東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action./
作者:	Buttanri, Esra.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	116 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-11.
標題:	Climate change. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498475
ISBN:	9798738618949

Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action.
Buttanri, Esra.

Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 116 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Climate change came to the international security agenda in 2007: the United Nations Security Council held its first debate on the topic, and the Ministerial Council of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) discussed for the first time the linkages between climate change and security. Since then, the impacts of climate change on peace and security have been extensively researched and evidenced. But, the question of whether and how these impacts should be addressed by the security organizations has remained unanswered due to the lack of an agreement among their member States. Climate change is a systemic and multifaceted challenge that requires the engagement of all stakeholders, including the security community. Then, why it has so far not been possible to reach an agreement within the security organizations to act upon it. Using discourse analysis, my goal is to uncover the dynamics of contestation over the securitization of climate change at the intergovernmental settings- in this case, the Security Council and the OSCE - and to draw conclusions on how to overcome this paradox of inaction. I sought an answer to this question through analyzing statements delivered by the European Union, Russian Federation, and the United States of America at the Security Council and the OSCE between 2007 and 2020. I conclude that the contestation on climate security is a result of the broader clash of misaligned worldviews and political identities of member states of the respective intergovernmental organizations. Dialogue and co-operation among member States around mutually beneficial multilateral solutions are the way to go. Initiatives such as the European Green Deal, transatlantic alliance on climate change, and the prospects for the Arctic region, if used well, may offer opportunities for convergence rather than divergence. In the mean time, the security organizations should take steps to mainstream climate change into their toolbox, policies, and practices for the maintenance of peace and security, particularly through a preventive approach.

ISBN: 9798738618949Subjects--Topical Terms:

2079509
Climate change.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Climate change

Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action.
LDR:03289nmm a2200373 4500 001 2349304
005 20220920133715.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798738618949
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28498475
035 $a AAI28498475
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Buttanri, Esra. $3 3688712
245 1 0 $a Different Worldviews, One World: The Untapped Potential of Security Community in Climate Action.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 116 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
500 $a Advisor: Reshetnikov, Anatoly.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Climate change came to the international security agenda in 2007: the United Nations Security Council held its first debate on the topic, and the Ministerial Council of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) discussed for the first time the linkages between climate change and security. Since then, the impacts of climate change on peace and security have been extensively researched and evidenced. But, the question of whether and how these impacts should be addressed by the security organizations has remained unanswered due to the lack of an agreement among their member States. Climate change is a systemic and multifaceted challenge that requires the engagement of all stakeholders, including the security community. Then, why it has so far not been possible to reach an agreement within the security organizations to act upon it. Using discourse analysis, my goal is to uncover the dynamics of contestation over the securitization of climate change at the intergovernmental settings- in this case, the Security Council and the OSCE - and to draw conclusions on how to overcome this paradox of inaction. I sought an answer to this question through analyzing statements delivered by the European Union, Russian Federation, and the United States of America at the Security Council and the OSCE between 2007 and 2020. I conclude that the contestation on climate security is a result of the broader clash of misaligned worldviews and political identities of member states of the respective intergovernmental organizations. Dialogue and co-operation among member States around mutually beneficial multilateral solutions are the way to go. Initiatives such as the European Green Deal, transatlantic alliance on climate change, and the prospects for the Arctic region, if used well, may offer opportunities for convergence rather than divergence. In the mean time, the security organizations should take steps to mainstream climate change into their toolbox, policies, and practices for the maintenance of peace and security, particularly through a preventive approach.
590 $a School code: 0813.
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Peace studies. $3 3172392
653 $a Climate change
653 $a Discourse analysis
653 $a Organization for Security and Co-operation
653 $a Securitization
653 $a United Nations Security Council
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0563
710 2 $a Webster University. $b History, Politics & International Relations. $3 3349808
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-11.
790 $a 0813
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498475