東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession./
作者:	Cohen, Gary Wayne, Jr.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	124 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
標題:	Public health. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28651475
ISBN:	9798460433803

The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession.
Cohen, Gary Wayne, Jr.

The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 124 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Clinical reasoning (CR) is defined as a complex multi-factorial metacognitive process for diagnosis formulation. Clinical reasoning begins as a student and develops over a career. Students are typically taught an analytical approach defined as hypothetico-deductive reasoning (HDR). Expert clinicians use a non-analytical approach defined as the Knowledge Based Model (KBM) of CR. It is accepted that clinicians use the KBM with cases that they have more experience to streamline the evaluation process. Unfortunately, because of the nuance of CR there have been limited investigations within athletic training to evaluate CR outside of the student population.The overarching purpose of this dissertation was to investigate CR in athletic training preceptors. To achieve this purpose, three interrelated projects were conducted. The first project involved a systematic review to investigate the use of the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI). The second project assessed clinical reasoning using the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory for Athletic Trainers (DTI-AT) in athletic training preceptors. The second project was guided by the Longitudinal Framework for Fostering Critical Thinking and Diagnostic Reasoning to establish appropriate demographic questions associated with CR development. The final project explored preceptors' perceptions of CR in athletic training. The systematic review confirmed that the DTI was a valid, reliable, and widely used instrument to assess CR in healthcare professions. The instrument was used in medicine, physiotherapy, and athletic training. Project II indicated that the athletic training preceptors studied scored higher on the DTI than the averages of all other professions assessed in the literature, however, all other professions included both students and professionals. Professional sociability was found to be the only demographic factor related to higher scores on the DTI-AT. This finding contrasted with the Longitudinal Framework for Fostering Critical Thinking and Diagnostic Reasoning. Project III identified that CR processes in athletic training are highly variable between individual clinicians based on their experiences, confidence, patients, and external factors. Findings from these three projects indicate the importance of continued CR assessment of athletic training professionals, inclusion of soft skills in athletic training education, and encouraging professional sociability both inter- and intraprofessionally.

ISBN: 9798460433803Subjects--Topical Terms:

534748
Public health.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Athletic training

The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession.
LDR:03766nmm a2200409 4500 001 2351918
005 20221111113713.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798460433803
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28651475
035 $a AAI28651475
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cohen, Gary Wayne, Jr. $0 (orcid)0000-0003-0639-156X $3 3691513
245 1 4 $a The Assessment of Clinical Reasoning in Preceptors across the Athletic Training Profession.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 124 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Van Lunen, Bonnie L.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Clinical reasoning (CR) is defined as a complex multi-factorial metacognitive process for diagnosis formulation. Clinical reasoning begins as a student and develops over a career. Students are typically taught an analytical approach defined as hypothetico-deductive reasoning (HDR). Expert clinicians use a non-analytical approach defined as the Knowledge Based Model (KBM) of CR. It is accepted that clinicians use the KBM with cases that they have more experience to streamline the evaluation process. Unfortunately, because of the nuance of CR there have been limited investigations within athletic training to evaluate CR outside of the student population.The overarching purpose of this dissertation was to investigate CR in athletic training preceptors. To achieve this purpose, three interrelated projects were conducted. The first project involved a systematic review to investigate the use of the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI). The second project assessed clinical reasoning using the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory for Athletic Trainers (DTI-AT) in athletic training preceptors. The second project was guided by the Longitudinal Framework for Fostering Critical Thinking and Diagnostic Reasoning to establish appropriate demographic questions associated with CR development. The final project explored preceptors' perceptions of CR in athletic training. The systematic review confirmed that the DTI was a valid, reliable, and widely used instrument to assess CR in healthcare professions. The instrument was used in medicine, physiotherapy, and athletic training. Project II indicated that the athletic training preceptors studied scored higher on the DTI than the averages of all other professions assessed in the literature, however, all other professions included both students and professionals. Professional sociability was found to be the only demographic factor related to higher scores on the DTI-AT. This finding contrasted with the Longitudinal Framework for Fostering Critical Thinking and Diagnostic Reasoning. Project III identified that CR processes in athletic training are highly variable between individual clinicians based on their experiences, confidence, patients, and external factors. Findings from these three projects indicate the importance of continued CR assessment of athletic training professionals, inclusion of soft skills in athletic training education, and encouraging professional sociability both inter- and intraprofessionally.
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Sports management. $3 3423935
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Athletic training
653 $a Case pattern recognition
653 $a Clinical decision-making
653 $a Clinical reasoning
653 $a Dual process
653 $a Hypothetico-deductive reasoning
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0430
690 $a 0680
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $b Health Sciences. $3 3347754
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04B.
790 $a 0418
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28651475