東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production./
作者:	Dux Speltz, Emily.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (96 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-01.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27741106click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798641319254

The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production.
Dux Speltz, Emily.

The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production. - 1 online resource (96 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--Iowa State University, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

Fluency is undoubtedly an important aspect of written language production, but little is known about the best ways to encourage the fluent production of text. This article presents a new intervention for improving first language (L1) writing fluency and reports an empirical study investigating writing quality with this intervention. The intervention explicitly encourages fluent text production by providing automated real-time feedback to the writer. The design of this intervention was informed by previous studies on strategy-focused interventions and by two learning theories: skill acquisition theory and the cognitive process theory of writing. Guided by previous research and these theories, this study developed two research questions concerning the new intervention. These questions concerned the impact of this intervention on product and process measures of writing and on users' perceptions of the intervention.To address these research questions, this study employed a mixed-methods approach. It collected quantitative and qualitative data from twenty native-English-speaking undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university. The quantitative data consisted of scores earned by the participants upon completing two writing tasks: one which included the new fluency intervention and one which served as the control condition. These tasks were conducted using an online text editor with embedded keystroke logging capabilities. Linear mixed-effect models were run to analyze the effect of the intervention on the final product of writing (i.e., the text that is produced) and the process of writing (i.e., the time-course of the moment-by-moment actions that taken to produce the text). Findings demonstrated that there were significant differences between the fluency intervention condition and the control condition in terms of the product and the process. Specifically, participants wrote more text, expressed more ideas, and produced a higher-quality text in the fluency intervention condition. The qualitative data consisted of responses to questionnaires in which participants reported their perceptions of the intervention upon completing it. They expressed some potential benefits of the intervention, including being able to think faster and generate more ideas, feeling motivated to write, and writing more intentionally. After presenting these findings in more detail, this thesis concludes by discussing potential practical applications of this intervention.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798641319254Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

FluencyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production.
LDR:03902nmm a2200421K 4500 001 2353244
005 20230306113741.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798641319254
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27741106
035 $a AAI27741106
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dux Speltz, Emily. $3 3693589
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Automated Fluency Feedback on Written Text Production.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (96 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
500 $a Advisor: Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Iowa State University, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Fluency is undoubtedly an important aspect of written language production, but little is known about the best ways to encourage the fluent production of text. This article presents a new intervention for improving first language (L1) writing fluency and reports an empirical study investigating writing quality with this intervention. The intervention explicitly encourages fluent text production by providing automated real-time feedback to the writer. The design of this intervention was informed by previous studies on strategy-focused interventions and by two learning theories: skill acquisition theory and the cognitive process theory of writing. Guided by previous research and these theories, this study developed two research questions concerning the new intervention. These questions concerned the impact of this intervention on product and process measures of writing and on users' perceptions of the intervention.To address these research questions, this study employed a mixed-methods approach. It collected quantitative and qualitative data from twenty native-English-speaking undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university. The quantitative data consisted of scores earned by the participants upon completing two writing tasks: one which included the new fluency intervention and one which served as the control condition. These tasks were conducted using an online text editor with embedded keystroke logging capabilities. Linear mixed-effect models were run to analyze the effect of the intervention on the final product of writing (i.e., the text that is produced) and the process of writing (i.e., the time-course of the moment-by-moment actions that taken to produce the text). Findings demonstrated that there were significant differences between the fluency intervention condition and the control condition in terms of the product and the process. Specifically, participants wrote more text, expressed more ideas, and produced a higher-quality text in the fluency intervention condition. The qualitative data consisted of responses to questionnaires in which participants reported their perceptions of the intervention upon completing it. They expressed some potential benefits of the intervention, including being able to think faster and generate more ideas, feeling motivated to write, and writing more intentionally. After presenting these findings in more detail, this thesis concludes by discussing potential practical applications of this intervention.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
650 4 $a Foreign language learning. $3 3436780
650 4 $a Foreign language instruction. $3 3541319
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
653 $a Fluency
653 $a Keystroke logging
653 $a Strategy-focused intervention
653 $a Writing
653 $a Writing process
653 $a Written language production
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b English. $3 1020984
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27741106 $z click for full text (PQDT)