東華大學圖書館 |

The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football./
作者:	Neville, Christopher William.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	77 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-07B.
標題:	Physiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28854768
ISBN:	9798759928546

The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football.
Neville, Christopher William.

The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 77 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.

Thesis (M.Phil.)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Introduction.Training sessions in professional football have typically been designed by technical coaches to achieve pre-determined outcomes. Various activities are combined to form individual training elements and the product of these elements form a training session. Commonly four categories have provided the foundation for team and individual player development (Ade et al., 2016; Buckthorpe et al., 2019). The efficiency in which physical, technical, tactical and psycho-social categories are combined in match play often leads to success. It is therefore prudent for clubs to design training sessions with these factors in mind, both in the short and long term. The level of focus attributed to the four categories during routine training sessions remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative importance of training session composition to training periodisation models in professional football.Methods.A quantitative study design was used to determine the level of focus placed on each of the categories from 72 training session throughout the 2nd half of a Championship (UK) session. An expert panel (1 x coach, 1 x sports scientist, 1 x training analyst) was formed to provide a rated interpretation of the level of focus placed on each category of each element of the full training session. The rated values were combined with the element duration to provide a relative value. The level of overall session focus could then be established relative to matchday (MD). Inter-rater reliability was carried out using a Cohens Kappa.Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was carried out on all training sessions from December to April. The 4 training sessions in May weren't truly representative of a full training month. Analysis was used to determine whether differences existed in total training sessions values between months and between day prior to MD. To determine the difference in months, a one-way ANOVA was carried out and significance set at p=<0.05. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish where the differences were found between months. To establish comparison between categories separate analysis was carried out. Normality of distribution using a Shapiro Wilks test (p=<0.05) was carried out and data found to be not normally distributed (p=.781). Therefore a Kruskal-Wallis non parametric test was used. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish where the differences were found between categories. A one-way ANOVA was also carried out to assess category variation existed between training days and significance set at p=<0.05. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish the differences between training days.Results.The mean total value for all training sessions = 440.4 a.u ± 126 and 62.5% of sessions fell within a single standard deviation of the mean. When viewed across training months, significant difference was observed December and April (p=0.002), December and March (p=0.004) and December and January (p=0.028). Analysis between categories demonstrated a significant difference between physical to technical (p=0.013), physical to tactical (p=<0.001), physical to psycho-social (p=<0.001), technical to tactical (p=<0.001), technical to psych-social (p=<0.001) and tactical to psycho-social (p=<0.001).

ISBN: 9798759928546Subjects--Topical Terms:

518431
Physiology.

The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football.
LDR:04511nmm a2200325 4500 001 2351962
005 20221111113725.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798759928546
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28854768
035 $a (MiAaPQ)LiverpoolJohnMoores15462
035 $a AAI28854768
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Neville, Christopher William. $3 3691565
245 1 4 $a The Relative Importance of Training Session Composition to Training Periodisation Models in Professional Football.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Brownlee, Thomas;Drust, Barry.
502 $a Thesis (M.Phil.)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Introduction.Training sessions in professional football have typically been designed by technical coaches to achieve pre-determined outcomes. Various activities are combined to form individual training elements and the product of these elements form a training session. Commonly four categories have provided the foundation for team and individual player development (Ade et al., 2016; Buckthorpe et al., 2019). The efficiency in which physical, technical, tactical and psycho-social categories are combined in match play often leads to success. It is therefore prudent for clubs to design training sessions with these factors in mind, both in the short and long term. The level of focus attributed to the four categories during routine training sessions remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative importance of training session composition to training periodisation models in professional football.Methods.A quantitative study design was used to determine the level of focus placed on each of the categories from 72 training session throughout the 2nd half of a Championship (UK) session. An expert panel (1 x coach, 1 x sports scientist, 1 x training analyst) was formed to provide a rated interpretation of the level of focus placed on each category of each element of the full training session. The rated values were combined with the element duration to provide a relative value. The level of overall session focus could then be established relative to matchday (MD). Inter-rater reliability was carried out using a Cohens Kappa.Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was carried out on all training sessions from December to April. The 4 training sessions in May weren't truly representative of a full training month. Analysis was used to determine whether differences existed in total training sessions values between months and between day prior to MD. To determine the difference in months, a one-way ANOVA was carried out and significance set at p=<0.05. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish where the differences were found between months. To establish comparison between categories separate analysis was carried out. Normality of distribution using a Shapiro Wilks test (p=<0.05) was carried out and data found to be not normally distributed (p=.781). Therefore a Kruskal-Wallis non parametric test was used. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish where the differences were found between categories. A one-way ANOVA was also carried out to assess category variation existed between training days and significance set at p=<0.05. Where an effect was found a Dunn post hoc test was used (p<0.05) to establish the differences between training days.Results.The mean total value for all training sessions = 440.4 a.u ± 126 and 62.5% of sessions fell within a single standard deviation of the mean. When viewed across training months, significant difference was observed December and April (p=0.002), December and March (p=0.004) and December and January (p=0.028). Analysis between categories demonstrated a significant difference between physical to technical (p=0.013), physical to tactical (p=<0.001), physical to psycho-social (p=<0.001), technical to tactical (p=<0.001), technical to psych-social (p=<0.001) and tactical to psycho-social (p=<0.001).
590 $a School code: 8357.
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Balance. $3 3683607
650 4 $a Metabolism. $3 541349
650 4 $a Soccer. $3 520214
650 4 $a Sports injuries. $3 520144
650 4 $a Heart rate. $3 3563099
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Sports management. $3 3423935
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0430
710 2 $a Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom). $3 3556313
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-07B.
790 $a 8357
791 $a M.Phil.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28854768