東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research : = Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research :/
其他題名:	Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative.
作者:	Peters, John J.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (299 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-06A.
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978871click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438706415

Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research : = Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative.
Peters, John J.

Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research :Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative. - 1 online resource (299 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

The decline of the form critical approach to the Gospels has caused a reassessment of historiography in New Testament scholarship; this reassessment necessarily involves analyzing the earliest Christian accounts within the broader context of ancient historiography, which includes biography as a subgenre. In dialogue with the primary and secondary literature of ancient historiography, I argue that taking Luke's status as an ancient historian seriously requires taking seriously the values and practices of the ancient historians and assessing him according to those values and practices. This requires assessing Luke on his own terms, which begins above all with recognizing that he represented himself as a historian of contemporary events. Consequently, the dissertation focuses on ancient historians who reported about recent events and analyzes them with respect to the epistemology, conventions, and expectations that governed the research, writing and publication of contemporary historical accounts. The ancient examples surveyed diachronically include the founders of history writing, Herodotus and Thucydides, as well as their distant successors, Polybius and Josephus. These authors represent the best analogs for understanding Luke as a historian because they all wrote primarily about contemporary events and explicitly endorsed eyewitness testimony as the ideal source for knowledge about the past. The research, thus, establishes the proper ancient framework for understanding the values and practices that governed contemporary history writing and situates Luke within that framework. A large portion of this dissertation is devoted particularly to identifying and analyzing the source and method claims of ancient historians as these claims are central to a proper understanding of ancient historiography. Following the model of Thucydides, historians' source and method claims most often occur in the prefaces to their accounts. My analysis demonstrates not only that Luke emulates this historical convention but also that his preface was designed to function as the key to his narrative. In the end, two of the more significant results of the research are that Luke represented himself as a historian of contemporary events and that the opening preface governs the proper understanding of the sources and methodology Luke employed when researching, writing, and publishing his two-volume history.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438706415Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Ancient historyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research : = Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative.
LDR:03912nmm a2200433K 4500 001 2353834
005 20230322053915.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438706415
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10978871
035 $a (MiAaPQ)regent:10850
035 $a AAI10978871
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Peters, John J. $3 3694167
245 1 0 $a Ancient Historiography and Jesus Research : $b Reassessing Luke's Preface and His Historical Narrative.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (299 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Wright, Archibald T.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The decline of the form critical approach to the Gospels has caused a reassessment of historiography in New Testament scholarship; this reassessment necessarily involves analyzing the earliest Christian accounts within the broader context of ancient historiography, which includes biography as a subgenre. In dialogue with the primary and secondary literature of ancient historiography, I argue that taking Luke's status as an ancient historian seriously requires taking seriously the values and practices of the ancient historians and assessing him according to those values and practices. This requires assessing Luke on his own terms, which begins above all with recognizing that he represented himself as a historian of contemporary events. Consequently, the dissertation focuses on ancient historians who reported about recent events and analyzes them with respect to the epistemology, conventions, and expectations that governed the research, writing and publication of contemporary historical accounts. The ancient examples surveyed diachronically include the founders of history writing, Herodotus and Thucydides, as well as their distant successors, Polybius and Josephus. These authors represent the best analogs for understanding Luke as a historian because they all wrote primarily about contemporary events and explicitly endorsed eyewitness testimony as the ideal source for knowledge about the past. The research, thus, establishes the proper ancient framework for understanding the values and practices that governed contemporary history writing and situates Luke within that framework. A large portion of this dissertation is devoted particularly to identifying and analyzing the source and method claims of ancient historians as these claims are central to a proper understanding of ancient historiography. Following the model of Thucydides, historians' source and method claims most often occur in the prefaces to their accounts. My analysis demonstrates not only that Luke emulates this historical convention but also that his preface was designed to function as the key to his narrative. In the end, two of the more significant results of the research are that Luke represented himself as a historian of contemporary events and that the opening preface governs the proper understanding of the sources and methodology Luke employed when researching, writing, and publishing his two-volume history.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a Ancient history. $3 2144815
650 4 $a Classical studies. $3 2122826
653 $a Ancient history
653 $a Eyewitness
653 $a Gospel
653 $a Jesus research
653 $a Luke's preface
653 $a Luke-Acts
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0434
690 $a 0579
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Regent University. $b Divinity. $3 3193981
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-06A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978871 $z click for full text (PQDT)