東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings./
作者:	Nguyen, Anthony.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (101 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-05.
標題:	Biomechanics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29328013click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798357531094

The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings.
Nguyen, Anthony.

The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings. - 1 online resource (101 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Lateral ankle sprains are common injuries in cheerleading and typically occurring during tumbling. The landing surface can impact injury risk by modulating loading parameters and risky joint positions. Most surface-landing studies have used vertical landing tasks to study acrobatic populations, and few studies have compared vertical and flipping tasks. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two cheerleading surfaces between vertical drop landing and flip landing tasks. Doing so explained surface characteristic influences on landing and the validity of using vertical landing tasks to represent acrobatic sports. Twelve collegiate cheerleaders (7 females, 5 males; age: 21.0 ± 2.5 years; mass: 64.5 ± 14.5 kg; height: 1.7 ± 0.1 m) performed flip (FLIP) and vertical (VERT) landing tasks over a harder (HARD) and matted (MAT) surface. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected, and sagittal and frontal plane kinematic and kinetic variables were extracted during landing. Repeated measures ANOVAs (task x surface) were conducted to determine task and surface effects (p < .05). The FLIP task caused significantly greater impact peaks and loading rates, greater knee flexion at IC, peak knee extension and abduction moments, greater ankle plantar flexion and eversion moments, and less ankle plantar flexion at IC. There was greater vertical foot velocity at IC during FLIP tasks which was primarily due to angular velocity, and it likely explains the greater loading characteristics during FLIP tasks. The HARD surface landing caused significantly greater loading rates, greater knee flexion and ankle inversion at IC. Sagittal ankle moments had a significant task and surface interaction (p = .006), but no joint moment surface effects were observed. These indicated that FLIP and VERT tasks are significantly different due to angular components. The larger forces and joint stress observed in flipping places individuals at greater risk for ankle injuries. Flipping on a harder surface also introduced higher risks. The theory that landing on harder surfaces increases injury risk is supported. These results also caution individuals when generalizing vertical landings to acrobatic populations.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798357531094Subjects--Topical Terms:

548685
Biomechanics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

CheerleadingIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings.
LDR:03624nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2356786
005 20230619080113.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798357531094
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29328013
035 $a AAI29328013
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Nguyen, Anthony. $3 3697288
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Cheerleading Surfaces on Landing Characteristics During Vertical and Flip Landings.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (101 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05.
500 $a Advisor: O'Connor, Kristian M.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Lateral ankle sprains are common injuries in cheerleading and typically occurring during tumbling. The landing surface can impact injury risk by modulating loading parameters and risky joint positions. Most surface-landing studies have used vertical landing tasks to study acrobatic populations, and few studies have compared vertical and flipping tasks. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two cheerleading surfaces between vertical drop landing and flip landing tasks. Doing so explained surface characteristic influences on landing and the validity of using vertical landing tasks to represent acrobatic sports. Twelve collegiate cheerleaders (7 females, 5 males; age: 21.0 ± 2.5 years; mass: 64.5 ± 14.5 kg; height: 1.7 ± 0.1 m) performed flip (FLIP) and vertical (VERT) landing tasks over a harder (HARD) and matted (MAT) surface. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected, and sagittal and frontal plane kinematic and kinetic variables were extracted during landing. Repeated measures ANOVAs (task x surface) were conducted to determine task and surface effects (p < .05). The FLIP task caused significantly greater impact peaks and loading rates, greater knee flexion at IC, peak knee extension and abduction moments, greater ankle plantar flexion and eversion moments, and less ankle plantar flexion at IC. There was greater vertical foot velocity at IC during FLIP tasks which was primarily due to angular velocity, and it likely explains the greater loading characteristics during FLIP tasks. The HARD surface landing caused significantly greater loading rates, greater knee flexion and ankle inversion at IC. Sagittal ankle moments had a significant task and surface interaction (p = .006), but no joint moment surface effects were observed. These indicated that FLIP and VERT tasks are significantly different due to angular components. The larger forces and joint stress observed in flipping places individuals at greater risk for ankle injuries. Flipping on a harder surface also introduced higher risks. The theory that landing on harder surfaces increases injury risk is supported. These results also caution individuals when generalizing vertical landings to acrobatic populations.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biomechanics. $3 548685
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Physical education. $3 635343
653 $a Cheerleading
653 $a Flip
653 $a Landing
653 $a Mechanics
653 $a Surface
653 $a Vertical
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0648
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0523
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. $b Kinesiology. $3 2102596
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-05.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29328013 $z click for full text (PQDT)