東華大學圖書館 |

Essays in the Economics of Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays in the Economics of Education./
作者:	Owen, Stephanie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	163 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-05A.
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28845503
ISBN:	9798471102347

Essays in the Economics of Education.
Owen, Stephanie.

Essays in the Economics of Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 163 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation studies the reasons for and consequences of different choices in human capital investment. The theme connecting the three essays is a desire to understand reasons for inequality in educational choices and outcomes, as well as shed light on policies that may or may not remedy those inequalities. In each chapter, I use quantitative casual inference methods and rich administrative data to understand students' educational trajectories. The first chapter investigates the role of beliefs about academic performance in explaining gender differences in college major choice. I run a randomized controlled trial with undergraduate students across seven STEM disciplines. Treated students receive information about their performance relative to their classmates and to STEM majors. I find that absent intervention, men overestimate their own relative rank by more and are more likely to underestimate how other STEM majors perform, while women are more likely to overestimate others. The intervention shrinks gender gaps in biased beliefs by between a third and half. Treatment also closes the two-credit gender gap in STEM course-taking during the subsequent semester by ten percent. These changes are driven largely by low-performing, overconfident men correctly updating their beliefs and taking fewer STEM credits, rather than encouraging women to stick with STEM. The second chapter studies the effect of grading policies on college course-taking and major choice, with a focus on differences by gender. I study a natural experiment within the economics department of a large university, which changed its grading policy to give out higher grades in its introductory economics courses. I leverage this variation to compare students with the same underlying performance but who received different letter grades. I find that receiving a higher grade in introductory economics increases the likelihood that a student will take the next course in the sequence by between two and three percentage points, with much smaller effects on economics major choice. Higher economics grades lead more students to declare a major in business---the highest-earning major at the studied institution. I find little evidence that women are more responsive to grades than men. My findings suggest that grade inflation as a policy may work to retain more students within a field, but is unlikely to close gender gaps. In Chapter Three, I study the Advanced Placement (AP) program, which is nearly ubiquitous in American high schools and is often touted as a way to close achievement gaps by income and race. Using administrative data from Michigan, I exploit variation within high schools across time in AP course offerings to identify the causal effect of AP course availability on college choice and degree attainment. I find that higher income students, White and Asian students, and higher-achieving students are both more likely to take advantage of AP courses when they are offered as well as more likely to reap the benefits of taking them. The results imply that not only does the AP program fail to close achievement gaps, it may actually be harming the most disadvantaged students. I find suggestive evidence that the negative effects for low-income and underrepresented minority students are driven by negative spillovers or the diversion of resources from non-AP students and courses, rather than direct effects of these students taking AP.

ISBN: 9798471102347Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Economics of Education

Essays in the Economics of Education.
LDR:04660nmm a2200385 4500 001 2351146
005 20221107085307.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798471102347
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28845503
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham003907
035 $a AAI28845503
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Owen, Stephanie. $3 3690699
245 1 0 $a Essays in the Economics of Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dynarski, Susan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This dissertation studies the reasons for and consequences of different choices in human capital investment. The theme connecting the three essays is a desire to understand reasons for inequality in educational choices and outcomes, as well as shed light on policies that may or may not remedy those inequalities. In each chapter, I use quantitative casual inference methods and rich administrative data to understand students' educational trajectories. The first chapter investigates the role of beliefs about academic performance in explaining gender differences in college major choice. I run a randomized controlled trial with undergraduate students across seven STEM disciplines. Treated students receive information about their performance relative to their classmates and to STEM majors. I find that absent intervention, men overestimate their own relative rank by more and are more likely to underestimate how other STEM majors perform, while women are more likely to overestimate others. The intervention shrinks gender gaps in biased beliefs by between a third and half. Treatment also closes the two-credit gender gap in STEM course-taking during the subsequent semester by ten percent. These changes are driven largely by low-performing, overconfident men correctly updating their beliefs and taking fewer STEM credits, rather than encouraging women to stick with STEM. The second chapter studies the effect of grading policies on college course-taking and major choice, with a focus on differences by gender. I study a natural experiment within the economics department of a large university, which changed its grading policy to give out higher grades in its introductory economics courses. I leverage this variation to compare students with the same underlying performance but who received different letter grades. I find that receiving a higher grade in introductory economics increases the likelihood that a student will take the next course in the sequence by between two and three percentage points, with much smaller effects on economics major choice. Higher economics grades lead more students to declare a major in business---the highest-earning major at the studied institution. I find little evidence that women are more responsive to grades than men. My findings suggest that grade inflation as a policy may work to retain more students within a field, but is unlikely to close gender gaps. In Chapter Three, I study the Advanced Placement (AP) program, which is nearly ubiquitous in American high schools and is often touted as a way to close achievement gaps by income and race. Using administrative data from Michigan, I exploit variation within high schools across time in AP course offerings to identify the causal effect of AP course availability on college choice and degree attainment. I find that higher income students, White and Asian students, and higher-achieving students are both more likely to take advantage of AP courses when they are offered as well as more likely to reap the benefits of taking them. The results imply that not only does the AP program fail to close achievement gaps, it may actually be harming the most disadvantaged students. I find suggestive evidence that the negative effects for low-income and underrepresented minority students are driven by negative spillovers or the diversion of resources from non-AP students and courses, rather than direct effects of these students taking AP.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Education finance. $3 3172165
653 $a Economics of Education
653 $a Human capital investment
653 $a Inequality
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0511
690 $a 0277
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Public Policy & Economics. $3 3558953
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-05A.
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28845503