東華大學圖書館 |

A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest = = Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest =/
其他題名:	Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi.
作者:	Kaya, Elif.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	172 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-11B.
標題:	Study abroad. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29090097
ISBN:	9798426887480

A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest = = Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi.
Kaya, Elif.

A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest =Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 172 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The current study compares the computerized adaptive test (CAT) and paper-based test (PBT) versions of an English language proficiency reading subtest in terms of psychometric qualities. The study also investigates classification performance of CATs not designed for classification purposes with reference to its PBT version. Real data-based simulations were conducted under varying test conditions. The results demonstrate that ability levels estimated by CATs and PBT are similar. A relatively larger item reduction can be obtained with 0.50 and 0.40 standard error thresholds and CATs terminated with 20, 25, and 30 items performed well with acceptable SE values. Reliability of CAT ability estimates was comparable and highly correlated with PBT estimates. For classification analysis, classification accuracy (CA) and classification consistency (CC) was also estimated using the Rudner method. Classification analyses were conducted on single and multiple cut-off points. The results showed that the use of a single cut-off score produced better classification performance, particularly for high and low ability groups. On the other hand, the use of multiple cut-off scores simultaneously yielded significantly lower classification performance. Overall, the results highlight the potential for CATs not designed specifically for classification to serve classification purposes and indicate avenues for further research.

ISBN: 9798426887480Subjects--Topical Terms:

3557623
Study abroad.

A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest = = Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi.
LDR:04703nmm a2200397 4500 001 2350095
005 20221020123854.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798426887480
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29090097
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Bilkent_1169376930
035 $a AAI29090097
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kaya, Elif. $3 3689545
245 1 0 $a A Comparability and Classification Analysis of Computerized Adaptive And Conventional Paper-Based Versions of an English Language Proficiency Reading Subtest = $b Bir Ingilizce Yeterlilik Sinavi Okuma Alt Testinin Bilgisayar Ortaminda Bireysellestirilmis Test ve Geleneksel Kagit Kalem Test Uygulamalarinin Karsilastirilabilirligi ve Siniflandirma Analizi.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 172 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Kalender, Ilker.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The current study compares the computerized adaptive test (CAT) and paper-based test (PBT) versions of an English language proficiency reading subtest in terms of psychometric qualities. The study also investigates classification performance of CATs not designed for classification purposes with reference to its PBT version. Real data-based simulations were conducted under varying test conditions. The results demonstrate that ability levels estimated by CATs and PBT are similar. A relatively larger item reduction can be obtained with 0.50 and 0.40 standard error thresholds and CATs terminated with 20, 25, and 30 items performed well with acceptable SE values. Reliability of CAT ability estimates was comparable and highly correlated with PBT estimates. For classification analysis, classification accuracy (CA) and classification consistency (CC) was also estimated using the Rudner method. Classification analyses were conducted on single and multiple cut-off points. The results showed that the use of a single cut-off score produced better classification performance, particularly for high and low ability groups. On the other hand, the use of multiple cut-off scores simultaneously yielded significantly lower classification performance. Overall, the results highlight the potential for CATs not designed specifically for classification to serve classification purposes and indicate avenues for further research.
520 $a Bu arastirma bir Ingilizce yeterlilik okuma alt testinin bilgisayar ortaminda bireysellestirilmis test (CAT) ve geleneksel kagit kalem test olarak uygulanmasindan elde edilen puanlari cesitli psikometrik ozellikler acisindan karsilastirmakta ve siniflandirma yapmak amaciyla tasarlanmamis tipik CAT uygulamalarinin siniflandirma performansini kagit kalem testiyle kiyaslayarak incelemektedir. Bu amacla farkli test sonlandirma kurallari uygulayarak gercek veriye dayali simulasyonlar yapilmistir. Sonuclar CAT ve PBT uygulamalarindan elde edilen yetenek kestirimlerinin benzer oldugunu ortaya koymustur. CAT uygulamasinda 0,50 ve 0,40 standart hata esikleriyle sonlandirilan testlerde soru sayisinda goreceli olarak daha fazla bir azalma elde edildigi ve sabit soru sayisi kuraliyla sonlandirilan testlerde 20, 25 ve 30 soru sayilarinin kabul edilebilir standart hata degerleri ile birlikte iyi sonuclar verdigi gozlemlenmistir. CAT uygulamalarindan elde edilen yetenek kestirimlerinin guvenilirligi ile kagit kalem test uygulamasindan elde edilen kestirimlerin guvenilirligi benzer ve yuksek duzeyde iliskili cikmistir. Siniflandirma analizi kapsaminda, calismada siniflandirma dogrulugu (CA) ve tutarliligi (CC) Rudner yontemi ile kestirilmistir. Farkli sayi ve noktalarda kesme puani goz onunde bulundurulmustur. Sonuclar tek bir kesme puaninin kullanilmasinin, ozellikle yuksek ve dusuk yetenek gruplarinda, daha iyi bir siniflandirma performansina yol actigini gostermistir. Ote yandan, tek seferde birden cok kesme puaninin ayni anda kullanilmasinin ise siniflandirma performansini onemli derecede dusurdugu gorulmstur. Genel olarak, sonuclar siniflandirma yapmak icin tasarlanmamis tipik CAT uygulamalarinin da siniflandirma potansiyelini ortaya koymus ve ileride yapilabilecek olasi arastirma alanlarini da belirlemistir.
590 $a School code: 1159.
650 4 $a Study abroad. $3 3557623
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Comparability. $3 3687163
650 4 $a Language proficiency. $3 3682512
650 4 $a Curricula. $3 3422445
650 4 $a English language. $3 516194
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Parameter estimation. $3 567557
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey). $3 1919057
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-11B.
790 $a 1159
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29090097