東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition./
作者:	Walsh, Apryl Suzanne.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	431 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-09A.
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28965463
ISBN:	9798790650178

Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition.
Walsh, Apryl Suzanne.

Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 431 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore what elementary teachers recommend and understand in identifying appropriate referral and classroom support placement procedures of English language learners with a suspected disability in the southeastern United States. Incorporating the conceptual frameworks of Bandura (1977) and Vygotsky (1986), the study investigated what elementary teachers recommend for identifying appropriate placement for English language learners and what elementary teachers understand in pre-referral and referral procedures before referring English language learners for special education testing for a suspected disability. Data was collected from 12 semi-structured one-on-one interviews and 40 qualitative questionnaire participants. Once the data was manually organized and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis procedure, the use of NVivo software supported further organization. Communication was repeatedly described as the most important and difficult challenge teachers face in determining proper educational placements. Teachers described strategies helpful for determining proper placement before and during pre-referral processes and mentioned interventions such as chunking assignments, translating curriculum, and using wait time. Teachers described their knowledge level in this pre-referral and referral process as lacking in many ways.

ISBN: 9798790650178Subjects--Topical Terms:

516208
English as a second language.
Subjects--Index Terms:

English language learners

Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition.
LDR:02654nmm a2200397 4500 001 2352820
005 20221205085614.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798790650178
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28965463
035 $a AAI28965463
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Walsh, Apryl Suzanne. $3 3692479
245 1 0 $a Distinguishing the Difference Between a Disability and Language Acquisition.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 431 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kelly, Dolores.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore what elementary teachers recommend and understand in identifying appropriate referral and classroom support placement procedures of English language learners with a suspected disability in the southeastern United States. Incorporating the conceptual frameworks of Bandura (1977) and Vygotsky (1986), the study investigated what elementary teachers recommend for identifying appropriate placement for English language learners and what elementary teachers understand in pre-referral and referral procedures before referring English language learners for special education testing for a suspected disability. Data was collected from 12 semi-structured one-on-one interviews and 40 qualitative questionnaire participants. Once the data was manually organized and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis procedure, the use of NVivo software supported further organization. Communication was repeatedly described as the most important and difficult challenge teachers face in determining proper educational placements. Teachers described strategies helpful for determining proper placement before and during pre-referral processes and mentioned interventions such as chunking assignments, translating curriculum, and using wait time. Teachers described their knowledge level in this pre-referral and referral process as lacking in many ways.
590 $a School code: 1582.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a English language learners
653 $a Suspected disability
653 $a Special education
653 $a Proper educational placements
653 $a Disproportionality
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0201
710 2 $a Grand Canyon University. $b College of Doctoral Studies. $3 2097618
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-09A.
790 $a 1582
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28965463