東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada?/
Author:	Malik, Pankhuri.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
Description:	206 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-11.
Subject:	Inventors. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29239004
ISBN:	9798438767145

Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada?
Malik, Pankhuri.

Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 206 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.

Thesis (LL.M.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

American scholar, Mark Bartholomew, predicted in 2018 that a new kind of neuroscientific evidence would help businesses involved in lawsuits connect their trademarks with the public's perception of their trademarks. Bartholomew coined the term "neuromarks' for this evidence. Bartholomew focused on U.S. trademark law. This research demonstrates, looking at both Canada's domestic law and Canada's relevant international treaties and trade agreements, that such evidence has not yet been used (in 2022) in trademark litigation in Canadian courts or tribunals but that there appears to be no legal barrier to its use in future in Canada. This research notes that neuroscience literature indicates that, while Bartholomew discussed "neuromarks" as a future concept, from the neuroscientific perspective, it is already scientifically possible to obtain evidence of individuals' connections between marks and specific goods and services: it only awaits litigators in Canadian cases introducing such evidence and Bartholomew's "neuromarks" can become a reality.

ISBN: 9798438767145Subjects--Topical Terms:

534219
Inventors.

Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada?
LDR:02134nmm a2200325 4500 001 2351334
005 20221107085354.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798438767145
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29239004
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oaiirlibuwocaetd11161
035 $a AAI29239004
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Malik, Pankhuri. $3 3690897
245 1 0 $a Can Novel Findings from Emerging Neuroscientific Technologies Be Incorporated into Trademark Law in Canada?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 206 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
500 $a Advisor: Wilkinson, Margaret Ann.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a American scholar, Mark Bartholomew, predicted in 2018 that a new kind of neuroscientific evidence would help businesses involved in lawsuits connect their trademarks with the public's perception of their trademarks. Bartholomew coined the term "neuromarks' for this evidence. Bartholomew focused on U.S. trademark law. This research demonstrates, looking at both Canada's domestic law and Canada's relevant international treaties and trade agreements, that such evidence has not yet been used (in 2022) in trademark litigation in Canadian courts or tribunals but that there appears to be no legal barrier to its use in future in Canada. This research notes that neuroscience literature indicates that, while Bartholomew discussed "neuromarks" as a future concept, from the neuroscientific perspective, it is already scientifically possible to obtain evidence of individuals' connections between marks and specific goods and services: it only awaits litigators in Canadian cases introducing such evidence and Bartholomew's "neuromarks" can become a reality.
590 $a School code: 0784.
650 4 $a Inventors. $3 534219
650 4 $a Litigation. $3 3564647
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 1017622
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-11.
790 $a 0784
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29239004