東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump : = A Systematic Review.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump :/
其他題名:	A Systematic Review.
作者:	Recinto, David.
其他作者:	Cheng, Frank,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (56 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-05B.
標題:	Physical therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992149click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798357577733

A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump : = A Systematic Review.
Recinto, David.

A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump :A Systematic Review. - 1 online resource (56 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.T.)--Azusa Pacific University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Background. The researchers were interested in finding the most effective method to improve vertical jump height. Eccentric and plyometric training were compared in a systematic review (SR) to see their effects on vertical jump height. A critically appraised topic (CAT) was also performed to see the effects that vibration training has on this outcome as well. Methods. Four researchers conducted an SR and a CAT comparing the effectiveness of different training programs and interventions on vertical jump performance. For the SR and CAT, the researchers screened six databases (PubMed, Cochrane, PEDro, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus), and 1,224 articles were initially gathered from January 2022 to March 2022. The inclusion criteria for the SR and CAT included participants who were all healthy, without any current injuries. The exclusion criteria consisted of 1) outcomes based on orthopedic pathologies, 2) modalities used as the interventions, 3) the training program that did not fit eccentric or plyometric definitions, 4) jump height was not recorded, and 5) articles that were set up as a protocol. The exclusion criteria for the CAT were articles that mentioned dynamic stretching, foam rolling, foam, blood flow restriction, COPD, cancer, bone values, compression garment, ACL, injury, and roundhouse kick or were published before 2018. Researchers used the PEDro and National Institute of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH-NHLBI) to assess quality of appraisals and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence to determine the level of evidence. Results. After the exclusion criteria, five articles were left that were appraised for the SR: four randomized controlled trials, one non-randomized controlled trial. The SR contained three articles that showed significant improvements for the group performing eccentric5 focused programs compared to plyometric-focused programs in improving vertical jump height. For the CAT, there were also five articles left after the exclusion criteria that included a mixture of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. In the end, the CAT had two articles that showed significant improvements in vibration training in order to improve vertical jump performance. Conclusion. For the SR and the CAT, there was a lack of research that provided sufficient evidence that conclusively supported the effectiveness of one treatment strategy over another.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798357577733Subjects--Topical Terms:

588713
Physical therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

EccentricIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump : = A Systematic Review.
LDR:03890nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2355810
005 20230523083439.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798357577733
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29992149
035 $a AAI29992149
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Recinto, David. $3 3696261
245 1 2 $a A Comparison between Plyometric and Eccentric Training Protocols on Increasing Vertical Jump : $b A Systematic Review.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (56 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Humphrey, Amy.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.T.)--Azusa Pacific University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Background. The researchers were interested in finding the most effective method to improve vertical jump height. Eccentric and plyometric training were compared in a systematic review (SR) to see their effects on vertical jump height. A critically appraised topic (CAT) was also performed to see the effects that vibration training has on this outcome as well. Methods. Four researchers conducted an SR and a CAT comparing the effectiveness of different training programs and interventions on vertical jump performance. For the SR and CAT, the researchers screened six databases (PubMed, Cochrane, PEDro, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus), and 1,224 articles were initially gathered from January 2022 to March 2022. The inclusion criteria for the SR and CAT included participants who were all healthy, without any current injuries. The exclusion criteria consisted of 1) outcomes based on orthopedic pathologies, 2) modalities used as the interventions, 3) the training program that did not fit eccentric or plyometric definitions, 4) jump height was not recorded, and 5) articles that were set up as a protocol. The exclusion criteria for the CAT were articles that mentioned dynamic stretching, foam rolling, foam, blood flow restriction, COPD, cancer, bone values, compression garment, ACL, injury, and roundhouse kick or were published before 2018. Researchers used the PEDro and National Institute of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH-NHLBI) to assess quality of appraisals and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence to determine the level of evidence. Results. After the exclusion criteria, five articles were left that were appraised for the SR: four randomized controlled trials, one non-randomized controlled trial. The SR contained three articles that showed significant improvements for the group performing eccentric5 focused programs compared to plyometric-focused programs in improving vertical jump height. For the CAT, there were also five articles left after the exclusion criteria that included a mixture of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. In the end, the CAT had two articles that showed significant improvements in vibration training in order to improve vertical jump performance. Conclusion. For the SR and the CAT, there was a lack of research that provided sufficient evidence that conclusively supported the effectiveness of one treatment strategy over another.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
650 4 $a Sports management. $3 3423935
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
653 $a Eccentric
653 $a Jump height
653 $a Plyometric
653 $a Vertical jump height
653 $a Vertical jump performance
653 $a Vibration training
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0430
690 $a 0575
700 1 $a Cheng, Frank, $e author. $3 3696262
700 1 $a Kim, David Chani, $e author. $3 3696263
700 1 $a Poolpuong, Nevin, $e author. $3 3696264
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Azusa Pacific University. $b Physical Therapy. $3 3286106
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-05B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29992149 $z click for full text (PQDT)