東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Charge of Command Responsibility : = an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Charge of Command Responsibility :/
其他題名:	an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers.
作者:	Bushell, Peter E.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (188 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-01.
標題:	Modern history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29209087click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798834055983

The Charge of Command Responsibility : = an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers.
Bushell, Peter E.

The Charge of Command Responsibility :an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers. - 1 online resource (188 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Following the Second World War, the Allied Powers conducted a series of ground-breaking war crime trials to seek justice for atrocities committed by Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany. These trials produced the legal doctrine of command responsibility; a principle that addresses a military commander's accountability for the crimes of their troops, even if they did not order or authorize the commission of the crimes. The legacy of how command responsibility was implemented is significant not only for its first problematic precedent but because of the lessons it holds for current international war crime courts.This work examines the first Japanese war crime trials that dealt with command responsibility (that of General Yamashita and Lt. General Homma) and contrasts them with two later but comparable German trials (the High Command and Hostage Cases). While scholarship on Japanese war crimes trials has recently burgeoned in the last decade, no close comparison has ever been made between German and Japanese command responsibility cases. Contrasting differences in the trials' procedures, conviction criteria, and final judgments are vital to achieving a better understanding of the evolution of command responsibility. The present study utilizes trial records, military reports, and war-era accounts to analyze these four trials and examines the possible outcomes of placing the Japanese defendants on trial while applying the conviction criteria used during the German Cases.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798834055983Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122829
Modern history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Command responsibilityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

The Charge of Command Responsibility : = an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers.
LDR:02898nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2353195
005 20221214062820.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798834055983
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29209087
035 $a AAI29209087
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Bushell, Peter E. $3 3693538
245 1 4 $a The Charge of Command Responsibility : $b an Examination of Command Responsibility in the Post-World War Ii War Crime Trials of Axis Powers.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (188 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-01.
500 $a Advisor: Totani, Yuma.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Following the Second World War, the Allied Powers conducted a series of ground-breaking war crime trials to seek justice for atrocities committed by Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany. These trials produced the legal doctrine of command responsibility; a principle that addresses a military commander's accountability for the crimes of their troops, even if they did not order or authorize the commission of the crimes. The legacy of how command responsibility was implemented is significant not only for its first problematic precedent but because of the lessons it holds for current international war crime courts.This work examines the first Japanese war crime trials that dealt with command responsibility (that of General Yamashita and Lt. General Homma) and contrasts them with two later but comparable German trials (the High Command and Hostage Cases). While scholarship on Japanese war crimes trials has recently burgeoned in the last decade, no close comparison has ever been made between German and Japanese command responsibility cases. Contrasting differences in the trials' procedures, conviction criteria, and final judgments are vital to achieving a better understanding of the evolution of command responsibility. The present study utilizes trial records, military reports, and war-era accounts to analyze these four trials and examines the possible outcomes of placing the Japanese defendants on trial while applying the conviction criteria used during the German Cases.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Military history. $3 552332
653 $a Command responsibility
653 $a High command case
653 $a Homma trial
653 $a Hostage case
653 $a Yamashita trial
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0722
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $b History. $3 3278192
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29209087 $z click for full text (PQDT)