東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators./
作者:	Jones, David Robert.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	195 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28712749
ISBN:	9798535532349

Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators.
Jones, David Robert.

Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 195 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

I applied Foucauldian discourse analysis to understand how creativity research discourse excludes racialized, gendered, and disabled creators. The discourse plane consisted of the three most prominent peer-reviewed journals dedicated to the exploration of creativity as a human trait. Within this plane, power manifested across a nexus involving publishers, organizations commissioning the journals, editorial boards, and a handful of prolific actors with various roles. Additionally, the enactment of power reflects capitalist and consumerist values. Those with power, who regulate creativity research discourse, permit the study of elements that comprise or contribute to creativity, what benefits creativity provides, more perfectly measuring creativity, fostering creativity. Speaking is permitted to the degree that it elaborates and/or refines this pattern of discourse. Those permitted to speak are highly credentialed and employed in higher education, most often White and sometimes Asian, male, and most often working in Europe and North America. The discourse plane suggests that potential creators are students and workers, demonstrating that notions of creativity are less often concerned with the human experience of creativity. Instead, creativity entangles with beliefs about who can be productive and how does productivity serve the economy. The analysis revealed hegemonic practices underlying peer-reviewed publication related to creativity research discourse. Initial ideas for curtailing those hegemonic practices include researching beyond classrooms and workplaces. Additionally, constructing a more perfect model of creativity entails recruiting a more diverse population upon which to model the trait.

ISBN: 9798535532349Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Creativity research

Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators.
LDR:03053nmm a2200409 4500 001 2352944
005 20221209093040.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535532349
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28712749
035 $a AAI28712749
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jones, David Robert. $3 3692622
245 1 0 $a Banal Creativity: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Reveal Mechanisms that Exclude Racialized, Gendered, and Disabled Creators.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 195 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Advisor: Hall, K. Melchor Quick.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a I applied Foucauldian discourse analysis to understand how creativity research discourse excludes racialized, gendered, and disabled creators. The discourse plane consisted of the three most prominent peer-reviewed journals dedicated to the exploration of creativity as a human trait. Within this plane, power manifested across a nexus involving publishers, organizations commissioning the journals, editorial boards, and a handful of prolific actors with various roles. Additionally, the enactment of power reflects capitalist and consumerist values. Those with power, who regulate creativity research discourse, permit the study of elements that comprise or contribute to creativity, what benefits creativity provides, more perfectly measuring creativity, fostering creativity. Speaking is permitted to the degree that it elaborates and/or refines this pattern of discourse. Those permitted to speak are highly credentialed and employed in higher education, most often White and sometimes Asian, male, and most often working in Europe and North America. The discourse plane suggests that potential creators are students and workers, demonstrating that notions of creativity are less often concerned with the human experience of creativity. Instead, creativity entangles with beliefs about who can be productive and how does productivity serve the economy. The analysis revealed hegemonic practices underlying peer-reviewed publication related to creativity research discourse. Initial ideas for curtailing those hegemonic practices include researching beyond classrooms and workplaces. Additionally, constructing a more perfect model of creativity entails recruiting a more diverse population upon which to model the trait.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Research. $3 531893
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Dance. $3 610547
650 4 $a Values. $3 518648
650 4 $a Gender. $3 2001319
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Discourse analysis. $3 524995
650 4 $a Social exclusion. $3 3560770
650 4 $a Actors. $3 641271
650 4 $a Disability. $3 3556854
650 4 $a Bias. $2 gtt $3 1374837
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Power. $3 518736
650 4 $a Cloning. $3 571606
650 4 $a Autism. $3 526650
650 4 $a Art. $3 516292
650 4 $a Creativity. $3 605632
650 4 $a Children & youth. $3 3541389
650 4 $a Paradigms. $3 3560141
650 4 $a Literature reviews. $3 3559998
650 4 $a Sex discrimination. $3 536004
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Philosophers. $3 558041
653 $a Creativity research
653 $a Disability
653 $a Foucauldian discourse analysis
653 $a Gender
653 $a Personhood
653 $a Race
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0378
690 $a 0515
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $b School for Leadership Studies. $3 3541473
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 1503
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28712749