東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology./
作者:	Burr, Kevin B.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (280 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03A.
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27955198click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798664725636

Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology.
Burr, Kevin B.

Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology. - 1 online resource (280 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.B.S.)--Asbury Theological Seminary, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

Historical Jesus scholars have long used the criteria of multiple attestation, coherence, dissimilarity, and embarrassment to evaluate the historical probability of Gospel traditions, claiming but rarely demonstrating the coherence of these methods with the methods of general historians (i.e. those outside biblical studies). In the last two decades of Jesus research these criteria have come under increasingly vociferous attacks due to their association with form criticism and its (apparently) problematic tradition model, with some scholars now assuming the demise of the criteria-based approach. Following a detailed survey of historical Jesus scholars' views on the criteria, a review of the historical methods of general historians reveals that these historians consistently speak of authenticity criteria essentially similar to multiple attestation, coherence, dissimilarity, and embarrassment. The comparison of how certain historical Jesus scholars (representing three distinct perspectives on the criteria) apply the criteria on Jesus's trial(s) before his crucifixion and how modern historians of Greco-Roman antiquity apply essentially similar methods on Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon demonstrates that these methods are inherent to the discipline of historiography. The criteria of authenticity are, therefore, neither unique to NT studies nor are they vestiges of bygone historical-positivism but are an essential component of modern historical method.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798664725636Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Criteria of AuthenticityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology.
LDR:02827nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2353845
005 20230322053918.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798664725636
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27955198
035 $a AAI27955198
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Burr, Kevin B. $3 3694177
245 1 0 $a Incomparable? Authenticating Criteria in Historical Jesus Scholarship and General Historical Methodology.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (280 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Keener, Craig S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.B.S.)--Asbury Theological Seminary, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Historical Jesus scholars have long used the criteria of multiple attestation, coherence, dissimilarity, and embarrassment to evaluate the historical probability of Gospel traditions, claiming but rarely demonstrating the coherence of these methods with the methods of general historians (i.e. those outside biblical studies). In the last two decades of Jesus research these criteria have come under increasingly vociferous attacks due to their association with form criticism and its (apparently) problematic tradition model, with some scholars now assuming the demise of the criteria-based approach. Following a detailed survey of historical Jesus scholars' views on the criteria, a review of the historical methods of general historians reveals that these historians consistently speak of authenticity criteria essentially similar to multiple attestation, coherence, dissimilarity, and embarrassment. The comparison of how certain historical Jesus scholars (representing three distinct perspectives on the criteria) apply the criteria on Jesus's trial(s) before his crucifixion and how modern historians of Greco-Roman antiquity apply essentially similar methods on Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon demonstrates that these methods are inherent to the discipline of historiography. The criteria of authenticity are, therefore, neither unique to NT studies nor are they vestiges of bygone historical-positivism but are an essential component of modern historical method.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a Ancient history. $3 2144815
650 4 $a Religious history. $3 2122824
653 $a Criteria of Authenticity
653 $a Historical Jesus
653 $a Historical Method
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0579
690 $a 0320
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Asbury Theological Seminary. $b Advanced Research Programs. $3 3278574
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27955198 $z click for full text (PQDT)