東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation./
作者:	Yin, Yian.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (226 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02B.
標題:	Systems science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29325024click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798845400758

Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation.
Yin, Yian.

Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation. - 1 online resource (226 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The increasing availability of large-scale scholarly datasets offers an unprecedented opportunity to understand the fundamental predictability, uncertainty, and dynamics of science and innovation. In this dissertation, I present some of my contributions to the science of science and innovation in three distinct but related settings, through a combination of canonical social science theories, large-scale datasets of science and technology, and mathematical modeling tools. First, I study the quantitative patterns of repeated attempts by NIH investigators, business innovators, and terrorist organizations to build a simple mechanistic model of failure dynamics. The model highlights a novel phase transition that separates failure dynamics into regions of stagnation or progression, predicting that near a tipping point, agents who share similar characteristics and learning strategies may experience fundamentally different outcomes following failures. The model further makes several empirically testable predictions about the failure dynamics, all of which are systematically verified across all three datasets. Second, I use COVID-19 as an example to study how policy and science respond to global emergencies. I find close coevolution between COVID-19-related science and policy, where many policy documents in the COVID-19 pandemic substantially access recent, peer-reviewed, and high-impact science, and policy documents that cite science are especially highly cited within the policy domain. Yet at the same time, there is heterogeneity across policy-making institutions, where the tendency for policy documents to cite science appears mostly concentrated within intergovernmental organizations and much less so in national governments. Lastly, I study the public use and funding of science, by linking tens of millions of scientific publications from all scientific fields to their upstream funding support and downstream public uses across three public domains-government documents, news media, and marketplace invention. I find public uses of science present a rich landscape of specialized consumption, yet, collectively, what the public uses and what scientists themselves use are closely consistent, and the funding of science closely tracks quantifiable public use, highlighting a remarkable alignment between scientific use, public use and funding.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798845400758Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168411
Systems science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Marketplace inventionIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation.
LDR:03704nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2357588
005 20230725053522.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798845400758
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29325024
035 $a AAI29325024
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Yin, Yian. $3 3698122
245 1 0 $a Essays on the Science of Science and Innovation.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (226 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Wang, Dashun; Contractor, Noshir.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The increasing availability of large-scale scholarly datasets offers an unprecedented opportunity to understand the fundamental predictability, uncertainty, and dynamics of science and innovation. In this dissertation, I present some of my contributions to the science of science and innovation in three distinct but related settings, through a combination of canonical social science theories, large-scale datasets of science and technology, and mathematical modeling tools. First, I study the quantitative patterns of repeated attempts by NIH investigators, business innovators, and terrorist organizations to build a simple mechanistic model of failure dynamics. The model highlights a novel phase transition that separates failure dynamics into regions of stagnation or progression, predicting that near a tipping point, agents who share similar characteristics and learning strategies may experience fundamentally different outcomes following failures. The model further makes several empirically testable predictions about the failure dynamics, all of which are systematically verified across all three datasets. Second, I use COVID-19 as an example to study how policy and science respond to global emergencies. I find close coevolution between COVID-19-related science and policy, where many policy documents in the COVID-19 pandemic substantially access recent, peer-reviewed, and high-impact science, and policy documents that cite science are especially highly cited within the policy domain. Yet at the same time, there is heterogeneity across policy-making institutions, where the tendency for policy documents to cite science appears mostly concentrated within intergovernmental organizations and much less so in national governments. Lastly, I study the public use and funding of science, by linking tens of millions of scientific publications from all scientific fields to their upstream funding support and downstream public uses across three public domains-government documents, news media, and marketplace invention. I find public uses of science present a rich landscape of specialized consumption, yet, collectively, what the public uses and what scientists themselves use are closely consistent, and the funding of science closely tracks quantifiable public use, highlighting a remarkable alignment between scientific use, public use and funding.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
653 $a Marketplace invention
653 $a News Media
653 $a Global emergencies
653 $a Predictability
653 $a Terrorism
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences. $3 1023502
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29325024 $z click for full text (PQDT)