forgiveness, and promising that have an impact upon how we understand her late work and its application. The central claims of the thesis rest upon the assumption that Arendt considered judgement to be both a political and an ethical faculty, because she understood ethics within a political framework founded upon her concept of "action".The thesis begins with an exploration of her ideas about the faculty of judgement and its relations to the idea of morality and politics. After the explanation of Kant's idea of Geschmacksurteil or the judgement of taste, the thesis discusses the connection between the two thinkers' concepts of judgement, examines Arendt's reading of Kant and justifies her major interpretive claims. The thesis also examines and discusses her concept of action and her ideas of politics and the political through the term politeuesthai which helps not only justify her reading and argument about Kant's theory of judgment but also helps to ground her theory of ethics. The discussion lays a foundation for the debates and arguments about her ideas of ethics in the last chapter.In the discussion about her ethical thoughts, the thesis explores and reviews some literatures concerning Arendt's theory of judgement and debates with key scholars, Kateb, Benhabib and Buckler, on a range of central issues. It also demonstrates the relationship between judgement and the other two ethical concepts, forgiving and promising. Drawing upon debates with respect to transitional justice, it concludes that Arendt's idea of judgement is more fertile than these two ideas when it comes to understanding the application of her political ethics.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Morality. $3 3561985
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Kent (United Kingdom). $3 3642032
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30158935 $z click for full text (PQDT)