東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment./
作者:	Choi, Sunghee.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (108 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02B.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29213759click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798841779650

Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment.
Choi, Sunghee.

Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment. - 1 online resource (108 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Traditionally, most autism assessment instruments are based on medical models and designed to identify social communication deficits and behavioral abnormality in an individual. However, as more autistic narratives reveal the insider views of autists, some scholars and autistic activists support the neurodiversity model and assert the acceptance of autism as difference and diversity instead of deficits or impairment. With this conceptual shift, it is appropriate to rethink the validity of current autism assessment practice. Adopting contemporary validity theories, which emphasizes the ontological definition of an attribute, response process, and ethical consequences of measurement, this study examined how autism has been defined, how the definitions of autism affect the way autism is understood and assessed, and how autism assessment affects the way people define autism. Also, as a case study, the current form of Social Communication Question was revalidated following Wilson's (2004) Four Building Block approach. The interview conducted with autistic adults and autistic people's caregiver to examine the response process revealed how these people interpret the items in SCQ and how autism assessment tools like SCQ have affected the way they conceptualize autism and establish their self-identities.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798841779650Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AutismIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment.
LDR:02674nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2355916
005 20230530061506.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798841779650
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29213759
035 $a AAI29213759
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Choi, Sunghee. $3 1912941
245 1 0 $a Rethinking the Validity of Autism Assessment.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (108 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Arya, Diana ; Maul, Andrew.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Traditionally, most autism assessment instruments are based on medical models and designed to identify social communication deficits and behavioral abnormality in an individual. However, as more autistic narratives reveal the insider views of autists, some scholars and autistic activists support the neurodiversity model and assert the acceptance of autism as difference and diversity instead of deficits or impairment. With this conceptual shift, it is appropriate to rethink the validity of current autism assessment practice. Adopting contemporary validity theories, which emphasizes the ontological definition of an attribute, response process, and ethical consequences of measurement, this study examined how autism has been defined, how the definitions of autism affect the way autism is understood and assessed, and how autism assessment affects the way people define autism. Also, as a case study, the current form of Social Communication Question was revalidated following Wilson's (2004) Four Building Block approach. The interview conducted with autistic adults and autistic people's caregiver to examine the response process revealed how these people interpret the items in SCQ and how autism assessment tools like SCQ have affected the way they conceptualize autism and establish their self-identities.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
653 $a Autism
653 $a Autism assessment
653 $a Validation
653 $a Validity
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0443
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $b Education. $3 1024457
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29213759 $z click for full text (PQDT)