語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Generosity as Generality : = The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Generosity as Generality :/
其他題名:
The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature.
作者:
Cho, Seung.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (304 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:
English literature. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29319215click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798845421388
Generosity as Generality : = The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature.
Cho, Seung.
Generosity as Generality :
The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature. - 1 online resource (304 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Rochester, 2022.
Includes bibliographical references
This dissertation studies the Renaissance poetics of largeness by close reading Thomas Browne, John Donne, and William Shakespeare. It aims to demonstrate these writers' literary investment in the power of generosity and their intellectual commitment to articulating generality out of various ideas, values, and perspectives in competition with each other. The notion of largeness of mind is importantly associated with that of copia-abundance, surplus, and fullness-which, in the Erasmian context, refers to rhetorical resourcefulness and enthusiasm for variety and newness. Largeness of mind, in the context of copia, suggests the affluence and fertility of mind, which extends the meaning of largeness to largesse, indicating the attitude of charity, open-mindedness, and munificence. The dissertation sheds light on these writers' literary expression of largeness of mind by investigating their peculiar engagement with early modern skepticism. By practicing skepticism's systematic doubting, characterized by nescience (assumed ignorance), epoche (suspension of judgment), and isosothenia (equilibrium of evidence), Browne, Donne, and Shakespeare all endeavored to challenge the prescribed range of what and how one can know as opposed to the dogmatic assertion of the established truth. This intellectual radicalism allowed them to develop a more comprehensive, generous vision of understanding in the face of their time's inordinate assembly of opposing ideas. Each chapter investigates how Browne, Donne, and Shakespeare figure their largeness of mind through their disciplined use of skepticism, uniquely combined with rhetoric (Browne), casuistry (Donne), and negative capability (Shakespeare). Specifically, Chapter 1 and 2 close read Browne's Religio Medici and Donne's "A Nocturnal upon St. Lucy's Day" and "The Canonization." Each chapter illuminates how these two writers negotiate between their skeptical mindset and orthodox faith, thereby shaping a generous sense of wholeness, by which to accommodate their paradoxical desire for both individual freedom and general harmony. Through their sincere but subtly uneasy allegiance to that orthodox faith, the two authors resolved their inevitable confrontation with epistemological weakness in good humor and in a tolerationist spirit. In other words, their vision of wholeness is aligned with their revisionary encounter with the transcendental order. In keeping with their expression of largeness of mind, this encounter is described in this dissertation either as (1) the radical assumption of the mind of Amphibium, the privatized divine mind imbued with immeasurable generosity, tolerance, and harmony (Browne), or as (2) the casuistic/skeptical dedication to reconciling an individual doubting conscience with universal moral principles, which becomes the linchpin of generalizing the diverse and contradictory elements (Donne). As the study of Shakespeare's largeness of mind, Chapter 3 pays attention to Hamlet and explores the poet's heightened attentiveness to one's exposure to epistemological weakness, the common human frailty that he renders distinctively as "general." Shakespeare, without relying on any transcendental guarantee, stands on the more radical side of the skeptical and the tragic. The poet suggests that such a "weakness," when transformed into "strength" via one's earnest skeptical inquiry, can make the individual existence more solid and possibly more copious with its evocation of epistemological modesty. Shakespeare's largeness of mind is linked predominantly with an open-minded acknowledgment of this common human weakness, which can orchestrate the fragmented reality of human life, beset by self-doubt, disjunction, and contradiction, into a life open to one's free and creative participation, echoed by Hamlet's commandment of "Let be." In this regard, the poet powerfully illuminates the abundance of freedom and possibilities hidden beneath the precariousness of individual existence, the generosity to which must be general, and incessant.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798845421388Subjects--Topical Terms:
516356
English literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Early modern literatureIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
Generosity as Generality : = The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature.
LDR
:05522nmm a2200421K 4500
001
2354762
005
20230501063913.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798845421388
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29319215
035
$a
AAI29319215
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Cho, Seung.
$3
3695127
245
1 0
$a
Generosity as Generality :
$b
The Poetics of Largeness in Renaissance Literature.
