東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Writing in Film Studies : = Poetics and Pedagogy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Writing in Film Studies :/
其他題名:	Poetics and Pedagogy.
作者:	Mead, Bryan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (192 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04A.
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29254196click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798845413154

Writing in Film Studies : = Poetics and Pedagogy.
Mead, Bryan.

Writing in Film Studies :Poetics and Pedagogy. - 1 online resource (192 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Illinois University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The focus of this dissertation is writing instruction inside undergraduate film courses. While the existence of textbooks devoted to teaching students how to write about film highlights the need for such instruction, evidence suggests many courses underuse or neglect such texts. Instead, most instructors focus their efforts on content instruction, expecting students to translate an increased content knowledge into written argumentation. Yet, as is the case across the disciplines, students struggle to write successfully in these disciplinary courses. One of the main reasons for this disparity between instructor expectation and student success is the notion of disciplinarity, and how influential disciplinarity is in the construction, and grading, of assignments at what many consider the entry point into the field. This study identifies disciplinary conventions of the film studies genre system and connects them to the many genres and genre sets in use by professors and students to show how much the discipline dictates what counts as successful writing, even at the introductory, undergraduate level. The study uses the activity system concept to gather and analyze how course syllabi, assignment prompts, student outcomes statements, course textbooks, and professional writing interconnect to form and perpetuate disciplinary norms of writing and argumentation. Identifying these disciplinary norms of argumentation lead to the conclusion that more explicit acknowledgment of these norms can lead to better teaching of, and with, writing in the undergraduate film classroom. The goal of this study is to help instructors identify the conventions implicitly privileged in our classrooms so we can make them more explicit, thereby helping students come up with better arguments and write better papers.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798845413154Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.
Subjects--Index Terms:

FilmIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Writing in Film Studies : = Poetics and Pedagogy.
LDR:03114nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2354610
005 20230428105628.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798845413154
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29254196
035 $a AAI29254196
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Mead, Bryan. $3 3694965
245 1 0 $a Writing in Film Studies : $b Poetics and Pedagogy.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (192 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Peters, Bradley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Illinois University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The focus of this dissertation is writing instruction inside undergraduate film courses. While the existence of textbooks devoted to teaching students how to write about film highlights the need for such instruction, evidence suggests many courses underuse or neglect such texts. Instead, most instructors focus their efforts on content instruction, expecting students to translate an increased content knowledge into written argumentation. Yet, as is the case across the disciplines, students struggle to write successfully in these disciplinary courses. One of the main reasons for this disparity between instructor expectation and student success is the notion of disciplinarity, and how influential disciplinarity is in the construction, and grading, of assignments at what many consider the entry point into the field. This study identifies disciplinary conventions of the film studies genre system and connects them to the many genres and genre sets in use by professors and students to show how much the discipline dictates what counts as successful writing, even at the introductory, undergraduate level. The study uses the activity system concept to gather and analyze how course syllabi, assignment prompts, student outcomes statements, course textbooks, and professional writing interconnect to form and perpetuate disciplinary norms of writing and argumentation. Identifying these disciplinary norms of argumentation lead to the conclusion that more explicit acknowledgment of these norms can lead to better teaching of, and with, writing in the undergraduate film classroom. The goal of this study is to help instructors identify the conventions implicitly privileged in our classrooms so we can make them more explicit, thereby helping students come up with better arguments and write better papers.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
653 $a Film
653 $a Teaching
653 $a Topoi
653 $a writing
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Northern Illinois University. $b English. $3 1682206
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29254196 $z click for full text (PQDT)