語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market./
作者:
Chen, Yen Mu.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (383 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International84-07A.
標題:
Science education. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29399182click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798368427485
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market.
Chen, Yen Mu.
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market.
- 1 online resource (383 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
Thesis (D.Sc.)--Temple University, 2022.
Includes bibliographical references
Since I came to Chinese mainland from Taiwan region for Investment in 1995, I found out different corporate behaviors between Chinese mainland-based and Taiwan-based enterprises in China's domestic market. As a result, they may show different enterprise performance, which arouses my great research motivation. Through the analysis of the changes in global political, economic and financial environment, we compare the Chinese mainland-based enterprises and Taiwan-based enterprises in China's domestic market, and find out the organizational differences between these two kinds of enterprises. These enterprises adopt different "competitive strategy" and "portfolio" based on their understanding of the exogenous variables, i.e., "external environment changes" and "international resource strengths" to maximize their "enterprise performance". Mediator-based competitive strategies include cost position strategy, differentiation position strategy, resource leverage strategy and opportunity strategy; portfolio covers vertical-horizontal integration, equity ratio of direct investment, and number of direct investment projects; outcome variable-based enterprise performance includes profit rate, return on shareholders' equity (ROE) and sales growth rate. Based on the corporate strategy, we distributed 60-question questionnaires to 14 industrial categories, 19 sample sub-groups, and collected 1,076 individuals of the sample, with a collection ratio of 32.75%, for 3,285 corporations by both paper and electronic, through a third party, of which 1,038 are valid, accounting for 96.47%. Among them, 445 were collected from Taiwan-based enterprises, accounting for 42.9%, and 593 were collected from Chinese mainland-based enterprises, accounting for 57.1%. Our analysis tool is SPSS, and analysis methods include descriptive statistical analysis, construct validity analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis and cluster analysis.We set up 8 hypotheses and 56 sub-hypotheses, and draw the following conclusions through empirical analysis: H1: Changes in the external environment of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's competitive strategy →Are supported. H2: The internal advantages of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's competitive strategy →Are supported. H3: Changes in the external environment of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's portfolio strategy → Are supported partially. H4: The internal advantages of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's portfolio strategy →Are supported.H5: The competitive strategy of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H6: The portfolio strategy of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H7: The essence of an enterprise will affect the relationship between its competitive strategy and enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H8: The essence of an enterprise will affect the relationship between its portfolio strategy and enterprise performance →Are supported partially.Through cluster analysis, we find that different enterprises have different competitive strategies and portfolio strategies. Cluster analysis can not only explain the differences among different groups, but also identify different business synergies corresponding to different strategic choices of enterprises. Based on the results of Enterprise Performance assessment, we name business synergies according to the business form of each type of enterprise, so as to provide guidance and reference for other enterprises. This research develop a competitive strategy and portfolio fitting model, so call Yen Mu Chen Integrated Strategy Matrix Model ( YMC Model ).It is found that in the YMC Model, the 3x3 matrix can produce 9 strategies, which can be divided into three groups " 2 3 4 Integrated Strategy Groups " according to their differences in profit rate, ROE and sales growth rate: 1.Low Enterprise Performance Group:Type 1: Resources Foundation TypeType 4: Steadily Root-Planting Type2.Moderate Enterprise Performance Group:Type 2: Concentrated Advantage TypeType 5: Profitability Upgrade TypeType 7: Resources Advancing Type3.High Enterprise Performance Group:Type 3: Aggressively-Jump Challenging TypeType 6: Boundary Spanning TypeType 8: Stable Promoting TypeType 9: Industry Leading TypeThe Industry Leading Type will present the best performance in YMC Model. It is suggested that enterprises can maintain their strategic advantages to hold the leading position. We suggest enterprises to evaluate their own resource advantages, find out their competitive advantages and choose their portfolio strategies according to the external environment and their own position, and build the best decision-making model. Finally, theoretical and practical implications are provided for Chinese mainland-based and Taiwan-based enterprises in YMC Model.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798368427485Subjects--Topical Terms:
521340
Science education.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Chinese mainland-basedIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market.
LDR
:06437nmm a2200397K 4500
001
2356647
005
20230619073426.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798368427485
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29399182
035
$a
AAI29399182
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Chen, Yen Mu.
$3
3697142
245
1 4
$a
The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Portfolio Theory on Enterprise Performance ─ A Comparative Study of Chinese Mainland-Based and Taiwan-Based Companies in China's Domestic Market.
