東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Anger Eliminativism : = Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Anger Eliminativism :/
其他題名:	Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives.
作者:	Bingle, Bobby.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (117 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-03A.
標題:	Ethics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29258170click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798351448541

Anger Eliminativism : = Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives.
Bingle, Bobby.

Anger Eliminativism :Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives. - 1 online resource (117 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Many psychologists and philosophers hold that anger is a completely normal and often healthy human emotion. This position perhaps traces back to Aristotle, who argued that anger is morally good when it is moderated, such as towards the right people, to the right degree, and for the right reasons. Even though Aristotle's position has widespread acceptance, this view of anger is challenged by the philosophical traditions of Stoicism and Buddhism. Despite starting from disparate premises, both conclude that anger is impermissible and ought to be eliminated, a position called anger eliminativism. Even so, there has been little critical engagement with their respective arguments as bona fide philosophical positions, worthy of consideration in their own right. This dissertation hopes to help remedy that lack. To do so, it offers a philosophical exploration of Stoic and Buddhist arguments. It contrasts and critically evaluates the views of Stoicism and Buddhism, evaluates the Buddhist metaphysical reasoning about anger, responds to existing interpretations of Stoic anger eliminativism, and presents Stoic objections to arguments from the Confucian tradition that anger is at least sometimes the morally virtuous response to perceived wrongdoing.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798351448541Subjects--Topical Terms:

517264
Ethics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AngerIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Anger Eliminativism : = Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives.
LDR:02533nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2353475
005 20230306113625.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798351448541
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29258170
035 $a AAI29258170
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Bingle, Bobby. $3 3693818
245 1 0 $a Anger Eliminativism : $b Stoic and Buddhist Perspectives.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (117 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Flanagan, Owen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Many psychologists and philosophers hold that anger is a completely normal and often healthy human emotion. This position perhaps traces back to Aristotle, who argued that anger is morally good when it is moderated, such as towards the right people, to the right degree, and for the right reasons. Even though Aristotle's position has widespread acceptance, this view of anger is challenged by the philosophical traditions of Stoicism and Buddhism. Despite starting from disparate premises, both conclude that anger is impermissible and ought to be eliminated, a position called anger eliminativism. Even so, there has been little critical engagement with their respective arguments as bona fide philosophical positions, worthy of consideration in their own right. This dissertation hopes to help remedy that lack. To do so, it offers a philosophical exploration of Stoic and Buddhist arguments. It contrasts and critically evaluates the views of Stoicism and Buddhism, evaluates the Buddhist metaphysical reasoning about anger, responds to existing interpretations of Stoic anger eliminativism, and presents Stoic objections to arguments from the Confucian tradition that anger is at least sometimes the morally virtuous response to perceived wrongdoing.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Classical studies. $3 2122826
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
653 $a Anger
653 $a Buddhism
653 $a Emotions
653 $a Stoicism
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0434
690 $a 0342
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Philosophy. $3 1030134
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-03A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29258170 $z click for full text (PQDT)