264
0
$c
2022
300
$a
1 online resource (304 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Gross, Kenneth Dr.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Rochester, 2022.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
This dissertation studies the Renaissance poetics of largeness by close reading Thomas Browne, John Donne, and William Shakespeare. It aims to demonstrate these writers' literary investment in the power of generosity and their intellectual commitment to articulating generality out of various ideas, values, and perspectives in competition with each other. The notion of largeness of mind is importantly associated with that of copia-abundance, surplus, and fullness-which, in the Erasmian context, refers to rhetorical resourcefulness and enthusiasm for variety and newness. Largeness of mind, in the context of copia, suggests the affluence and fertility of mind, which extends the meaning of largeness to largesse, indicating the attitude of charity, open-mindedness, and munificence. The dissertation sheds light on these writers' literary expression of largeness of mind by investigating their peculiar engagement with early modern skepticism. By practicing skepticism's systematic doubting, characterized by nescience (assumed ignorance), epoche (suspension of judgment), and isosothenia (equilibrium of evidence), Browne, Donne, and Shakespeare all endeavored to challenge the prescribed range of what and how one can know as opposed to the dogmatic assertion of the established truth. This intellectual radicalism allowed them to develop a more comprehensive, generous vision of understanding in the face of their time's inordinate assembly of opposing ideas. Each chapter investigates how Browne, Donne, and Shakespeare figure their largeness of mind through their disciplined use of skepticism, uniquely combined with rhetoric (Browne), casuistry (Donne), and negative capability (Shakespeare). Specifically, Chapter 1 and 2 close read Browne's Religio Medici and Donne's "A Nocturnal upon St. Lucy's Day" and "The Canonization." Each chapter illuminates how these two writers negotiate between their skeptical mindset and orthodox faith, thereby shaping a generous sense of wholeness, by which to accommodate their paradoxical desire for both individual freedom and general harmony. Through their sincere but subtly uneasy allegiance to that orthodox faith, the two authors resolved their inevitable confrontation with epistemological weakness in good humor and in a tolerationist spirit. In other words, their vision of wholeness is aligned with their revisionary encounter with the transcendental order. In keeping with their expression of largeness of mind, this encounter is described in this dissertation either as (1) the radical assumption of the mind of Amphibium, the privatized divine mind imbued with immeasurable generosity, tolerance, and harmony (Browne), or as (2) the casuistic/skeptical dedication to reconciling an individual doubting conscience with universal moral principles, which becomes the linchpin of generalizing the diverse and contradictory elements (Donne). As the study of Shakespeare's largeness of mind, Chapter 3 pays attention to Hamlet and explores the poet's heightened attentiveness to one's exposure to epistemological weakness, the common human frailty that he renders distinctively as "general." Shakespeare, without relying on any transcendental guarantee, stands on the more radical side of the skeptical and the tragic. The poet suggests that such a "weakness," when transformed into "strength" via one's earnest skeptical inquiry, can make the individual existence more solid and possibly more copious with its evocation of epistemological modesty. Shakespeare's largeness of mind is linked predominantly with an open-minded acknowledgment of this common human weakness, which can orchestrate the fragmented reality of human life, beset by self-doubt, disjunction, and contradiction, into a life open to one's free and creative participation, echoed by Hamlet's commandment of "Let be." In this regard, the poet powerfully illuminates the abundance of freedom and possibilities hidden beneath the precariousness of individual existence, the generosity to which must be general, and incessant.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2023
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
English literature.
$3
516356
650
4
$a
British & Irish literature.
$3
3284317
650
4
$a
Literature.
$3
537498
653
$a
Early modern literature
653
$a
Donne, John
653
$a
Largeness of mind
653
$a
Skepticism
653
$a
Browne, Thomas
653
$a
Shakespeare, William
653
$a
Renaissance poetics
653
$a
Writers' literary expressions
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
690
$a
0593
690
$a
0401
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
783688
710
2
$a
University of Rochester.
$b
School of Arts and Sciences.
$3
2099014
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
84-02A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29319215
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9477118
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入