東華大學圖書館 |

The Ecological Imagination : = Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Ecological Imagination :/
其他題名:	Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today.
作者:	Hosek, Melissa Anne.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (307 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04A.
標題:	Novels. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29342276click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352605967

The Ecological Imagination : = Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today.
Hosek, Melissa Anne.

The Ecological Imagination :Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today. - 1 online resource (307 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines the representations of ecology and science in modern Chinese literature and film. My objective is to understand how modern Chinese eco-perspectives influence and are conditioned by ideas about science and technology. I analyze science fiction (and other science-oriented) novels, short stories, and films using a range of multidisciplinary methodologies. I argue that ideas about ecology are deeply entangled with ideas about scientific progress, but in recent years they have become a vehicle for critiquing modern technoscientific development. Altogether, this study sheds new light on a variety of ecological perspectives from modern Chinese narratives. It also contributes a new perspective to the broader humanistic study of technology and ecology.This dissertation introduces the term "the ecological imagination, " which refers to the representation of one's surroundings including its human and nonhuman composition, as well as the range of material, social, and personal interactions fostered within this space. The ecological imagination is a flexible lens of analysis focused on the holistic interpretation of what ecology is envisioned to become, and what it means to and with humanity. In contrast to scholarship centered on clearly identifiable environmental genres such as "nature writing" and "climate fiction, " I read for the perceived human-nature relationship in narratives as communicated through the oft-overlooked descriptions of material interactions. In this way, I posit that even highly technological futures can be read as eco-futures.My work draws upon scholarship from a wide array of cultures and historical contexts grounded in the criticism of technology. Looking to complicate Heidegger's notion that technology "enframes" ideas about nature, I examine how ideas about technology and ideas about ecology co-produce each other. I draw upon a variety of sources that identify imagination and fantastic dreams as the catalyst of scientific and technological development to posit that this co-production occurs during the ideation stage of technological progress. If ecocritic Lawrence Buell was correct in arguing that changing human actions on and with the environment requires first a change in our culture, then I posit that it is at the intersection of ecological imagination and technological imagination that this potential change occurs and must be studied.This is the first extensive study on ecocriticism and Chinese science fiction. I examine and compare works written from the last year of the Mao era through today. Chapter One argues that science-oriented narratives in 1970s China used ecology to aestheticize the ideology of science, but there were two competing scientific epistemes. Chapter Two argues that these epistemes were cobbled together in the immediate post-Mao years when the literary landscape underwent significant changes, laying the groundwork for a new "boom" of science literature in the Deng Xiaoping era. Chapter three argues that literature and film in the Deng era continued to use ecology to aestheticize science, but some used this perspective to critically explore changing ideas about humanity's place in the physical world. Chapter Four argues that contemporary Chinese science fiction transforms ecological representations into a weapon of criticism, channeling public sentiment while also shedding light on problems of urban ecology. Chapter Five examines how the contemporary bestselling science fiction novel The Three Body Problem plays with the prospect of condemning humanity for its ecological harm, but ultimately yearns for humanistic ethical responses to eco-crisis.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352605967Subjects--Topical Terms:

3566249
Novels.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Ecological Imagination : = Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today.
LDR:05037nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2353487
005 20230306113629.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352605967
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29342276
035 $a (MiAaPQ)STANFORDzk881dv5985
035 $a AAI29342276
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hosek, Melissa Anne. $3 3693829
245 1 4 $a The Ecological Imagination : $b Nature, Technology, and Criticism in Chinese Science Fiction, 1976-Today.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (307 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Wang, Ban; Ayala, Hector Hoyos; Zur, Dafna; Lee, Haiyan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines the representations of ecology and science in modern Chinese literature and film. My objective is to understand how modern Chinese eco-perspectives influence and are conditioned by ideas about science and technology. I analyze science fiction (and other science-oriented) novels, short stories, and films using a range of multidisciplinary methodologies. I argue that ideas about ecology are deeply entangled with ideas about scientific progress, but in recent years they have become a vehicle for critiquing modern technoscientific development. Altogether, this study sheds new light on a variety of ecological perspectives from modern Chinese narratives. It also contributes a new perspective to the broader humanistic study of technology and ecology.This dissertation introduces the term "the ecological imagination, " which refers to the representation of one's surroundings including its human and nonhuman composition, as well as the range of material, social, and personal interactions fostered within this space. The ecological imagination is a flexible lens of analysis focused on the holistic interpretation of what ecology is envisioned to become, and what it means to and with humanity. In contrast to scholarship centered on clearly identifiable environmental genres such as "nature writing" and "climate fiction, " I read for the perceived human-nature relationship in narratives as communicated through the oft-overlooked descriptions of material interactions. In this way, I posit that even highly technological futures can be read as eco-futures.My work draws upon scholarship from a wide array of cultures and historical contexts grounded in the criticism of technology. Looking to complicate Heidegger's notion that technology "enframes" ideas about nature, I examine how ideas about technology and ideas about ecology co-produce each other. I draw upon a variety of sources that identify imagination and fantastic dreams as the catalyst of scientific and technological development to posit that this co-production occurs during the ideation stage of technological progress. If ecocritic Lawrence Buell was correct in arguing that changing human actions on and with the environment requires first a change in our culture, then I posit that it is at the intersection of ecological imagination and technological imagination that this potential change occurs and must be studied.This is the first extensive study on ecocriticism and Chinese science fiction. I examine and compare works written from the last year of the Mao era through today. Chapter One argues that science-oriented narratives in 1970s China used ecology to aestheticize the ideology of science, but there were two competing scientific epistemes. Chapter Two argues that these epistemes were cobbled together in the immediate post-Mao years when the literary landscape underwent significant changes, laying the groundwork for a new "boom" of science literature in the Deng Xiaoping era. Chapter three argues that literature and film in the Deng era continued to use ecology to aestheticize science, but some used this perspective to critically explore changing ideas about humanity's place in the physical world. Chapter Four argues that contemporary Chinese science fiction transforms ecological representations into a weapon of criticism, channeling public sentiment while also shedding light on problems of urban ecology. Chapter Five examines how the contemporary bestselling science fiction novel The Three Body Problem plays with the prospect of condemning humanity for its ecological harm, but ultimately yearns for humanistic ethical responses to eco-crisis.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Novels. $3 3566249
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Asian literature. $3 2122707
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 2122736
650 4 $a Science fiction & fantasy. $3 3556852
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0305
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0401
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29342276 $z click for full text (PQDT)