264
0
$c
2022
300
$a
1 online resource (383 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Bakshi, Gurdip.
502
$a
Thesis (D.Sc.)--Temple University, 2022.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Since I came to Chinese mainland from Taiwan region for Investment in 1995, I found out different corporate behaviors between Chinese mainland-based and Taiwan-based enterprises in China's domestic market. As a result, they may show different enterprise performance, which arouses my great research motivation. Through the analysis of the changes in global political, economic and financial environment, we compare the Chinese mainland-based enterprises and Taiwan-based enterprises in China's domestic market, and find out the organizational differences between these two kinds of enterprises. These enterprises adopt different "competitive strategy" and "portfolio" based on their understanding of the exogenous variables, i.e., "external environment changes" and "international resource strengths" to maximize their "enterprise performance". Mediator-based competitive strategies include cost position strategy, differentiation position strategy, resource leverage strategy and opportunity strategy; portfolio covers vertical-horizontal integration, equity ratio of direct investment, and number of direct investment projects; outcome variable-based enterprise performance includes profit rate, return on shareholders' equity (ROE) and sales growth rate. Based on the corporate strategy, we distributed 60-question questionnaires to 14 industrial categories, 19 sample sub-groups, and collected 1,076 individuals of the sample, with a collection ratio of 32.75%, for 3,285 corporations by both paper and electronic, through a third party, of which 1,038 are valid, accounting for 96.47%. Among them, 445 were collected from Taiwan-based enterprises, accounting for 42.9%, and 593 were collected from Chinese mainland-based enterprises, accounting for 57.1%. Our analysis tool is SPSS, and analysis methods include descriptive statistical analysis, construct validity analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis and cluster analysis.We set up 8 hypotheses and 56 sub-hypotheses, and draw the following conclusions through empirical analysis: H1: Changes in the external environment of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's competitive strategy →Are supported. H2: The internal advantages of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's competitive strategy →Are supported. H3: Changes in the external environment of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's portfolio strategy → Are supported partially. H4: The internal advantages of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's portfolio strategy →Are supported.H5: The competitive strategy of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H6: The portfolio strategy of an enterprise will affect the enterprise's enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H7: The essence of an enterprise will affect the relationship between its competitive strategy and enterprise performance → Are supported partially.H8: The essence of an enterprise will affect the relationship between its portfolio strategy and enterprise performance →Are supported partially.Through cluster analysis, we find that different enterprises have different competitive strategies and portfolio strategies. Cluster analysis can not only explain the differences among different groups, but also identify different business synergies corresponding to different strategic choices of enterprises. Based on the results of Enterprise Performance assessment, we name business synergies according to the business form of each type of enterprise, so as to provide guidance and reference for other enterprises. This research develop a competitive strategy and portfolio fitting model, so call Yen Mu Chen Integrated Strategy Matrix Model ( YMC Model ).It is found that in the YMC Model, the 3x3 matrix can produce 9 strategies, which can be divided into three groups " 2 3 4 Integrated Strategy Groups " according to their differences in profit rate, ROE and sales growth rate: 1.Low Enterprise Performance Group:Type 1: Resources Foundation TypeType 4: Steadily Root-Planting Type2.Moderate Enterprise Performance Group:Type 2: Concentrated Advantage TypeType 5: Profitability Upgrade TypeType 7: Resources Advancing Type3.High Enterprise Performance Group:Type 3: Aggressively-Jump Challenging TypeType 6: Boundary Spanning TypeType 8: Stable Promoting TypeType 9: Industry Leading TypeThe Industry Leading Type will present the best performance in YMC Model. It is suggested that enterprises can maintain their strategic advantages to hold the leading position. We suggest enterprises to evaluate their own resource advantages, find out their competitive advantages and choose their portfolio strategies according to the external environment and their own position, and build the best decision-making model. Finally, theoretical and practical implications are provided for Chinese mainland-based and Taiwan-based enterprises in YMC Model.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Science education.
$3
521340
650
4
$a
Finance.
$3
542899
650
4
$a
Southeast Asian studies.
$3
3344898
653
$a
Chinese mainland-based
653
$a
Taiwan-based
653
$a
China's domestic market
653
$a
Portfolio theory
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0714
690
$a
0222
690
$a
0338
690
$a
0508
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
Temple University.
$b
Business Administration/Finance.
$3
1672897
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
84-07A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29399182
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9479003
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入